you don't...mmmmmtony tony chopper wrote:I don't understand anything
The Fight for FM
-
- Banned
- 1842 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
-
- KVRian
- 759 posts since 22 Mar, 2002 from fi
Could you then point one preset that represents the general tone well (or just say "any of them" if it doesn't matter which one) so we could get forward in defining what the general tone may be about, instead of arguing?living sounds wrote:I don't think this synth can produce spectacular sounds. What I'm talking about is the general tone. Listen to the tightness of the envelopes, and notice the absense of an aggressive high end that so often plagues the plugin world.
never stop loving music.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35482 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
perhaps you should read my question as a question, something which is different from a comment.Aroused by JarJar wrote:You should read what I write before commenting, I think.
By who's definitions of 'good', 'real', 'solid' and 'musically useful'?It is NOT about emulating ANYTHING, the main thing is about making a good, "real" solid musically useful sound.
And aren't you in the minority of people who think that those arent already achieved at a sufficient level.
Which makes the next bit ironic.
Who other than a nut with some axe to grind would stand up and say that everyone agrees with them completely over subjective assessments like 'good' and 'solid', and that only nutters would disagree.Who other than a nut with some ax to grind would disagree with that beats me.
See that thing you said about reading what people wrote before commenting? You should try it. No-one claimed 'quality sound was a flaw'. In fact, what I said is pretty much repeated by your 'feature that appears by accident'. So thanks for agreeing.Quality sound is NOT a flaw. It is a feature that appears by accident or design or both.
Correction : Some small minority of people want FM that doesn't sound "weak" to them, by their definition of 'weak', whilst most folk are perfectly happy using what exists.People want FM that doesn't sound "weak", as far as I can tell.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Banned
- 1842 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
.....mmmmmmm......z15 wrote:may be about, instead of arguing?living sounds wrote:Listen to the tightness of the envelopes, and notice the absense of an aggressive high end
-
- KVRian
- 759 posts since 22 Mar, 2002 from fi
Hmm oh yeah, got a spare bag of popcorn for me too?Rangtangtang wrote:.....mmmmmmm......
never stop loving music.
-
Aroused by JarJar Aroused by JarJar https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191505
- KVRian
- 1048 posts since 16 Oct, 2008
??? See if you'd read what I write you'd already know that I have my own FM synth that I like very much (and it is software).whyterabbyt wrote:perhaps you should read my question as a question, something which is different from a comment.Aroused by JarJar wrote:You should read what I write before commenting, I think.
By who's definitions of 'good', 'real', 'solid' and 'musically useful'?It is NOT about emulating ANYTHING, the main thing is about making a good, "real" solid musically useful sound.
And aren't you in the minority of people who think that those arent already achieved at a sufficient level.
Straw man. I'm totally cool with people thinking FM8 for example sounds great, totally open to accepting their subjective opinion as "objective", which it is in art. The flipside of this is NOT that I and others are deluded fools for NOT finding it to sound good, but finding other synths to sound good.whyterabbyt wrote: Which makes the next bit ironic.Who other than a nut with some axe to grind would stand up and say that everyone agrees with them completely over subjective assessments like 'good' and 'solid', and that only nutters would disagree.Who other than a nut with some ax to grind would disagree with that beats me.
See that thing you said about reading what people wrote before commenting? You should try it. No-one claimed 'quality sound was a flaw'. In fact, what I said is pretty much repeated by your 'feature that appears by accident'. So thanks for agreeing.[/quote]Quality sound is NOT a flaw. It is a feature that appears by accident or design or both.
By accident and/or design. What sounds good to me in the FM synth I use happens by purely by design, not by accident.
Correction : Some small minority of people want FM that doesn't sound "weak" to them, by their definition of 'weak', whilst most folk are perfectly happy using what exists.[/quote]People want FM that doesn't sound "weak", as far as I can tell.
Don't you mean to add "as far as I can tell?" Or do you speak from divine authority?
-
- KVRAF
- 2208 posts since 13 May, 2005
Of course, your assumption that a majority at this board doesn't hear a difference wouldn't make it any more true.whyterabbyt wrote: And aren't you in the minority of people who think that those arent already achieved at a sufficient level.
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
pick a goddamn VOPM preset
DOLPH WILL PWNZ0R J00r LAWZ!!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 2208 posts since 13 May, 2005
no need to get angry. pick the "China Bell Doub" from the "bells" list for example. Listen how fast and snappy the attack sounds (provided you've got the converters and monitors to hear it). Listen how balanced it all sounds, how homogenous it sounds accross the whole key range. How well it fits in a mix. How the attack is really clear and sharp whitout any aggression. How you can press 10 or more keys at once without getting a mess, but one clear punchy output. How it sounds alive when you play arpeggios, like every single keystroke is a little different. That's what musicians care for. That's what makes producers and mixers happy.tony tony chopper wrote:pick a goddamn VOPM preset
- KVRAF
- 2187 posts since 25 Jan, 2007 from the back room, away from his wife's sight (or so he thinks)
Cakewalk by Bandlab / FL Studio
Squire Stratocaster / Chapman ML3 Modern V2 / Fender Precision Bass
Formerly known as arke, VladimirDimitrievich, bslf, and ctmg. Yep, those bans were deserved.
Squire Stratocaster / Chapman ML3 Modern V2 / Fender Precision Bass
Formerly known as arke, VladimirDimitrievich, bslf, and ctmg. Yep, those bans were deserved.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35482 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Learn to read, fool. I said nothing about this board, or about the ability to hear differences.living sounds wrote:Of course, your assumption that a majority at this board doesn't hear a difference wouldn't make it any more true.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
living sounds wrote:no need to get angry. pick the "China Bell Doub" from the "bells" list for example. Listen how fast and snappy the attack sounds (provided you've got the converters and monitors to hear it). Listen how balanced it all sounds, how homogenous it sounds accross the whole key range. How well it fits in a mix. How the attack is really clear and sharp whitout any aggression. How you can press 10 or more keys at once without getting a mess, but one clear punchy output. How it sounds alive when you play arpeggios, like every single keystroke is a little different. That's what musicians care for. That's what makes producers and mixers happy.tony tony chopper wrote:pick a goddamn VOPM preset
Yeah, I'm sure you know better than him what makes producers and mixers happy.
How many FL Studio's you sold now gol?
-
- KVRAF
- 2208 posts since 13 May, 2005
Why do you two have to resort to insults all the time? Let's have a discussion like adults, just for once, all right?
The "Glocken 1" patch in VOPM is a great example as well. Put an arpeggiator (like the free Wuzik one in front of it).
The "Glocken 1" patch in VOPM is a great example as well. Put an arpeggiator (like the free Wuzik one in front of it).
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
Adults understand that the yardstick in their head is personal not universal. It's impossible to have an adult conversation with somebody who hasn't learned this.living sounds wrote:Why do you too have to resort to insults all the time? Let's have a discussion like adults, just for once, all right?
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
ok just to be sure that I won't waste my time, we're talking about this, right?
http://anothergol.googlepages.com/China.mp3
http://anothergol.googlepages.com/China.mp3
DOLPH WILL PWNZ0R J00r LAWZ!!!!

