Anything new in the pipeline from DDMF ?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2824 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from cornwall
No other interest in a vintage eq here?
I'd love to see something to challenge the UAD Neve or Pultec eq's from DDMF!
I'd love to see something to challenge the UAD Neve or Pultec eq's from DDMF!
-
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 30 Oct, 2004 from Greece
Any chance to see your plugins in windows 64bit and 64bit host?
Wtb inspiration!
-
- KVRist
- 371 posts since 11 Feb, 2007 from LA, CA
Ok, +1 for the vintage EQ!dickiefunk wrote:No other interest in a vintage eq here?
I'd love to see something to challenge the UAD Neve or Pultec eq's from DDMF!
- KVRian
- 669 posts since 2 Apr, 2005 from out there
Okay, I might give it a try. Although I sometimes think it would be wiser to explore the still vast unknown territory that software audio effects have to offer than to digitally simulate legendary hardware from the 60's (which will never be a perfect copy anyway). But I do understand that in order to shape the future one first must understand the past (how poetic is that?)...
For 64 bit versions I need to buy new hardware, then it shouldn't be much of a problem. The buying process is of course greatly influenced by the sales figures
.
PS: I got various emails wishing me a speedy recovery for my broken arm. Which is nice, but on the other hand not really necessary, as I am NOT Christian Budde (to whom I hereby redirect the best wishes...).
For 64 bit versions I need to buy new hardware, then it shouldn't be much of a problem. The buying process is of course greatly influenced by the sales figures
PS: I got various emails wishing me a speedy recovery for my broken arm. Which is nice, but on the other hand not really necessary, as I am NOT Christian Budde (to whom I hereby redirect the best wishes...).
-
Christian Budde Christian Budde https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25572
- KVRAF
- 1538 posts since 14 May, 2004 from Europe
Thanks for thatdocdued wrote:PS: I got various emails wishing me a speedy recovery for my broken arm. Which is nice, but on the other hand not really necessary, as I am NOT Christian Budde (to whom I hereby redirect the best wishes...).
Even if you are a competitor in regards of EQs, I take this chance to wish you all the best with your 'babies'.
Christian (the one with the broken arm)
- KVRian
- 669 posts since 2 Apr, 2005 from out there
-
- KVRian
- 528 posts since 2 Jan, 2007
I would vote for the more adventurous route. Christian has shown
that he can develop excellent equalizers and I am very curious to
see what else he can come up with.
Cheers,
Scott
that he can develop excellent equalizers and I am very curious to
see what else he can come up with.
Cheers,
Scott
-
- KVRAF
- 7028 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
dickiefunk wrote:No other interest in a vintage eq here?
Yes, same here.rexlapin wrote:I would vote for the more adventurous route.
Well, i would rather first enjoy a M/S and L/R able version of IIeq, but after that i'd be more curious to enjoy something else than an eq (there already are plenty, and plenty good ones even in the vintage department : Bootsie's NastyCS, Stillwell, many Electri-Q modes, the LeftOver Lasagne one, etc).
I am excited about the multiband stereo widener.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2824 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from cornwall
Yeah I already have BootEq and the Pushtec EQ. BootEq II looks very interesting but unfortunately I get a GUI bug with all of Bootsies pluginssinkmusic wrote:dickiefunk wrote:No other interest in a vintage eq here?Yes, same here.rexlapin wrote:I would vote for the more adventurous route.
Well, i would rather first enjoy a M/S and L/R able version of IIeq, but after that i'd be more curious to enjoy something else than an eq (there already are plenty, and plenty good ones even in the vintage department : Bootsie's NastyCS, Stillwell, many Electri-Q modes, the LeftOver Lasagne one, etc).
I am excited about the multiband stereo widener.
I also like Stillwell's Vibe Eq but after hearing the quality of IIEQ Pro, Colour Eq and LP10 I reckon DDMF could release something that would blow these away!
-
- KVRer
- 9 posts since 16 Dec, 2008
I agree with this 100%.docdued wrote:Although I sometimes think it would be wiser to explore the still vast unknown territory that software audio effects have to offer than to digitally simulate legendary hardware from the 60's (which will never be a perfect copy anyway).
Btw, could you post a screenshot of the upcoming plugin? I'm just curious.
- KVRian
- 669 posts since 2 Apr, 2005 from out there
-
- KVRAF
- 7028 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
It looks great !
And i guess it is even resizable/colour-themeable like Colour eq ?
Is asking for 3 bands (instead of 2) way too much
?
And i guess it is even resizable/colour-themeable like Colour eq ?
Is asking for 3 bands (instead of 2) way too much
- KVRian
- 669 posts since 2 Apr, 2005 from out there
It's resizable. Colour-themability remains exclusive to ColourEQ for the moment. Three bands might be a worthwhile extension, but v1.0 will be two bands.sinkmusic wrote:It looks great !
And i guess it is even resizable/colour-themeable like Colour eq ?![]()
Is asking for 3 bands (instead of 2) way too much?
-
- KVRian
- 1445 posts since 1 Jun, 2008
I guess there will be a width spectrum on the right?
This is a greatly needed plugin btw, I love the stereo tool in Reason and have been looking for something similar like this.
Cheers,
Fridtjof
This is a greatly needed plugin btw, I love the stereo tool in Reason and have been looking for something similar like this.
Cheers,
Fridtjof

