KVR Audio

shogger · Post by **shogger** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:55 am

s_t wrote:
shogger wrote:Wow!!! That looks super interesting. Why is it restricted to 44 and 48kHz?

Shogger
+1 I agree. I moved to 96KHz couple of years ago.
But I guess that's the choice developers have to make. Don't get me wrong, I'm not not complaining, even though this plugin may not be for me
cheers

This choice is not a technical choice. Maybe he wants to make a pro/pay version with unlimited sample rate support which would be more than understandable.

Shogger

H.86 · Post by **H.86** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:06 pm

from page 13 of this thread:

Bootsie wrote:
unfortunately it won't work properly cauz the compensation for the curve warping near nyquist is just flawless calculated at 44.1 and so you will get unpredictable curve behaviour at different SR.

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:11 pm

Uhm, ya, I will change that, some day

48kHz is safe as well but not much more higher samplerates, atm.
But today Patrick and me struggled on squeezing this damn nice graphics into a reasonable sized VST, man, what a pain

but at the end of the day we've survived somehow and the plug-in too.
On the fun side, I'm already mixing with this pretty subtle little mofo and I just can warn you: It will turn out to be really addictive in the end. On my own I'm already infected from the transformer LF distortion simulation which is smooth like cake. I'm just dialing in a little bit here and there and thats already the ticket in the whole mix. Did I say to forget the EQ? Not at all, just dial in some 2dB HF and add some subtle preamp goodness and voila: 3d imaging improvements in the whole mix. And I swear: there were no M/S tricks or so applied here. It's just the EQ and the signal modelled pre-amp simulation.
I will probably upload some seductive sound demos during next days to make the waiting on this just a little bit harder for you

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:16 pm

Hope you didn't make it too small Bootsie, that GUI is just too nice.

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:19 pm

don't get this wrong: the screen size/resolution will be the same. We were just struggling with the size in memory (RAM) of it.

Mercado_Negro · Post by **Mercado_Negro** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:22 pm

Can we have a new teaser?

pattonfreak1 · Post by **pattonfreak1** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:22 pm

Mercado_Negro wrote:Can we have a new teaser?

Mercado_Negro · Post by **Mercado_Negro** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:41 am

pattonfreak1 wrote:
Mercado_Negro wrote:Can we have a new teaser?

No? and What about this:

http://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/200 ... /#more-170

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:05 pm

Don't you wish your EQ was hot like me?

BootEQ mkII release will be this friday!

Meanwhile you can see some hot curves
>>> here <<< but please don't drool here again

Thanks,
bootsy

mammath · Post by **mammath** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:11 pm

bootsie wrote:but please don't drool here again

That is one sexy beast! I feel it coming.......

Synchronize the drool fellas!

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:17 pm

bootsie wrote:Don't you wish your EQ was hot like me?

mammath · Post by **mammath** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:26 pm

???????

Am I missing something here?

A3ntar · Post by **A3ntar** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:35 pm

bootsie wrote:Don't you wish your EQ was hot like me?

BootEQ mkII release will be this friday!

Meanwhile you can see some hot curves
>>> here <<< but please don't drool here again

Thanks,
bootsy

Wow!!! looks very nice!

I hope it sounds as good as it looks

sellmestory · Post by **sellmestory** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:47 pm

A Friday 13th release.....promising.
I never wanted a release as bad as I want this one as this one.

Your version 1.1,sounds amazing,so this exciting.

Sellmestory

sinkmusic · Post by **sinkmusic** » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:48 pm

Cowabunga !

I use NastyCS quite often, could you tell in what way does BootEq (the eq section) differs sonically from NastyCS ?

Release: BootEQmkII (was BootEQ 1.1 ...)