With all due respect, not taking into consideration your lack of ability to maintain a mature level of conversation and inability to understand anyone's "logic" (haha, pun), what really separates any DAW software from another? Isn't it up to the individual on what is important, and what is not? You say this is not the original question, and yet you respond to this. If it was irrelevant, there would be no need to respond to it. But it is indeed a relevant point; you can't claim something for one, as if it applies to nothing else, when it clearly does.neverfall wrote:While [WhyteRabbit] still can't list Sonar features or show me a marketing ad that positions it to stand out from the rest
Begging your pardon, but below the post you made that I quoted in part, you have also recommended to WhyteRabbit that he should not click on certain thread titles. I wonder why that might be? This form of request is often used as a fallback response on the internet, brushing under the carpet that which is uncomfortable and unavoidable. I am sure there are many such threads you have clicked on, and responded within, that you should not have either, completely hypocritising your statement. I would ask that you kindly keep such ridiculously useless comments to yourself. Avoiding a thread even when you have something valid to say within it is unnecessary, and to request someone to do so is admittance of an inability to find a logical and acceptable argument against what you so desperately wish to do.
Good day to you.
