KVR Audio

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:36 pm

Awesome!!

Cheers!
bManic

Liero · Post by **Liero** » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:57 am

This might have been mentioned somewhere, but any chance of seeing bootsie stuff in 64-bit versions?

TesslaPRO looks to be a ballbreaker. Excellent.

surfingo · Post by **surfingo** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:52 am

thank you bootsie, can't wait !

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:48 am

Liero wrote:This might have been mentioned somewhere, but any chance of seeing bootsie stuff in 64-bit versions?

Why?

bM3w · Post by **bM3w** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:58 am

To use it in a 64Bit host without "bridging" the plugin.

vicious_angel · Post by **vicious_angel** » Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:58 pm

+1 for 64bit plugins if possible.

Emerald Tablet · Post by **Emerald Tablet** » Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:00 pm

yipee

marmaz · Post by **marmaz** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:32 am

Emerald Tablet wrote:yipee

+1000

http://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/200 ... t-happens/

VSTJuNkiE · Post by **VSTJuNkiE** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:19 am

As regards to article(and I quote):

"TesslaPRO is going to be released in May 2009 and will be available as FREEWARE for PC and VST capable hosts."

I think I just SHAT myself

And as always your GUI's are totally wicked bro.

TristezaOrange · Post by **TristezaOrange** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:34 am

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:48 am

Very interesting. With Kingston we've come to the same conclusion, transient's is where it's at. While measuring the frequency response of his custom SSL compressor, we didn't see any real change in the plot but we heard clear differences when changing components. Sometimes it would sound more muddy, or clear.. just like somebody had been tweaking an EQ, even though there was NO CHANGE in the frequency response plot. So, the conclusion is, it's all in the transient.

I'm very interested in hearing the new Tessla Pro and what it can do. The only thing I'm a bit worried about is the 4 times oversampling. I'm not sure why but lately I've been a bit allergic towards any oversampling. Most processors sound more "relaxed" and natural with oversampling turned off. Again, this is probably due to the transient. Doesn't it slightly change when one does sample rate conversion, first up, then down again? Surely the original transient does not stay the same when you add extra samples and then reduce them again?

I have not done any thorough A/B tests so this might all be placebo (or badly implemented up/down sampling in the effects I've tried).

Cheers!
bManic

meloco_go · Post by **meloco_go** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:42 am

bmanic wrote:While measuring the frequency response of his custom SSL compressor, we didn't see any real change in the plot but we heard clear differences when changing components. Sometimes it would sound more muddy, or clear.. just like somebody had been tweaking an EQ, even though there was NO CHANGE in the frequency response plot. So, the conclusion is, it's all in the transient.

You'd better measure step response or impulse response.
Frequency graphs are kinda slowpokey slow)))

bootsie · Post by **bootsie** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:52 am

bmanic wrote: I'm very interested in hearing the new Tessla Pro and what it can do. The only thing I'm a bit worried about is the 4 times oversampling. I'm not sure why but lately I've been a bit allergic towards any oversampling. Most processors sound more "relaxed" and natural with oversampling turned off. Again, this is probably due to the transient. Doesn't it slightly change when one does sample rate conversion, first up, then down again? Surely the original transient does not stay the same when you add extra samples and then reduce them again?

The more effect comes from the pre-ringing of LP filters which are commonly used and thats definately affecting the transient and no placebo. In TesslaPRO a minimum phase filter is used instead and the ringing is avoided but some phase and ripple in the passband is introduced. It's always a tradeoff.

lmnop · Post by **lmnop** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:00 am

Hey Bootsie, I just can't wait til you release TesslaPro....will it be ready in days,weeks, or months? I might put off some mixing if it is coming soon!!!!

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:39 am

meloco_go wrote:
bmanic wrote:While measuring the frequency response of his custom SSL compressor, we didn't see any real change in the plot but we heard clear differences when changing components. Sometimes it would sound more muddy, or clear.. just like somebody had been tweaking an EQ, even though there was NO CHANGE in the frequency response plot. So, the conclusion is, it's all in the transient.
You'd better measure step response or impulse response.
Frequency graphs are kinda slowpokey slow)))

Yes that's true. I've used Christian Budde's VST plugin analyzer with it's asio output and it seems to measure the frequency response with a step tone/impulse so it is still kind of a mystery to me how we could hear so apparent changes in the frequency response while not seeing any change.

Cheers!
bManic

TesslaPRO (update v1.0.1)