Well... is it a good idea to record an entire symphony orchestra on 64 tracks in Record, and then change the tempo from 120 to 60? Probably not. But it works surprisingly well on a lot of material, and for people who like to bring in vocal tracks and make remixes at a different tempo it's absolutely killer. For a guitarist who can't keep up with Yngwie and likes to cheat by lowering the tempo during recording and then return to the original tempo, it's killer. I don't think timestretch can be 100% artifact free even in theory, but this is the best one I've heard. The second best I've heard was a plugin for my old Soundscape hard disk recording system I used in the early 90's. Granted, it wasn't realtime and cost a fortune, but it could make radical tempo changes on an entire mix and produce results that were so good there would only be 3-4 spots during an entire song where it would screw up some transient on the drums or add an unnatural transition from a vowel to a noun on the vocals...headquest wrote:I agree with John Vulich that using a real-time timestretch in a production context is not a very good idea. But I wonder whether Record might change that... and I'm guessing that the technology behind it may be something other developers start wanting to license from Propellerhead if they get the chance.
Like I said, there were amazing timestretch algorithms already in the early 90's. It all comes down to who makes it. An audio software company can have great GUI programmers and mediocre DSP programmers and vice versa. Some just give up and buy stuff like timestretch algoritms from a third party. I don't know much about Ableton so I have no idea what their strengths and weaknesses are, but one possible answer to your question might be that they don't have someone like Pelle at Props who can do crazy stuff like that in his sleep. There are lots of coders but those real DSP kings are pretty rare, companies are lucky to have just one. Ableton could have half a dozen or zero of them, I dunno.If this has really been around in Prop Headquarters for a while, it begs the question, why haven't Ableton put more development into improving their timestretch before now, considering the huge number of user requests to do something to make it credible.
I have no idea, let me take a look...nuffink wrote:I'll try again...
How's the integration with the samplers, blank? Is it a simple drag and drop to get your takes into nn-xt/nn-19?
(recording nonsense audio take now)
(attempting to drag it from sequencer to NN-XT in rack)
(unsuccessful)
(attempting right-clicking on audio take and selecting "Bounce clip to disk...")
(loading bounced wav into NN-XT)
Now the NN-XT can play a clip of me saying "blaaaeeehhhhhuuurrughhhhh"
Short answer: No!
