Then u dont have any clue what sound fatIgro wrote:totally no.keel wrote:You kidding me, right?Igro wrote:Just simple audio sample of sync saw, usnison and delay:
Largo SyncSaw.mp3 - 1.22MB
Sounds massive. I love Largo.
Largo demo version available!
-
- KVRian
- 893 posts since 27 Oct, 2004 from Inside the kick drum
-
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Did you check this? http://www.waldorfmusic.de/en/archive?r ... rgo/soundsrob_lee wrote:Largo does fat basses easily.. it has 2 sub oscs per layer so that's fat enough..you can get amazing sounds from this vst...problem is that people don't seem to like the factory presets which is fine but the best way to judge is to create your own from scratch and you'll have much more fun.
i have a full "init" bank for anyone who wants it to make their own presets..and Largo is'nt that big on cpu if you use the fx etc sparingly
just my opinion of course..there will be those who love the waldorf sound and those who don't and if you don't just buy something else or stick with what youv'e got...it really is that simple
rob
init bank already there.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
-
- KVRAF
- 4585 posts since 2 Nov, 2006
Sorry Waldorf guy. I was under crack. Largo is a great instrument (after all "largo" means "large"). But please, my beloved newbies, focus your attention on the synth and stop commenting on my opinion. After all I've only used different words to say what other people said before and after me: Largo - in his current incarnation - is not perfect or, in other words, have a lot of issues, or in other words is not exactly what (someone) expected, or in other words (my words) sucks. That's all. I can't understand what is the problem here.Igro wrote:This post was created by Waldorf guy. Did you forget it? Calm down.
-
- KVRAF
- 5542 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
C'mon, let give us the clue. Post here something, then we see. Lets fu..g compare. Post your sync saw. Don't trash now with supersaw.keel wrote:Then u dont have any clue what sound fatIgro wrote:totally no.keel wrote:You kidding me, right?Igro wrote:Just simple audio sample of sync saw, usnison and delay:
Largo SyncSaw.mp3 - 1.22MB
Sounds massive. I love Largo.
Last edited by Igro on Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
chicken muffin chicken muffin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=137792
- Banned
- 998 posts since 28 Jan, 2007
is it just me, or is there no fast previous/next way to change wavforms 
-
- KVRAF
- 5542 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
1)just drag the waveschicken muffin wrote:is it just me, or is there no fast previous/next way to change wavforms
2)There is numbers below the waves, they can be changed in the same way.
-
- KVRist
- 136 posts since 9 Nov, 2006
great! sounds like good hardware!Igro wrote:Just simple audio sample of sync saw, usnison and delay:
Largo SyncSaw.mp3 - 1.22MB
Sounds massive. I love Largo.
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced
-
- KVRist
- 136 posts since 9 Nov, 2006
again...No! There is a difference in saying imho and shouting out: This synth sucks!IncarnateX wrote:So are statements like:filterfilter wrote:hmm, are you right? NO!!IncarnateX wrote:Hmm...I think you mean that many people can not tell what YOU think is a good synth apart from what YOU think is a bad synth...and actually...filterfilter wrote:Absolutely! Imho (I know this sounds arrogant) many people just can't set a good synth apart from a bad synth!
that makes sense and would not be arrogant, because fact is that other people is not you!
Unless, of course, that you really mean that your oppinions are over and above all others and thus define what IS a good synth and what IS a bad synth in general. Now THAT would be arrogant...and infantile...and pretty stupid!
statements like: "somebody should tell the truth: this synth really suck!" are arrogant, infantile, stupid!
Two wrongs do not make a right! That other people are foolish is no excuse for being foolish yourself.filterfilter wrote:Absolutely! Imho (I know this sounds arrogant) many people just can't set a good synth apart from a bad synth!
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced
-
- KVRAF
- 4585 posts since 2 Nov, 2006
I think anything that is said here is "IMHO"...filterfilter wrote:again...No! There is a difference in saying imho and shouting out: This synth sucks!
For example: Largo sucks, IMHO.
-
- KVRian
- 1084 posts since 7 Jan, 2008 from Finland
i want know if largo saw and pulse waves sounds same than Blofeld ? and i ask also this for filtter ? i found some nice sounding patch (i mean saw and pulse sounds nice in these patches) what uses these waves and of course of filter. but this seems very cpu hungry plugin.
(so hungry i cannot use this plugin anything) but currently i know synths what i like much more. ps. i only test now with demo version but still. ps. also this feature makes my very angry why even today most of softsynths lfo rates are not hz and time values are also in ms. in these synths what i like i think time values are human understandable. Even nicest (at least to me) analog emulations have this.
(so hungry i cannot use this plugin anything) but currently i know synths what i like much more. ps. i only test now with demo version but still. ps. also this feature makes my very angry why even today most of softsynths lfo rates are not hz and time values are also in ms. in these synths what i like i think time values are human understandable. Even nicest (at least to me) analog emulations have this.
Last edited by JPQ on Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 5817 posts since 8 May, 2008 from ssssskipping ......... I left you there
MaxSynths wrote:Sorry Waldorf guy. I was under crack. Largo is a great instrument (after all "largo" means "large"). But please, my beloved newbies, focus your attention on the synth and stop commenting on my opinion. After all I've only used different words to say what other people said before and after me: Largo - in his current incarnation - is not perfect or, in other words, have a lot of issues, or in other words is not exactly what (someone) expected, or in other words (my words) sucks. That's all. I can't understand what is the problem here.Igro wrote:This post was created by Waldorf guy. Did you forget it? Calm down.
Largo means "long" .
Don't turn your back on us , our beloved Yoda .
Don't you have a synth yourself to focus your attention on ? .
Very poor .
-
- KVRer
- 27 posts since 28 Feb, 2004 from Oulunsalo, Finland
they might sound the same, or not. buy blofeld and largo.JPQ wrote:i want know if largo saw and pulse waves sounds same than Blofeld ? and i ask also this for filtter ? i found some nice sounding patch (i mean saw and pulse sounds nice in these patches) what uses these waves and of course of filter. but this seems very cpu hungry plugin.
there are no situation where software sounds the same as hardware.
in my system, largo isn't eating up resourses at all, when using all 4 parts.
Jani :: Mystery Islands
w: http://www.mysteryislands-music.com
Access Virus Revealed Volume 2 now available!
w: http://www.mysteryislands-music.com
Access Virus Revealed Volume 2 now available!
-
- Banned
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
No there is not, the difference is like between saying:filterfilter wrote:again...No! There is a difference in saying imho and shouting out: This synth sucks!IncarnateX wrote:So are statements like:filterfilter wrote:hmm, are you right? NO!!IncarnateX wrote:Hmm...I think you mean that many people can not tell what YOU think is a good synth apart from what YOU think is a bad synth...and actually...filterfilter wrote:Absolutely! Imho (I know this sounds arrogant) many people just can't set a good synth apart from a bad synth!
that makes sense and would not be arrogant, because fact is that other people is not you!
Unless, of course, that you really mean that your oppinions are over and above all others and thus define what IS a good synth and what IS a bad synth in general. Now THAT would be arrogant...and infantile...and pretty stupid!
statements like: "somebody should tell the truth: this synth really suck!" are arrogant, infantile, stupid!
Two wrongs do not make a right! That other people are foolish is no excuse for being foolish yourself.filterfilter wrote:Absolutely! Imho (I know this sounds arrogant) many people just can't set a good synth apart from a bad synth!
1) People are idiots because they do not share my oppinion
2) IMHO people are idiots because they do not share my oppinion
so no, the "message" is still arrogant, infantile and stupid!
-
- KVRAF
- 14450 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
Naively or otherwise I think Massive is its closest competitor.
I much prefer the look of Massive and the whole GUI including patch organising etc....but I prefer the sound of Largo.... However there is no way I can justify the current price. At the very least it needs to be at the same price as Massive for me to consider buying it. But thanks for the demo, allows us to find out for ourselves first hand.
rsp
I much prefer the look of Massive and the whole GUI including patch organising etc....but I prefer the sound of Largo.... However there is no way I can justify the current price. At the very least it needs to be at the same price as Massive for me to consider buying it. But thanks for the demo, allows us to find out for ourselves first hand.
rsp