Record: New DAW from Propellerheads

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

X-Soul wrote: Reason have graintable, subtractive, fm, phase distortion, sampling, hypersampling, wavetable, waveshaping. How much do we miss then? Physical modelling, additive and granular - most of commercial musicians use them, huh?
Yes, commercial musicians use them. Professional sound design firms use a LOT of variety in their sound creation. Does Reason have anything to compete with Stylus RMX, Omnisphere, Zebra, etc.? No, it doesn't. These are professional tools that are used in mainstream pro productions every day. Not just a few, but all over the place.

Reason does have many synth TYPES, but each synth type is quite limited compared to other things out there. I'm not saying the Reason synths aren't powerful or good. They can be. But Reason does not present the best of the sampling world by far, or the best of the FM world. It can DO those things, but not at the level of the available VST plugins. And those VST plugins I'm speaking of are the ones that do get used every day because of their power. For dance music, perhaps the Reason synths are enough. For the rest of the world, that's probably not the case.
Not all types of effects are there
Which ones? You know you can recreate alot of missed fx'es there with combinator. Multiband compression for example - easily.
Sure you can. But you're still missing quite a bit of the power available elsewhere. There is no very high quality reverb that competes with Altiverb and Breverb and others, for instance. The plugins in Reason, even the good ones, lack flexibility and options. Again, I'm not saying they are BAD. I'm just saying that they don't measure up to many of the VST plugins that are out there. You won't find any complex visualization, no noise reduction, no audio tuning of any kind, and very little in the way of off-the-wall creative effects. The amp simulation is severely limited compared to even just one plugin(name the one you want, from Guitar Rig to TH-1 to Amplitube, or whatever- all better than the entire amp package in the Reason/Record package) in VST form. Maybe it has the effects YOU want, but let's not pretend that it has a full compliment of effects, even with creative routing.
Audio editing is not there in any form(and Record does almost nothing except very very basic editing). The MIDI tools that exist in hosts like Cubase aren't there.
It limits reason in sound possibilities somehow? You cant make Tchaikovskiy/Beethoven/Bach (put any other great composer) arrangement there? It impossible to make a real sound masterpiece there? This is a rhetorical questions.
Did I say it is impossible to make a real sound masterpiece? You said: "But Reason have almost everything for all music/sound ideas realisation, isnt it?"

Reason and/or Record lack any type of tuning, spectral management and editing, has no groove quantize, no way of pocketing tracks(which is done on almost every commercial release these days), no visualization or advanced metering, no way to tame clipping or do anything else that requires sample level editing, etc. It goes on and on. No advanced crossfading, no nothing. VERY limited. These are things that DO affect sound and the quality of the recordings. And again, if you are making some electronic, pattern based music, or whatever, Reason may be sufficient. But as I said above, let's not pretend it can do things it can't.
Why do you think so many people ReWire it to their main host?

To use audio tracks and use some little better quality vsts/ their daw sequencer is more handy for them/hardware/big studio which handles many projects from different artists.
No, it's because Reason can't do all that is needed for their productions. I mentioned many things above, and there is more.
There is SO MUCH that is not there. It's not just things to make work easier or faster, but things to manipulate the sound as well as creating the sound. ... There is a TON of sound potential that it doesn't reach into.
Really a ton? Maybe 1-5% if to be realistic? Which can be compencated with good sampling libraries or some smart device routing. Maybe its easier to think for you that Reason is limited in sound, because you cannot accept it or you just wont think that you can be wrong? I agree tho that it lacks features for a big studio integration. But lacks only a little (few synth types and audio recording which Record delivers) in individual studio based on soft synthesis only.
I'm not wrong. And Record adds very little for audio besides recording. And the quality of sample libraries for Reason are nowhere near the quality of things like VSL, Chris Hein/Scarbee, EWQLSO, WIVI, and others.

There's nothing wrong with Reason being limited. There's nothing wrong with thinking it's a great app(I think it is). There is nothing wrong with thinking that it has everything needed for YOU. But, once again, let's not pretend it's something it's not.

I'm not criticizing your tools. I enjoyed using Reason in the times I've used it. It's a fun app, and has lots of possibilities. I'm just being realistic.

Oh, and Record is still a mess ergonomically(in case anyone lost the topic of this thread!).

Brent
My host is better than your host

Post

koolkeys wrote:
X-Soul wrote:I think I will forgot soon what Cubase\VST is after Record + Reason usage. Almost perfect tool for pure software music creation. Great sound in right hands, inspiring gui, amazing workflow. What else do you need?
VST Support. Among other things. No way that this replaces Cubase. Maybe for some people, but there is no comparison in functionality.

But seriously, without VST support, there is no way I would use the combo exclusively. YMMV.

Oh, and I still think Record is an ergonomics mess. Again, YMMV.

Brent


And Cubase isn't an Ergonomics Mess ?
It sure feels that way to me. Convoluted, bloated, cumbersome and totally uninspiring.
Much like you though ...... YMMV .

Post

FaX wrote:
koolkeys wrote:
X-Soul wrote:I think I will forgot soon what Cubase\VST is after Record + Reason usage. Almost perfect tool for pure software music creation. Great sound in right hands, inspiring gui, amazing workflow. What else do you need?
VST Support. Among other things. No way that this replaces Cubase. Maybe for some people, but there is no comparison in functionality.

But seriously, without VST support, there is no way I would use the combo exclusively. YMMV.

Oh, and I still think Record is an ergonomics mess. Again, YMMV.

Brent


And Cubase isn't an Ergonomics Mess ?
It sure feels that way to me. Convoluted, bloated, cumbersome and totally uninspiring.
Much like you though ...... YMMV .
Not like Record. Have you spent much time with the latest versions? It's actually very streamlined and very clean. It's nothing like Record in that sense. You may not agree, and that is fine with me. But I find it funny when people consider Cubase bloated when it has one of the cleanest interfaces around for a full featured DAW host.

People work differently indeed. But I absolutely think that the latest versions of Cubase are very clean, very easy to work with(every host has a learning curve, mind you), and have some creative and inspiring tools that aren't found anywhere else. The workflow aspect is MUCH better than it used to be.

When watching videos on Record(keep in mind that I also have it and have used it and continue to test it out), they say that it's designed for musicians instead of audio engineers. Really? Then why did they make two thirds of the program to be designed around the very things that audio engineers use every day? How many musicians are familiar with an SSL console and racks of outboard gear?

I think they are trying to hard, and in the end, I personally think it's a mess.

Brent
My host is better than your host

Post

koolkeys wrote: When watching videos on Record(keep in mind that I also have it and have used it and continue to test it out), they say that it's designed for musicians instead of audio engineers. Really? Then why did they make two thirds of the program to be designed around the very things that audio engineers use every day? How many musicians are familiar with an SSL console and racks of outboard gear?

I think they are trying to hard, and in the end, I personally think it's a mess.

Brent

+1

I wanted to like it, I wanted it to simplify my recording life like the marketing trumpets, but I couldn't stand to use it. All I ever seemed to do was squint and scroll.

I've used Sonar, Logic, PT LE, GBand, Cubase, Samplitude, and Live.

This is, IMO, the worst ergonomically and, ironically, was the hardest to use out of the box.
Signature blocked until 5000 posts made.

Post

X-Soul wrote: Hmm, its hard for you make some glitch sounds with reason synths?
I'm talkikng about effects like dBlue Glitch, Supertrigga, LiveCut, etc, which (among other things) rearrange in real time the content of audio files as they play (for example). No, you obviously can't do that with Reason's synths.
or make auto filter with matrix device?
That's possible, yes, but a fair amount of work. Especially compared to simply dragging a well-made auto-filter onto a track. Record is billed as being for folk who are new to audio software, beginners, and "musicians not engineers". So building your own stuff using complex behind the scenes routing and step sequencers in order to create simple audio effects is pretty much the opposite of what Propellerhead claim.

By the way, it's easier to do an auto-filter effect by routing audio through the Maelstrom synth...

... but all these solutions are essentially "workarounds" to make up for basic stuff that Reason/Record actually lacks.
You know you can recreate alot of missed fx'es there with combinator. Multiband compression for example - easily.
Wrong. Propellerhead's own expert James Bernard built and released a Multiband Compressor using the Combinator with a pile of EQs and Vocoders in it. It was a huge job. And it caused phasing problems, so was unusable. After much work he created a replacement that didn't cause these problems - a very big job. That is available to download from the Props website, and is well worth having. However, it still doesn't light a candle to pro quality mutiband effects that are available in RTAS and VST land, such as the Waves Linear Phase Multiband that is widely used in studios.

It's well known that I have advocated Reason on this forum for years, but we have to be real and honest about this. The Reason effects are mostly nowhere near as good as the widely used plugins used by professionals. I'm not saying that to knock Reason or to knock you. But it is simply ignorant to say that a good multiband is possible in Reason/Record. So they should add one as a bespoke unit pronto.

Other effects that are fairly standard, particularly in an audio-recoding DAW:

+ Noise Reduction
+ Surgical type linear phase parametric EQ (much more precise than MClass one, for removing unwanted frequencies/noise)
+ De esser
+ Convolution Reverb
+ Multitap Delay with pan/modulation controls per stage
+ Bespoke multimode filter
+ AutoTune (a staple in any recording studio) - nothing for this in Record.

I'm not saying that I would like to see Record host VSTs - in general I wouldn't. But I would like to see it have a full compliment of its own effects, which is after all what Propellerhead (falsely) claim it has.
Last edited by headquest on Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

X-Soul wrote: And what Reason have that all vst hosts just fails to deliver - unlimited signal routing possibilities.
True. But in many cases the use of this routing potential is just to spend time building combinator units which are basically workarounds for the lack of standard basic features other programmes have. The Multiband is a good example. And there are loads more. In a typical VST effect plugin this routing is handled internally by the programmer (or "engineer" in Prop speak...) while the "musician" can then simply use the effect to improve their recording/music.

With the additional routing layer introduced by the new mixer being seperate from the Rack... well that I'm sure opens up some crazy routing possibilities. Perhaps I'm hugely unimaginative... but right now I can't actually think of a single practical use for this "power".

Surely it would have been better if they had replaced the ReMix 14 track mixer from Reason with a 14 track SSL (with all the effects, etc), with the option to drop down another 14 tracks, then another, etc, all in one mixer WITHIN THE RACK. That would have HUGELY simplified the programme, brought it back to two easy to understand windows, and enabled Reason songs to be properly imported into Record.

It would also mean that you could still use those great MClass Mastering units post-mixer. With Record those units are unusable because the SSL is hardwired to the audio output (which is actually a whole lot LESS flexible than Reason of course). A strange decision, and I think it is the main cause of many of us finding the programme an ergonomic mess.

Post

Stop it. I dont think I can take it anymore.
I dont know if I want this thing anymore now.
You may have just saved me $ 149.
Its really good to see the for and againsts.
I think once the initial excitement has died
down between end of beta phase and actual
physical product in store the novelty might wear off.
Which means I can put my hard earned on something else.
Then again I am up for a new DAW since the death of T3.
I must admit these posts from Koolkeys and Headquest especially
have more than touched a nerve than in the previous 93 pages.

Thank you guys for your informative analysis and I dont
mean that in a condescending way.
Oh by the way I do own R4.
Is this the death of another DAW due to the DEVS not listening
to the user base!!!!!

Cheers

Post

randyandyvandaman wrote:Is this the death of another DAW due to the DEVS not listening to the user base!!!!!

Cheers
I don't think so but IMO it will not sell as well as the Props might have liked. It's not a good time to slip up either the competition never stays still in this market.

Post

Bah. Logic 9 is better!




:hihi:

Post

TristezaOrange wrote:Bah. Logic 9 is better!




:hihi:
:hihi:

Seriously though for many on MAC it may very well be. I think Logic offers much more value for money compared to a Reason + Record price outlay for MAC users. Way more to offer with Logic IMO. :wink:

Still Record is definitely a nice addition to the DAW market but not a game changer. The marketing for it promises much more than it delivers IMHO. :shrug:

Post

Nice touch using an example of competition that stood still for so long that users were starting petitions. ;)

I'd love to try out the new Logic, but AFAIK they don't do trial versions at all. You have to buy it to find out what it's like. Nooooot happening.

The features look nice though. Apple continues their tradition of p*ssing off Mac-supportive software companies. Steinberg became very Windows-friendly after Apple bought Emagic, Adobe became very Windows-friendly after the release of Final Cut Pro (gee, I wonder why I have to boot into Windows on my Mac to use 64-bit Photoshop), and I expect NI and IK Multimedia to become more Windows-friendly after Logic was updated with this rather shameless AmpliTube/Guitar Rig ripoff.
christianmusicmaker wrote:Seriously though for many on MAC it may very well be. I think Logic offers much more value for money compared to a Reason + Record price outlay for MAC users. Way more to offer with Logic IMO. :wink:
You think Logic would be that cheap if Apple didn't also sell Macs with gargantuan profit margins? Seriously... it's just part of their lock-in tactic. This is what they do. First they lure you in and make you pay 25% Apple Tax on a generic Chinese-made PC with an Apple logo on it. Once you're in the trap, you'll find that they're offering all this OSX-exclusive software for prices that aggressively undercut the competition (because it's already subsidized by the hefty markup on the hardware you bought). There's Logic, there's iWork, there's Final Cut Studio, and of course they just happen to cost much less than competing products. So you buy them and then you're hooked, and you can't go back to PC because the apps you're hooked on aren't available for that platform. So you keep buying Macs, Macs and more Macs.

Yeah sure, Logic is so much value for money. And look! I just found this Nokia phone from Verizon for one dollar! I bet there's no catch at all! They just want to be nice to me. Take that, AT&T and Sony Ericsson!
Last edited by blank/diod on Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

blank/diod wrote:
Nice touch using an example of competition that stood still for so long that users were starting petitions. ;)
Heh.... hmmmm I could say the same about the Props and their really slow speed of development over the years :hihi:
I'd love to try out the new Logic, but AFAIK they don't do trial versions at all. You have to buy it to find out what it's like. Nooooot happening.

The features look nice though. Apple continues their tradition of p*ssing off Mac-supportive software companies. Steinberg became very Windows-friendly after Apple bought Emagic, Adobe became very Windows-friendly after the release of Final Cut Pro (gee, I wonder why I have to boot into Windows on my Mac to use 64-bit Photoshop), and I expect NI and IK Multimedia to become more Windows-friendly after Logic was updated with this rather shameless AmpliTube/Guitar Rig ripoff.
So are you saying you will not get Logic or not? :hihi:

Kidding, just kidding :)

Post

christianmusicmaker wrote:Heh.... hmmmm I could say the same about the Props and their really slow speed of development over the years
You could. ;) Then again they're a small company with some 30 employees, not a massive global corporation like Apple who have thousands of developers on their payroll.
So are you saying you will not get Logic or not? :hihi:

Kidding, just kidding :)
Well, if I get the opportunity to evaluate it thouroughly at some point and end up liking it, I might consider replacing Cubase, but without a trial version I'll never know. Am I supposed to fork out $499 because the screenshots look pretty? :lol:

Post

I played with the betas, and honestly I found myself wanting VST effect support. I dont expect the props to change their stance, but I wont consider it unless they do. I have too much invested in VST/AU now. I still find it handy to write out an idea in reason, and rewire that project into a proper audio enabled app, so it didnt really help my workflow much.

Post

While ReWire works for me I don't really see the point either.

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”