Since I have a variable-duty pulse (and the 303 doesn't), I need to decide if it's cooler to have the rez drop-off be the same no matter what the duty cycle size is, or if I want it to be dependent on the phase offset.mistertoast wrote:Interesting. I now slide the resonance down during the cycle. It may not be what the 303 does, but it's pretty cool.
The advantage I see to the latter approach is the assymetry. A duty cycle of 10% would have a very short period of resonance while a duty cycle of 90% would have tons of it.
Would make PWM more lively.
