Analysis Lady Gaga - Paparazzi
-
- KVRist
- 212 posts since 5 Jun, 2006
http://www.queensongs.info/forum/forum. ... =4&shift=0
I didn't understand one thing about her progression.
Usually you will make the chorus with a strong progression not the verse, meaning the transition between chords will have notes in common.
In Paparazzi, the verse has a very strong chord progression in C minor.
Verse:
Cm - Ab - Cm (2 notes in common) then Cm - Ab - Fm( 2 notes in common).
In the chorus modulates to original key of the song Ab but the progression is not as strong like in the verse.
Ab - Eb - Fm - Db(last chord changes to Cm), Only Fm to Db has a strong progression.
Why this approach works as well, because of the modulation?
Thanks.
By the way, awesome site Queens' one.
Lots of good info.
I didn't understand one thing about her progression.
Usually you will make the chorus with a strong progression not the verse, meaning the transition between chords will have notes in common.
In Paparazzi, the verse has a very strong chord progression in C minor.
Verse:
Cm - Ab - Cm (2 notes in common) then Cm - Ab - Fm( 2 notes in common).
In the chorus modulates to original key of the song Ab but the progression is not as strong like in the verse.
Ab - Eb - Fm - Db(last chord changes to Cm), Only Fm to Db has a strong progression.
Why this approach works as well, because of the modulation?
Thanks.
By the way, awesome site Queens' one.
Lots of good info.
- KVRAF
- 3944 posts since 7 May, 2004 from behind his workbench
-
- KVRist
- 80 posts since 10 Jun, 2005
"Strong" chord progression does not mean you have common notes between chords.
Example: some of the most useful chord progressions, especially in a cadence are IV-V-I or II-V-I, in both major and minor keys.
IV and V don't have any common tones, II and V have 1.
Or take the deceptive cadence: V-VI. Very strong chord progression, no common tones.
In tonal music (classical), "strong" chord progressions are circle-of-fifths progressions and the derivatives. Basically:
(VII)-III-VI-II-V-I, with IV being grouped with II and vii diminished with V. Additions are III-IV, IV-I, V-VI, VI-V. Those progressions are "strong" and some of them have common tones, some don't.
To now use your example:
In Ab: Ab - Eb - Fm - Db
is I-V-VI-IV.
This is a typical "strong" chord progression -- tonic, dominant, deceptive into VI (functioning as tonic substitution here), subdominant. You just add a nice D-T function at the end, and it could not be more "classical."
Example: some of the most useful chord progressions, especially in a cadence are IV-V-I or II-V-I, in both major and minor keys.
IV and V don't have any common tones, II and V have 1.
Or take the deceptive cadence: V-VI. Very strong chord progression, no common tones.
In tonal music (classical), "strong" chord progressions are circle-of-fifths progressions and the derivatives. Basically:
(VII)-III-VI-II-V-I, with IV being grouped with II and vii diminished with V. Additions are III-IV, IV-I, V-VI, VI-V. Those progressions are "strong" and some of them have common tones, some don't.
To now use your example:
In Ab: Ab - Eb - Fm - Db
is I-V-VI-IV.
This is a typical "strong" chord progression -- tonic, dominant, deceptive into VI (functioning as tonic substitution here), subdominant. You just add a nice D-T function at the end, and it could not be more "classical."
- KVRian
- 589 posts since 19 Jan, 2008 from Bethlehem, PA USA
she is a virtuoso with an incredible knowledge of music theory. she knows how to work it for sure
it is an amazing song with an even more amazing music video; at the beginning of the video you can hear her riffing out on the piano
it is an amazing song with an even more amazing music video; at the beginning of the video you can hear her riffing out on the piano
Last edited by wetdentist on Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
my newest sounds:
https://soundcloud.com/the-das-kaput
Cakewalk by BandLab, Komplete 13, Maschine 2 (MKI & Jam), Fathom Synth, Guitars, Jam Origin MIDI Guitar, EXH Superego+ etc
https://soundcloud.com/the-das-kaput
Cakewalk by BandLab, Komplete 13, Maschine 2 (MKI & Jam), Fathom Synth, Guitars, Jam Origin MIDI Guitar, EXH Superego+ etc
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
Sometimes music theory can't explain what we like and praise.
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
-
- KVRAF
- 4585 posts since 2 Nov, 2006
That's why I suggest to the OP to take a look to Queen scores: you'll find a lot of unusual progressions and also "weird" stuff which sounds great. The same is true for the great composers of the past (Chopin and Beethoven come to mind): if you look deep in the scores you'll find things which today could be considered "wrong" (Chopin, Ballade Op.23).eduardo_b wrote:Sometimes music theory can't explain what we like and praise.
- KVRAF
- 7791 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater

Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
-
- KVRist
- 224 posts since 18 May, 2006
Surely that doesn't mean it's worthless to try now and again, though?eduardo_b wrote:Sometimes music theory can't explain what we like and praise.
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
No, of course not. I'm only pointing out that there's a difference between theory and application, and they don't always align.icelizarrd wrote:Surely that doesn't mean it's worthless to try now and again, though?eduardo_b wrote:Sometimes music theory can't explain what we like and praise.
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
-
- Banned
- 4072 posts since 7 Nov, 2007
I think this track is amazing. Not because I think it is good music, I don't. Not because I think this chick is a genius, I don't.
But...
I think this track is amazing because, as annoying and stupid as this song is, it is still less annoying than, "toms diner."
Analyze that!
But...
I think this track is amazing because, as annoying and stupid as this song is, it is still less annoying than, "toms diner."
Analyze that!
-
- KVRian
- 503 posts since 24 Nov, 2008
I'm not familiar with the song, though I've heard it once, but that verse to chorus progression you gave makes perfect sense.
Given just those chords, they all belong to the scale of Ab Major, with modes changing between verse and chorus. But all the chords up to that Db are also in C natural minor - to get back to the verse, it just plays Cm instead of Db.
Cm and Ab (i-VI) is the 3rd mode of Ab, but can also be C natural minor without the D note, which is flat in Ab Major.
When it finally plays a Ab - Fm, it sets it up for the change to Ab 1st mode.(same interval change as Cm - Ab, except for Ab)
There probably is a D note in the song's verse, but the basic progression is just modes of Ab. There may even be other accidental passing-notes played between chord changes that suggest other keys.
If you don't get what I'm saying, take a look at interval, chord root, and scale/mode tonic basics, as already suggested.
And you really shouldn't be without a generator for scales from chords, chords from scales, like Chordware.
Given just those chords, they all belong to the scale of Ab Major, with modes changing between verse and chorus. But all the chords up to that Db are also in C natural minor - to get back to the verse, it just plays Cm instead of Db.
Cm and Ab (i-VI) is the 3rd mode of Ab, but can also be C natural minor without the D note, which is flat in Ab Major.
When it finally plays a Ab - Fm, it sets it up for the change to Ab 1st mode.(same interval change as Cm - Ab, except for Ab)
There probably is a D note in the song's verse, but the basic progression is just modes of Ab. There may even be other accidental passing-notes played between chord changes that suggest other keys.
If you don't get what I'm saying, take a look at interval, chord root, and scale/mode tonic basics, as already suggested.
And you really shouldn't be without a generator for scales from chords, chords from scales, like Chordware.
-
- KVRist
- 93 posts since 2 Mar, 2006 from Newark, CA
It's great to know theory and be able to analyze a particular chord progression, melody, counter melody, harmonies and rhythm. As a musician, I love deconstructing a track to see how a song is built. For me, theory is a useful reference guide, never a rule that must be followed.
In the end, I like a song if I can feel it. Certain chord progressions, melodies and rhythms invoke a strong, positive feeling in me; while other music invokes absolutely nothing, or worse, a negative feeling.
In the end, I like a song if I can feel it. Certain chord progressions, melodies and rhythms invoke a strong, positive feeling in me; while other music invokes absolutely nothing, or worse, a negative feeling.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 212 posts since 5 Jun, 2006
I agree with you 100% groovesys, help us out doing that.(desconstruction)
There are other threads like that in this forum where musicians like you could share your knowledge for others new to theory, like me.
You would be more than welcome to share your thoughts,knowledge and ideias.
Thanks.
There are other threads like that in this forum where musicians like you could share your knowledge for others new to theory, like me.
You would be more than welcome to share your thoughts,knowledge and ideias.
Thanks.
-
- KVRist
- 427 posts since 24 Sep, 2009
is this sarcasm or is this true?wetdentist wrote:she is a virtuoso with an incredible knowledge of music theory. she knows how to work it for sure
it is an amazing song with an even more amazing music video; at the beginning of the video you can hear her riffing out on the piano