XT Software

NAS · Post by **NAS** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:05 pm

djsubject wrote:
NAS wrote: Sorry that isn't impolite and if you think so tough
Ditto about the Censoring

Excuse me
Are you saying you are going to Censor me because you disagree with me ?

I think you are treading a very thin line with that comment

NAS

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:10 pm

NAS wrote:
djsubject wrote:
NAS wrote: Sorry that isn't impolite and if you think so tough
Ditto about the Censoring
Excuse me
Are you saying you are going to Censor me because you disagree with me ?

I think you are treading a very thin line with that comment

NAS

only you could draw that conclusion from those comments!

let me brake it down a bit simpler for you

if YOU don't like MY Censoring methods, TOUGH!!

more of a highway than a thin line IMHO

Subz

NAS · Post by **NAS** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:14 pm

Sorry ditto about the censoring doesn't imply that at all

So why not explain what you mean't in the first place

So you censoring posts is entirely at your discretion is it and it is tough for anyone else right
Like i said thin line

Isn't it rather surprising how a rather serious issue of posts being deleted in the forum here because they don't follow the company line (An open forum i might add) is being bandied around by you (The moderator of said forum) like it is some kind of big joke

Isn't this exactly what jens was driven out of moderating this forum for ?

NAS

engine · Post by **engine** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:36 am

"blah blah drama blah blah blah"

would you be so kind and stop that, please. thanks.

ontopic:
i think the uservoice feedback idea is good, but this forum here at kvr has collected a huge amount of knowledge (incl. bug-reports, voted features, etc.).

just one single day reading here will give anybody a good overview about all the needs and fears of the majority of xt-users.

lets see if it helps...

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:20 pm

cool, many of the requests are marked as planned!

including Multi-core Support

Subz

NAS · Post by **NAS** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:26 pm

I wonder how long something stays under review until it is written off as not happening or planned

NAS

deleted · Post by **deleted** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:27 pm

DELETED

Igro · Post by **Igro** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:33 pm

So Knut is the new coder for XT now?

deleted · Post by **deleted** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:34 pm

DELETED

deleted · Post by **deleted** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:35 pm

DELETED

NAS · Post by **NAS** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:52 pm

michi_mak wrote:
NAS wrote:I wonder how long something stays under review until it is written off as not happening or planned

NAS
didn't YOU tell me to be happy with what we got?

Erm yeah
And what has that got to do with wondering about how long something stays under review ?
Are you just trying to pick an arguement for no reason whatsoever ?

NAS

bfloyd6969 · Post by **bfloyd6969** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:23 pm

We can still be happy with what we got, and still get excited if things are going to get added or imporoved upon

druid · Post by **druid** » Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:28 am

If I may be a little cynical, I wonder if quite a few posted on there and voted for XT2 to come more in line with XT1 features, would it really be done ..? I feel like if it would, wouldn't it have been done already.

Still, I might try and compile a list of major features missing from XT2 that were in XT1, and see if they can be voted for.

But I'm not sure I'll get around to it, since I've sort of moved on. If anyone else does though, I'll happily vote for such things.

jonnyG · Post by **jonnyG** » Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:06 am

druid wrote:If I may be a little cynical, I wonder if quite a few posted on there and voted for XT2 to come more in line with XT1 features, would it really be done ..? I feel like if it would, wouldn't it have been done already.

Still, I might try and compile a list of major features missing from XT2 that were in XT1, and see if they can be voted for.

But I'm not sure I'll get around to it, since I've sort of moved on. If anyone else does though, I'll happily vote for such things.

I'd venture to suggest that anyone who ever wanted to see XT1's features / mindset in XT2 may as well head over to the new place and politely pop in a feature request or two. I get the feeling that KVR's XT forum is regarded as pretty far out of the loop these days.

ZonderP · Post by **ZonderP** » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:59 am

jonnyG wrote:...
I get the feeling that KVR's XT forum is regarded as pretty far out of the loop these days.

Yep, me too.

Now there is even a new 'Support form' there on http://www.energy-xt.com/index.php?id=0300 for submitting questions, suggestions and bug reports.

Anyone already seen the new design of the energyXT site?

XT Software

KVR Audio

Uservoice feedback forum