Thanks Aloysius,
The only other VST I have out is NCL EQ. It's a general purpose EQ, but it's been a bit neglected the last few months. I'll have to get around to doing some updates at some point.
Phase EQ support (update 9/11)
Downloaded! Thanks again Matthew!-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1275 posts since 9 Jan, 2006
If anyone was having issues on multi-core machines this new update should fix them.
I have a dual-core, but XT2 only uses one core shielding me from such problems
Any free/cheap multi-core enabled hosts anyone could recomend for me to test with?
I have a dual-core, but XT2 only uses one core shielding me from such problems
Any free/cheap multi-core enabled hosts anyone could recomend for me to test with?-
- KVRAF
- 4801 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
I really, really like this, updated version seems to start-up faster on my system - thanks a lot. So is this linear phase?
If I would suggest anything, rename "--" to "bypass", pretty cosmetic, but would make things clearer for first time lookers. HP freq range could be a little wider maybe?
If I would suggest anything, rename "--" to "bypass", pretty cosmetic, but would make things clearer for first time lookers. HP freq range could be a little wider maybe?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1275 posts since 9 Jan, 2006
Thanks,
The filters in this are minimum phase. Linear phase would add latency and increase the CPU load a lot. I did get started on a linear phase version, but I generally prefer the sound of minimal phase and keeping zero latency is nice.
Perhaps "--" could be changed I'll give that some thought for sure. Also you're not the first person to ask for a wider range for the HP filter. Perhaps at some point that could be increased. However I think that'll have to wait until after the competition as it might be considered a re-working of a feature which'd be against the rules. For the time being if you want to increase the range of the filter you can manually input values in the text box under the frequency control.
Cheers,
Matt
The filters in this are minimum phase. Linear phase would add latency and increase the CPU load a lot. I did get started on a linear phase version, but I generally prefer the sound of minimal phase and keeping zero latency is nice.
Perhaps "--" could be changed I'll give that some thought for sure. Also you're not the first person to ask for a wider range for the HP filter. Perhaps at some point that could be increased. However I think that'll have to wait until after the competition as it might be considered a re-working of a feature which'd be against the rules. For the time being if you want to increase the range of the filter you can manually input values in the text box under the frequency control.
Cheers,
Matt