Uservoice feedback forum
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRAF
- 1669 posts since 4 Nov, 2007
Yes.funkadil wrote:Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
We all know it doesnt help anything.
-
- KVRAF
- 5540 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
If there is a new coder, then it will help for sure. Could be nice to see updates every Friday.Rottweiler wrote:Yes.funkadil wrote:Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
We all know it doesnt help anything.
-
- KVRAF
- 5540 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
Hi funkadil. In my post about meters, i meant volume meters. Jorgen responded to this and i made this request clearer.funkadil wrote:Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
-
- KVRist
- 344 posts since 14 Oct, 2005
fix all known bugs that are not system specific but appear on all daws, would be huge step
as it seems my request - comment dissapeared from the shiny new forum i,ll put it here instead,
obviously too vague and not an important enough "feature"
as it seems my request - comment dissapeared from the shiny new forum i,ll put it here instead,
obviously too vague and not an important enough "feature"
-
- KVRAF
- 1736 posts since 19 May, 2006 from Nomadic (Chicago and San Francisco mostly)
Yes, it is. Though I completely agree with you.1barEnuff wrote:obviously too vague
noise and beats: Negutyv Xeiro do people actually click these?
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
-
- KVRAF
- 2029 posts since 21 Jul, 2004
okay so you mean you want to know the exact numbers and not just what the current meters show? it just looked like you were saying there wasn't a volume meter which there obviously was.Igro wrote:Hi funkadil. In my post about meters, i meant volume meters. Jorgen responded to this and i made this request clearer.funkadil wrote:Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
Do not lick the fablanky
-
- KVRAF
- 5540 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
I meant not fader values meter, but signal strength meter. You know those fancy small lines which staying for a few seconds on meter surface till signal getting stronger and they always updated. So i wish to see them in numerical format as well, as in all DAWs.funkadil wrote:okay so you mean you want to know the exact numbers and not just what the current meters show? it just looked like you were saying there wasn't a volume meter which there obviously was.Igro wrote:Hi funkadil. In my post about meters, i meant volume meters. Jorgen responded to this and i made this request clearer.funkadil wrote:Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
-
- KVRist
- 490 posts since 9 Dec, 2008
This would be nice to have...Igro wrote: I meant not fader values meter, but signal strength meter. You know those fancy small lines which staying for a few seconds on meter surface till signal getting stronger and they always updated. So i wish to see them in numerical format as well, as in all DAWs.
I would like to go further and have actual values shown on the mixer strip. Thing is, the mixer strip is already pretty small so I don't think they would fit (legable anyways). Maybe a couple indents that we know - say 0db, -6 db, and -18db, or the like.
-
- KVRAF
- 5851 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
I think this is really great, a move in the right direction!
-
- KVRian
- 644 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
The new uservoice forum needs updating because two of the planned feature requests are now completed (step through quantize values & horizontal scroll bar behaviour) - or are they waiting until an official release?
-
- KVRian
- 769 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
I guess so!hudson_m4000 wrote:The new uservoice forum needs updating because two of the planned feature requests are now completed (step through quantize values & horizontal scroll bar behaviour) - or are they waiting until an official release?
Wouldn't it be strange, if it was considered completed, although it is only available to those of use who are willing to try out betas?
P.S.: Another request is 'completed' too:
'Fix the bug where xtc clips merge drum tracks with same sample'
-
- KVRist
- 123 posts since 9 Mar, 2006
-
- KVRian
- 769 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
Some Ideas have now got the status 'Completed'.
So some of you may have some votes back again. (Happy voting!
)
The idea 'Load Modular Setup by Program Change' (just 3 votes currently!) has got the status 'Started'.
Edit:
My idea 'Fix the bug where xtc clips merge drum tracks with same sample' just got 1 vote and nevertheless was started and completed, so I should not be surprised about the priorities...
So some of you may have some votes back again. (Happy voting!
)The idea 'Load Modular Setup by Program Change' (just 3 votes currently!) has got the status 'Started'.
Edit:
My idea 'Fix the bug where xtc clips merge drum tracks with same sample' just got 1 vote and nevertheless was started and completed, so I should not be surprised about the priorities...