Sonar 8.5 - is matrix view worth it?
-
- KVRian
- 1305 posts since 30 Jan, 2004
Hi, everyone,
I'm considering an upgrade to Sonar 8.5.
It's only $99 for me to upgrade to the Studio edition, and it seems that the only difference is plugs and the new matrix view.
Since I have all of the plugs I need (or want), and not sure how dependent I'd be on the matrix view (though it does sound nice), would I be losing out on much by going with the Studio version?
I didn't use any kind of host like Live or Project 5 before, though I'm not saying I wouldn't - I just am used to writing in a more linear fashion.
Thanks a lot for any input,
- Paul
I'm considering an upgrade to Sonar 8.5.
It's only $99 for me to upgrade to the Studio edition, and it seems that the only difference is plugs and the new matrix view.
Since I have all of the plugs I need (or want), and not sure how dependent I'd be on the matrix view (though it does sound nice), would I be losing out on much by going with the Studio version?
I didn't use any kind of host like Live or Project 5 before, though I'm not saying I wouldn't - I just am used to writing in a more linear fashion.
Thanks a lot for any input,
- Paul
- Beware the Quoth
- 35520 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
I like the Matrix View in Project5, so I was rather happy when it came to Sonar. Even if you're used to a more linear method of working, it can be useful in generating ideas and fleshing out the structure of parts of a given project, but it really is a personal thing.
Its a real shame there doesnt seem to be an 8.5 demo. You near a store that give you a real-life demo?
Its a real shame there doesnt seem to be an 8.5 demo. You near a store that give you a real-life demo?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
I really should give the Matrix view a try... I can say that the step sequencer 2.0 is light years ahead of the previous version.
in another note, I noticed the other day that the Audio Snap seems to be missing the "Quantize to Pool" option that I made such heavy use of. Can anyone direct me as to how similar functionality can be acheived in the new audiosnap?
in another note, I noticed the other day that the Audio Snap seems to be missing the "Quantize to Pool" option that I made such heavy use of. Can anyone direct me as to how similar functionality can be acheived in the new audiosnap?
- KVRAF
- 12256 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
There are actually a lot of new features, including some huge and very useful improvements to the step sequencer (a big one for me!), Audio Snap 2, Media Browser, engine improvements, etc.PaulG wrote:
...it seems that the only difference is plugs and the new matrix view.
http://www.cakewalk.com/Products/SONAR/ ... Prod=SR8.5
I actually haven't spent much time with the Matrix because it doesn't really fit into my workflow, but I just got the December Sound on Sound magazine in the mail today and it has an article on the Matrix View that you may want to check out.
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Deepmind 12D | Slim Phatty | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+
-
- KVRian
- 623 posts since 24 Apr, 2003
I seem to remember seeing in one of the CW videos that the Quantize to Pool function isn't used anymore in AudioSnap2.0. Something about being able to quantize to anything now, somehow. I need to look into it, too.Stupid American Pig wrote:I really should give the Matrix view a try... I can say that the step sequencer 2.0 is light years ahead of the previous version.
in another note, I noticed the other day that the Audio Snap seems to be missing the "Quantize to Pool" option that I made such heavy use of. Can anyone direct me as to how similar functionality can be acheived in the new audiosnap?
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
hmm, that seems to be the case.chilln wrote:I seem to remember seeing in one of the CW videos that the Quantize to Pool function isn't used anymore in AudioSnap2.0. Something about being able to quantize to anything now, somehow. I need to look into it, too.Stupid American Pig wrote:I really should give the Matrix view a try... I can say that the step sequencer 2.0 is light years ahead of the previous version.
in another note, I noticed the other day that the Audio Snap seems to be missing the "Quantize to Pool" option that I made such heavy use of. Can anyone direct me as to how similar functionality can be acheived in the new audiosnap?
- Banned
- 121 posts since 17 Oct, 2002
I find the Sonar 8.5.1 matrix view extremely limited. I can't use it really. You can't record into it directly. This makes it ok if you are working off loop libraries cos you can drag loops in to cells from the media explorer. But if you record your own parts the workflow is horrible. You have to do all your recording in track view, then drag bits into the matrix view, then capture a matrix view performance back into the track view. Further, live performance is the ONLY way to build an arrangement in matrix view. And then the midi performance is not captured anywhere so can't be edited - only the resultant rendering to the track view. So in other words - the matrix view, which is supposed to be for composing and arranging, is extremely limited for composing and arranging.
As for the SoS article, I wasted $1.49 on the pdf - DON'T BOTHER.
As for the SoS article, I wasted $1.49 on the pdf - DON'T BOTHER.
-
- KVRist
- 33 posts since 12 Mar, 2005
I started to use the sonar8.5 but im sticking back with my Project5.2. The main reason when your playing live with the matrix cells, the timing to the next cell is so acurate. On sonar8.5 the timing to the next cell is not as good as p5. Even when your recording without the matrix on 8.5, the timing of any audio beats slips off a little and can be very fustrating. Team, I think you better start comming out with more problem solving updates to measure up the quality of the P5.2 No offense though.
- Banned
- 121 posts since 17 Oct, 2002
According to the feature/fix list for Sonar 8.5.2 (coming later this month) it looks like a lot has been done in the matrix view and media explorer. I'm pretty psyched.
-
Chuck E. Jesus Chuck E. Jesus https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=108246
- R.I.P.
- 7301 posts since 23 May, 2006 from in between a cornfield and a river
-
Chuck E. Jesus Chuck E. Jesus https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=108246
- R.I.P.
- 7301 posts since 23 May, 2006 from in between a cornfield and a river

