D H Miltz,Max,and Psy-T
November Contest: Gossip
- KVRAF
- 1818 posts since 5 Apr, 2002 from Seattle, WA, USA
People pretty much vote for who they want or don't want to win. The music or the theme are secondary I've found. People who are very chatty in the gossip section add +1 people who review everyone's tunes add +2.robojam wrote:Am I the only one who sees a lack of correlation between votes and angry entries in this contest which has a theme of angry? Not begrudging anyone their votes, but I have to say I'm surprised that the theme seems to have been kicked to the side as far as voting is concerned.
Maybe it's just me.
It's very predictable.
- KVRAF
- 2975 posts since 18 Sep, 2006 from Rosehill Cemetery
That is the point though, yes? Of course you vote for the track you feel is most representative and should therefore win. Of course, your own individual interpretation comes into play.Lady J wrote:
People pretty much vote for who they want or don't want to win.
You forgot the part about the enamoured old contest regulars voting for the young girl and their monthly participating buddies though.Lady J wrote:The music or the theme are secondary I've found. People who are very chatty in the gossip section add +1 people who review everyone's tunes add +2.
It's very predictable.
"a confession without need of absolution, without need of redemption"
- KVRAF
- 1818 posts since 5 Apr, 2002 from Seattle, WA, USA
vespers75 wrote:That is the point though, yes? Of course you vote for the track you feel is most representative and should therefore win. Of course, your own individual interpretation comes into play.Lady J wrote:
People pretty much vote for who they want or don't want to win.
You forgot the part about the enamoured old contest regulars voting for the young girl and their monthly participating buddies though.Lady J wrote:The music or the theme are secondary I've found. People who are very chatty in the gossip section add +1 people who review everyone's tunes add +2.
It's very predictable.
yes. now i must destroy YOU!
- KVRAF
- 5715 posts since 5 Aug, 2006 from UK - The Mudway Towns
In that case my music must really be crapLady J wrote:People pretty much vote for who they want or don't want to win. The music or the theme are secondary I've found. People who are very chatty in the gossip section add +1 people who review everyone's tunes add +2.robojam wrote:Am I the only one who sees a lack of correlation between votes and angry entries in this contest which has a theme of angry? Not begrudging anyone their votes, but I have to say I'm surprised that the theme seems to have been kicked to the side as far as voting is concerned.
Maybe it's just me.
It's very predictable.
I'm fairly chatty, try to do reviews as much as possible, but this month I think is the highest I've ever got. I'm usually bumping along the bottom
It wasn't me! (well, actually, it probably was) - apparently no longer an 'elderly', now a 'senior'! Is that promotion?
-
- KVRAF
- 4727 posts since 25 Mar, 2006 from The city by the bay
The only way to make this contest perfect would be for those in charge to implement an objective, completely fair method of judging the entries. It wouldn't improve one's chances any, mind you, but it would help to accept the inevitable outcome.
Oh, and thanks to Chuck and Knockman for the "dissenting" votes. The offer for food and lodging if you're ever in the lovely City By the Bay was just a joke, of course...
Oh, and thanks to Chuck and Knockman for the "dissenting" votes. The offer for food and lodging if you're ever in the lovely City By the Bay was just a joke, of course...
- KVRAF
- 5715 posts since 5 Aug, 2006 from UK - The Mudway Towns
Skinflint!rp314 wrote:TOh, and thanks to Chuck and Knockman for the "dissenting" votes. The offer for food and lodging if you're ever in the lovely City By the Bay was just a joke, of course...
It wasn't me! (well, actually, it probably was) - apparently no longer an 'elderly', now a 'senior'! Is that promotion?
-
LauraMichelJarre LauraMichelJarre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=158959
- KVRist
- 437 posts since 1 Sep, 2007 from Oz
You're right. Difficult themes turn these contests to anarchy. The conventional idea is to please people with one's recordings, and this month that idea was reversed to angering people with one's recordings. In a reversal situation, the rules become a paradox, or ironic, or a contradiction.robojam wrote:Am I the only one who sees a lack of correlation between votes and angry entries in this contest which has a theme of angry? Not begrudging anyone their votes, but I have to say I'm surprised that the theme seems to have been kicked to the side as far as voting is concerned.
Maybe it's just me.
You either follow the rules and anger the voters, and then lose votes. Or break the rules and anger the entrants, and then lose votes. Both ways you lose
I figured that so many people hate musical theatre outside the theatre itself that a song with someone being angry about musical theatre written in a musical theatre style would find some approval. Treat an ironic theme with irony. Then make that someone who sounds "chaste and conservative" singing about sex. Then use phrases like "sleep with" to reduce the anger to a subtle level. All contradictory.
I removed all hihats
So by recording the worst track ....
The winner should have been the one at the *bottom* of the vote tally.
-
- KVRAF
- 1931 posts since 14 Aug, 2006 from Winnipeg
No matter the criteria, there will always be someone who feels their entry wasn't given proper due; it's the nature of the ego, especially the creative one. I've felt that way many times myself; being one of the "in" group (ie. chatty, frequent reviewer, multi-year participant) hasn't stopped some entries that I really like ending up on the bottom of the voting list.rp314 wrote:The only way to make this contest perfect would be for those in charge to implement an objective, completely fair method of judging the entries. It wouldn't improve one's chances any, mind you, but it would help to accept the inevitable outcome.![]()
My favourite, though, was a contestant from one or two years back who entered a song, declared in the gossip thread that it was totally awesome, shortly thereafter declared his complete disbelief that his entry wasn't being praised heavily enough, and shortly after that cursed us all as he vowed never to return. The whole thing took less than a week. Wish I could remember the particular contest; it'd be fun to re-read.
-
- KVRAF
- 4727 posts since 25 Mar, 2006 from The city by the bay
Well I was joking, and in fact I prefer an opportunity to get some personal reactions and therefore try to avoid too many explanations. But it's also probably not fair to characterize the criticisms some might have as being just disappointment over having lost.Echo Voodoo wrote:No matter the criteria, there will always be someone who feels their entry wasn't given proper due; it's the nature of the ego, especially the creative one. I've felt that way many times myself; being one of the "in" group (ie. chatty, frequent reviewer, multi-year participant) hasn't stopped some entries that I really like ending up on the bottom of the voting list.rp314 wrote:The only way to make this contest perfect would be for those in charge to implement an objective, completely fair method of judging the entries. It wouldn't improve one's chances any, mind you, but it would help to accept the inevitable outcome.![]()
However, it's precisely due to my own difficulty in trying to judge such a diverse bunch of music that I tend to agree with those who are skeptical that any changes would result in a fairer outcome. And, in the end, there is always that impossible to believe, infinitesimal chance that one's losing work is just not that great work of Art one thought it was.
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 21 Feb, 2004 from somewhere! anywhere!
i don't really mind what the 'conditions' of these contests are, i'm just happy to have an outlet to periodically document my processes, creative or otherwise. my pleasure is in the tension between the 'it takes all sorts/anything goes' approach and the need to acknowledge the theme/criteria in some way.
after all, where else can great works of art stand shoulder to shoulder with cries for help, together united in testament to humanity's inherent goodness?

after all, where else can great works of art stand shoulder to shoulder with cries for help, together united in testament to humanity's inherent goodness?
-
LauraMichelJarre LauraMichelJarre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=158959
- KVRist
- 437 posts since 1 Sep, 2007 from Oz
I think if the contest wasn't held, we wouldn't possibly be working as hard on material.knockman wrote:i don't really mind what the 'conditions' of these contests are, i'm just happy to have an outlet to periodically document my processes, creative or otherwise. my pleasure is in the tension between the 'it takes all sorts/anything goes' approach and the need to acknowledge the theme/criteria in some way.
after all, where else can great works of art stand shoulder to shoulder with cries for help, together united in testament to humanity's inherent goodness?
"The House of The Setting Sun" (August 2009) is one of my favorites. Sometimes the track takes a while to grow on you. Lasting quality isn't always recognized here, especially in the couple of days we are voting.
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
I wasn't criticizing anyone's track if that's the way my post came over, so please don't think that. I was just wondering if the theme was really that relevant to this month's contest as it didn't seem to be. 
