Yes I'm very serious. The iPod should've been Sony's product. Given the legacy of the walkman, it should have been reinvented as an mp3 player. They failed with the minidisc and gracefully bowed out.TristezaOrange wrote:To capitalize? On Walkmans? Are you serious? Because honestly I can't understand if you are or if this is a joke.jones-y wrote:Too bad they didn't have the wherewithal to capitalize... Too big and too slow. Now they're wannabes...TristezaOrange wrote:whyterabbyt wrote:Yeah, bet they wish they'd invented and popularised the portable audio playback device.djanthonyw wrote:Yea, Sony is pretty good when it comes to following in Apple's foot steps.![]()
Its almost laughably sad: There's a Sony Style right next to the Apple store in the Pentagon City Mall in No. VA. The contrast is stark. Apple Store: full of both employees and customers/browser. Sony Style: devoid of both, save the obligatory cash register drone.Walkmans defined decades, iPods have been around, since what? 2001? Let's give it 20 more years and see what happens. We'll talk then.
The world was ripe for it, with the napster filesharing phenomenon going on at the time.
Instead it went to another company with more vision. And that's the problem. Sony no longer has the vision. Too big and too slow. Look at their tablet announcement....
And I'm surprised if you really think the iPod is not considered to be a decade defining product right now. The decade is almost over (decade ends at the end of 2010, contrary to what they say on the news...) I'm hard pressed to think of another digital product that will be associated with the 2000's more than the ipod... The cultural impact, the visibility, the whole deal.... All very walkman-like, just way bigger. Shoulda been Sony.
As for my second point, I'll concede. I never said they didn't make a good product or have good sales in that market. I'm just saying its indicative of the way they are viewed as a company. Sony: Your dad's cool company...
