Your preferred method of copy protection? (poll)

Anything about MUSIC but doesn't fit into the forums above.

What method of copy protection do you prefer most?

Serial number / Keyfile
142
72%
User embed / Pre-registered software (Cytomic / Camel Audio)
24
12%
Challenge / Response (Internet authorization w/ a computer)
8
4%
Dongle (iLok, eLicenser, Ect...)
23
12%
 
Total votes: 197

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

There really should be an option for those that simply do not care... meaning they'll buy the plugins they want regardless of copy protection method or lack thereof.

Seriously, that alone was the point many were trying to make in a related thread... that they just don't care. :wink:

Post

A dongle, since I already have both iLok and Syncrosoft... But I wouldn't easily add a third, different dongle. I don't mind serials either, or keyfiles, although these things seem to get lost when migrating to new pc's (regardless of backups and NAS).
<put your signature here>

Post

Yay! We just don't have enough of this type of thread!

Post

To be perfectly honest I hate dongles and with 2 (or more) seeming to be required to get a lot of software working I am not surprised that people try to work around the need for it. I prefer to buy software with serials and dont mind challenge responses.
What I totally opose is why I have to buy a piece of inadequately built plastic that is less than durable to rely on software use at an over inflated price!
Dongles are great for machine to machine and on resintalls or new systems but I much prefer just to enter a serial.
Why software developers are passing on the costs of their perceived business loss to users, their customers is beyond me!
I buy software and dont mind the dongles but only one should only be necessary and developers/manufacturers of goods relying on them should provide free replacements and short term alternatives.
I know there's arguements of car keys etc but I see software as totally different as no one is going to steal my software. i dont have a lock on my PC.
I would be interested to see if the manufacturers and developers actually see a margin of difference with a dongle or without in their sales pre and post protection implementation and work arounds. After all I dont see Native Instruments going out of business or Ableton to name a few.
I believe companies should look within at their possible short comings and be realistic over non protected goods.
Would a majority of people who use unprotected software actually buy it? Probably not!
Nowadays there are so many quality freeware that you probably dont have to buy expensive software, another reason why software should be cheaper and not so heavily protected!
That's my steam let of!!
End of it is I do not buy any other software if it relies on dongles. I go without or wait for an alternative solution. Otherwise I buy the software :

Purchased in the last 12 months :

Native Instruments Komplete
Fabfilters
PSP Audio
Sonalksis
Vanguard

What I havent bought due to dongles but would like to own:

Rob Papens plugins
Soundtoys
Bluetubes
Auturia
to name a few

What I did buy or obtain as an alternative :

Access Virus
Prophet 08
Variety of Sound plugins

Post

Someone got some copy protection :hihi:

Post

Serial/keyfile would be my preference. :P

Post

I've changed my mind. I vote dongles. Then I'll store all my serial numbers on them. Doubly secure... :P

Post

Dongle fish.

Post

i hate being punished for actually buying the software i use.
(spent hours upon hours recently to install stuff on a new computer, still haven't got things working)

Serial number / Keyfile
:x

User embed / Pre-registered software (Cytomic / Camel Audio)
:help:
what's this? if not machine dependant: :love: :love: :love:

Challenge / Response (Internet authorization w/ a computer)
:x:x

Dongle (iLok, eLicenser, Ect...)
:x:x:x:x:x

i vote with my wallet: the only dongle i have is the Cubase one. it's nearly broken too (had to move twice recently).
i won't buy any dongle protected software ever again.

Post

Other: GPLv.3

Groet, Erik
Pop music delenda est.
Image

Post

cptgone wrote:it's nearly broken too (had to move twice recently).
I call BS. How could moving possibly have anything to do with breaking a dongle? Dongles have a thumbdrive formfactor: i.e. made to be carried around. Especially the Steinberg one is really sturdy... I've never broken, not even damaged or scratched a dongle or memory stick due to carrying it around.

:roll:

Post

cptgone wrote:User embed / Pre-registered software (Cytomic / Camel Audio)
:help:
what's this? if not machine dependant: :love: :love: :love:
Not machine specific.
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.

Post

When you are working with the laptop, dongle can be huge pain in the ass. You always try to be careful to not damage it...and sometimes forget.

Post

I've been impressed with how Camel Audio has handles Alchemy.

Post

elxicano wrote:There really should be an option for those that simply do not care... meaning they'll buy the plugins they want regardless of copy protection method or lack thereof.

Seriously, that alone was the point many were trying to make in a related thread... that they just don't care. :wink:
Exactly. I couldn't care less about which CP scheme is used.
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey

Post Reply

Return to “Everything Else (Music related)”