Jamstix 3!
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
Amazing work Ralph. Been a pleasure beta testing and now looking at the finished product. Magic. 
-
- KVRist
- 390 posts since 17 Jan, 2005
Thank you for your kind words!dvbssman wrote:I didn't bother to download or migrate the JS2 standard kits because I assumed the JS3 standard kits offer those sounds and more. Is that a correct assumption?
You can get by without the JS2 kits but they do complement the new kits and several kit mappings in JS3 use a combo of JS3 and JS2 sounds so I recommend installing both kits in JS3.
-
- KVRAF
- 16154 posts since 2 Dec, 2003 from Nashville, TN
Strangest thing, and it never used to happen. I decided to re-install JS2 to get ready for JS3, but now many of my drums are only coming out the left speaker. Some come out in the center or panned how they are supposed to be, but many kit pieces are only on the left side. This is in both JS2 and JS3.
Has this happened to anyone else?
Brent
Has this happened to anyone else?
Brent
My host is better than your host
-
- KVRist
- 390 posts since 17 Jan, 2005
koolkeys: Check 'Downmix' in the JS3 mixer and see if it fixes this. If so you must have an audio routing issue in the host. If this doesn't help, email me a saved JS3 song file with this issue and tell me one sound that is panned hard for you.
-
- Fearer of cheese
- 3216 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from UK
After buying every Jamstix release blind, this time I didn't and I'm glad that's the case. I've just tried the demo and "much improved GUI" Where? Unless I downloaded the wrong thing I can't see any improvement, the colours are awful and why is the text so small on a now bigger GUI? (small/poor colour choice enough to be all but unreadable for me) Ok, I could figure out what does what and remember it and I'll persevere with the demo, but as things stand I could easily pass on J3.
RIP Black Tom and Beckett. They weren't just cats, they were MY cats, the best cats ever.
-
- KVRAF
- 16154 posts since 2 Dec, 2003 from Nashville, TN
Thanks. Downmix was clicked, and I clicked it a couple of times and it didn't seem to work.Zauni wrote:koolkeys: Check 'Downmix' in the JS3 mixer and see if it fixes this. If so you must have an audio routing issue in the host. If this doesn't help, email me a saved JS3 song file with this issue and tell me one sound that is panned hard for you.
Then I tried to load a song preset that I had that used Metal and Jamcussion, and it asked me for my license keys for those(they were authorized with JS2 before, and everything else stayed authorized). After I did that, for some bizarre reason, everything has worked. What is strange is that the samples that wouldn't work right didn't seem to be from those. They were from the Bonzo pack and the JS3 stock kit.
Maybe it was just a glitch or something? Hard to say. I'll post back if I have further problems with it.
Brent
My host is better than your host
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 18505 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I mostly agree. Maybe I've been using Jamstix so long I'm used to it, but I felt that they had a really good chance to come up with a great UI and they mostly blew it. Also I notice I hear clicks in Live 8 when the UI is up.Ian B wrote:After buying every Jamstix release blind, this time I didn't and I'm glad that's the case. I've just tried the demo and "much improved GUI" Where? Unless I downloaded the wrong thing I can't see any improvement, the colours are awful and why is the text so small on a now bigger GUI? (small/poor colour choice enough to be all but unreadable for me) Ok, I could figure out what does what and remember it and I'll persevere with the demo, but as things stand I could easily pass on J3.
UI isn't about a nice skin and putting everything on the screen. Lots of thought as to how people use software (and it's hardware ancestors) needs to be considered. What features should always be visible? What should be buried a layer? Many devs I've worked with seem very focused on emulating some fake hardware look and zero time considering ergonomics.
I love what Jamstix does and I'll continue to use it, but man does it need another pass on the UI front. I'd also love if they allowed you to perform a beat via midi into an empty loop (click track for tempo) and let you use that as the seed for the jam. That would rock my world.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
I hate to criticize Jamstix, but I do agree that the GUI is certainly one of the things that is need of most improvement. Personally I think it has improved since version 2, but it's certainly lagging behind other software in that respect.
Other than that I have no complaints at all and think it's a great product.
Other than that I have no complaints at all and think it's a great product.
-
- KVRian
- 763 posts since 27 Sep, 2009 from Bristol UK
Whining about the GUI
Jamstix is pretty much unique in what it does much to the delight of me and many happy users
The GUI isnt that bad is it really ?? give Ralph a break! What do you do stare at the GUI instead of making beats?
Damn ive started arguing about software, time to leave KVR maybe ?
Great job Ralph ignore the whiners
Jamstix is pretty much unique in what it does much to the delight of me and many happy users
The GUI isnt that bad is it really ?? give Ralph a break! What do you do stare at the GUI instead of making beats?
Damn ive started arguing about software, time to leave KVR maybe ?
Great job Ralph ignore the whiners
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
So it should never be improved? Why would the GUI be unimportant? If it's so unimportant why does it get mentioned so often?leggie wrote:The GUI isnt that bad is it really ?? give Ralph a break! What do you do stare at the GUI instead of making beats?
-
- KVRian
- 763 posts since 27 Sep, 2009 from Bristol UK
Yes its important but not as important as the brain or the sound sets !!robojam wrote:So it should never be improved? Why would the GUI be unimportant? If it's so unimportant why does it get mentioned so often?leggie wrote:The GUI isnt that bad is it really ?? give Ralph a break! What do you do stare at the GUI instead of making beats?
Why it gets mentioned so much is because of those who stare at GUIs and not making music.
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
Really? You know exactly how much music each person who would like to see an improved GUI makes?leggie wrote:Why it gets mentioned so much is because of those who stare at GUIs and not making music.
Please enlighten us all on how much music we've made recently.
-
- KVRist
- 390 posts since 17 Jan, 2005
You can do that as follows:zerocrossing wrote:I'd also love if they allowed you to perform a beat via midi into an empty loop (click track for tempo) and let you use that as the seed for the jam. That would rock my world.
- check LEARN in the bar editor
- loop a bar on an empty part
- play drums via MIDI as needed and they should be entered in the bar editor
- stop loop and adjust notes if need be
- click 'Turn Groove Into A Style' in the bar editor menu
- part is ready to compose
You can also use this to enter just a basic kick snare pattern and after you turned it into a groove, use 'Extract From Style' in the brain menu to add hihats etc. from another groove to get a combo of JS style and your basic groove.
-
- KVRian
- 763 posts since 27 Sep, 2009 from Bristol UK
Whateverrobojam wrote:Really? You know exactly how much music each person who would like to see an improved GUI makes?leggie wrote:Why it gets mentioned so much is because of those who stare at GUIs and not making music.
Please enlighten us all on how much music we've made recently.
Jamstix is a Technological marvel
Last edited by leggie on Thu May 06, 2010 8:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
