KVR Audio

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Mon May 17, 2010 10:01 am

ronaldpassion wrote:Aloysius
-> so the problem in IR loader?

I can only assume so. The sound is different to just having the Cab switch turned off. It seems to be defaulting to a particular Cab sound that I could not find directly in Preset drop down list.

ronaldpassion · Post by **ronaldpassion** » Mon May 17, 2010 10:11 am

Hmm, i am gonna check it!
Hope find way out.
Very big thanx

TQ,RP!

samicide · Post by **samicide** » Mon May 17, 2010 5:28 pm

mrblitz000 wrote:and a big thanks again to Ronald Passion!

yes no doubt!

and to Ronald, if you want to add my sound clip to the Revz page I'll send you a higher quality mp3 if you want. The guitars are 100% RevolotuionZ with no external eq or compression except a quick lot cut from the onboard cubase eq

(the solo has a few extra cuts in the high mids and a hint of cubase delay/verb, same with the intro, but there's no reverb at all or anything else on the rhythms)

ronaldpassion · Post by **ronaldpassion** » Mon May 17, 2010 5:43 pm

Wokeee, why not?

Big Thanx friend

TQ,RP!

ronaldpassion · Post by **ronaldpassion** » Tue May 18, 2010 5:56 am

Guyz!

Basically, what do you need when having guitar record???

For ex (me):
- Amp Sims has 2 channels at least, Clean and Drive
- Cab sim, 2 channel would be great
- Tuner would be +1.

The rest reverb or other FX will put later in mixing process.

Very please give input!

TQ,RP!

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Tue May 18, 2010 6:04 am

How about a built in Stereoizer? Mono compatible like STThick (link below).

Basic concept:

1. Make two additional copies of the track
2. Delay the copies slightly
3. Pan one of the copies full left and the other full right
4. Make one of the copies out-of-phase so that the effect doesn't sound strange in mono.

Stereoizers with modulation on one side are a BAD idea IMHO. They sound strange if you can only hear the left or right loud-speaker etc.

When I use STThick, I always have to balance the sides again. Some technical problem. Maybe you could make the output balanced.

http://www.stormrecordingstudio.co.uk/VST.htm

ronaldpassion · Post by **ronaldpassion** » Tue May 18, 2010 1:59 pm

is it something like stereo widening?
For Guitar Amp right?

Apologize my english

TQ,RP!

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Tue May 18, 2010 2:47 pm

Yes! Stereo widening (converting Mono to 'stereo'). The concept (idea) is quite simple. I think if you download that Plugin (STThick) you will understand it in minutes. Simple and effective.

Just an idea for you to think about.

kaffeekranz · Post by **kaffeekranz** » Tue May 18, 2010 3:34 pm

To be honest, I'd like it to stay simple

There are enough plugins out there I could use for stereo widening.. and why not just record the same phrase twice?
Or is there any creative artistic background to it?

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Tue May 18, 2010 4:38 pm

kaffeekranz wrote:To be honest, I'd like it to stay simple
There are enough plugins out there I could use for stereo widening.. and why not just record the same phrase twice?
Or is there any creative artistic background to it?

Why Oh Why Do Kids Ask Why?

enroe · Post by **enroe** » Tue May 18, 2010 8:46 pm

kaffeekranz wrote:To be honest, I'd like it to stay simple ...

+ 1

A guitar amp should be good at:

1. Sound
2. Sound
3. Sound

4. Lowest possible CPU-load
5. Good handling (GUI, knobs etc. )

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Tue May 18, 2010 8:53 pm

enroe wrote:
kaffeekranz wrote:To be honest, I'd like it to stay simple ...
+ 1

A guitar amp should be good at:

1. Sound
2. Sound
3. Sound

4. Lowest possible CPU-load
5. Good handling (GUI, knobs etc. )

Why?

enroe · Post by **enroe** » Tue May 18, 2010 9:08 pm

Aloysius wrote: Why?

You know the answer:

There's a manifold of plugins here which give you all kinds of additional effects like phaser, chorus, compressors, stereoizers etc. etc.. You can use these all as inserts before or after your ampsim.

IMO it is a better strategy to let every single plugin be an expert-plugin in its core-use. That means: An amp sim should be good at "amplifier simulation".

I don't like "all in one plugins". Better a simple one purpose plugin, which does its job in an awesome way.

kaffeekranz · Post by **kaffeekranz** » Tue May 18, 2010 9:21 pm

enroe wrote:
Aloysius wrote: I don't like "all in one plugins". Better a simple one purpose plugin, which does its job in an awesome way.

Reminds me a bit of Amplitube 3. I really, really, really like the sound of some of the amps, but the whole package is just way too much.
It's sluggish, it's fat and I don't really think that the effects are any better than those you can find, like, around here (mokafix.. arrr).
With maybe just 2, or 3 amps and a fully working cpu and memory friendly engine/carriage (:>) I would have bought it. But like this. Just no.

samicide · Post by **samicide** » Wed May 19, 2010 1:47 am

ronaldpassion wrote:Guyz!

Basically, what do you need when having guitar record???

For ex (me):
- Amp Sims has 2 channels at least, Clean and Drive
- Cab sim, 2 channel would be great
- Tuner would be +1.

The rest reverb or other FX will put later in mixing process.

Very please give input!

TQ,RP!

Ageed, it's a lot easier to find a decent flanger effect then it is to find a good high gain sound.

a simple accurate tuner would be sweet.

RevolutionZ Guitar Head Amp