Tonehammer announces Requiem - Cinematic Choir (Update: New Technical Demo)
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 190 posts since 2 Nov, 2008
A very simple technical demo of Requiem using two tracks.
The first track is a regular sustain morph patch containing MW control over morph between oh to ah. The second track is our fabulous bass singer also featured in the library. Note how smooth the swell is between the oh to ah - using a very deep and sophisticated script that allows for more realistic MW controlled swells/blends and generally better feel/playability on the keys.
http://www.tonehammer.com/demos/toneham ... _oh_ah.mp3
The first track is a regular sustain morph patch containing MW control over morph between oh to ah. The second track is our fabulous bass singer also featured in the library. Note how smooth the swell is between the oh to ah - using a very deep and sophisticated script that allows for more realistic MW controlled swells/blends and generally better feel/playability on the keys.
http://www.tonehammer.com/demos/toneham ... _oh_ah.mp3
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 190 posts since 2 Nov, 2008
This demo shows the soprano, tenor and bass singer in the Requiem Choir library - what is special about the demo is that each singer sings two words, but the third word is a real-time (CC controlled) morph between the two previous words.
The female soprano sings: "Spi-Ri-Tum", "Cru-Ci-Fix-Us", Morph "Cru-Ci-Tum".
The male tenor sings: "In-Car-Na-Tus", "Re-Su-Rec-Te", Morph: "Re-Su-Na-Tus".
The male bass sings "O-Ri-Gin", "A-Do-Ra-Mus", Morph: "A-Do-Gin".
It was all done in realtime with one patch pr. singer using X/Y morph control between the two words on CC, very simple.
Check here:
http://www.tonehammer.com/demos/toneham ... _moprh.mp3
The female soprano sings: "Spi-Ri-Tum", "Cru-Ci-Fix-Us", Morph "Cru-Ci-Tum".
The male tenor sings: "In-Car-Na-Tus", "Re-Su-Rec-Te", Morph: "Re-Su-Na-Tus".
The male bass sings "O-Ri-Gin", "A-Do-Ra-Mus", Morph: "A-Do-Gin".
It was all done in realtime with one patch pr. singer using X/Y morph control between the two words on CC, very simple.
Check here:
http://www.tonehammer.com/demos/toneham ... _moprh.mp3
- KVRist
- 143 posts since 24 Sep, 2003 from Ireland
Sounds great.
If the watermarking really is transparent (i.e. nulls with a non-watermarked phase inverted version), then this is a nice idea. I guess it will dissuade the heavy hitters (the target demographic) from pirating the software, for fear of having their blockbuster soundtrack outed as a warez creation.The water marking is completely transparent and no user will notice it, but it is there and every customer will receive custom versions of the library, but fear not - you won't notice it.
Meh
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 190 posts since 2 Nov, 2008
We have made our own method, which is embedded both into patch and source files - and I can assure you that it is virtually undetectable.
-
Reverend Rhythm Reverend Rhythm https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6041
- KVRAF
- 2859 posts since 21 Feb, 2003 from Woodstock, GA USA
To the Tonehammer Titans:
These demos are amazing! Every demo impresses me more than the last! Great work!
I am uncomfortable with almost all copy protection. I especially dislike dongles... to the point where I avoid products with them. At least I avoid them if at all possible. The Kontakt player model is not my favorite, but I can go along with it.
But I have no problem with Watermarking. None at all. I don't mind that my copy of Alchemy identifies me as the owner, and I don't mind if any sample collections I own have my name imprinted on them. I tend toward being private, but I don't, in any way, feel this intrudes on my privacy. So a big thumbs up to you guys!
Good job!
These demos are amazing! Every demo impresses me more than the last! Great work!
I am uncomfortable with almost all copy protection. I especially dislike dongles... to the point where I avoid products with them. At least I avoid them if at all possible. The Kontakt player model is not my favorite, but I can go along with it.
But I have no problem with Watermarking. None at all. I don't mind that my copy of Alchemy identifies me as the owner, and I don't mind if any sample collections I own have my name imprinted on them. I tend toward being private, but I don't, in any way, feel this intrudes on my privacy. So a big thumbs up to you guys!
- KVRAF
- 2177 posts since 12 Nov, 2009
anybody here bought requiem yet?
Finally!
