
and this gold top is my all fav:

got to be ready to shell out 4k$ though


It duly arrived and was a big improvement, tho' I'm still not 100% happy with the slightly uneven output when amplified/plugged in.Ian B wrote:It turned out the transducer was faulty on my Skylark Classical, that has been replaced along with having the saddle lowered and nut slots filed to give a better action. It seems odd that the faulty pickup wasn't spotted prior to dispatch, but there you go, it's scheduled for delivery tomorrow morning and this time, I hope it plays and sounds as good as it looks.Ian B wrote:It arrived earlier, and while it looks fantastic (tho' very heavyIan B wrote:My next (and last for a long time) is arriving sometime tomorrow morning![]()
A Skylark acoustic roundback electro-classical http://www.skylarkguitars.com/skylark-r ... 194-0.html I'd had my heart set on the non electric version for a while as Ithe idea of a all wood roundback, but the £69 difference between that and the electric persuaded me to go for the latter as it seems pups for nylon strung guitars can be a tad expensive. £311 inc hard case and delivery seems a good buy imo, tho' time will tell.
) there are issues that are almost certainly going to make me return it as not suitable.
First up, tho' this could be my not being used to nylon strung guitars, the G, B and E seem very dull and the action is far higher than I'm used to, not that I expected it to be flush to the fretboard. The biggest problem is the pup, no matter how I tried I couldn't get a balanced output across all 6 strings, the top E is noticably quieter and isn't improved much by taking off all the bottom end/middle via the inbuilt EQ.
'EDIT'
I mailed Steve at Skylark with my concerns and within minutes he'd phoned to talk about them. The upshot is, he's arranging for it to be picked up tomorrow to take it back and get their in house tech to set it up to my specs, in as far as they can with the action, new high tension strings should help. Seemingly they replace the plastic saddle with a bone one on these guitars and the variation in volume could be down to that not sitting corerctly on the piezo. All in all, this is excellent customer service imo.
y'know, I think that works better. He's gone for a slightly less extreme offset shape which I suits the scratchplate shape better. Same with the 'strat;.monsterbeetle wrote:Don grosh actually has an electrajet that pretty much fits the telemaster description:
Me too. Although I think I'd probably get a resonator to experiment with open tunings a lot more and do a bit more slide playing.Laguna Rising wrote:Well, I'd like to have another instrument to have the freedom of experimenting with open tunings and never have to be in a hurry to switch back to standard...![]()
Cheers

I think Gibson branding probably loses you more money on resale - you pay more in the first place and a recent Gibson doesn't get a high resale value like an older one. Might actually be better off with an Epiphone for resale value (less to lose).nix808 wrote:The only drawback I guess is resale as it's not Gibson branded.
That's something I'd leave to an experienced luthier considering you'd have to rout the body for this one.rectus_dominus wrote:Fine then, I'm happy with my new long-term goal
And what do you think, how much mess is adding a 3rd pickup between the two humbuckers?
drawback?nix808 wrote:I think it would be nice.
The only drawback I guess is resale as it's not Gibson branded.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026