List of Unique VST Synths
-
- KVRAF
- 2831 posts since 11 Jun, 2003
Fabfilter Twin 2 because it relies so heavily on it's (excellent) Filter and delay sections to shape the sounds.
Symptohm Melohman
Symptohm Melohman
Last edited by pheeleep on Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Play it by ear
-
- KVRist
- 420 posts since 29 May, 2005 from Central Ohio, USA
I'm not buying into any of these, except for zerocrossing's mention of Audio Damage's Axon.
Fig Newton: The force required to accelerate a fig 39.37 inches per sec.
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
I should know that..duh.. I bought the damn thing...TotcProductions wrote:Harmless isn't an FM emulation. It's an additive synth.tomg wrote:Not top.. Unique.phreaque wrote:Top VSTi's are:
Sylenth1
Synth1
ASynth
FM7
ACE (UHE)
Korg Legacy Edition (digital & analog)
IL Harmless
Sylenth1 - Superwave, JP8000 Hardware emulation
Synth1 - Nord Lead Hardware emulation
ASynth - 2 oscillators with MS20/MiniMoog/and Curtis Filters Hardware emulation
FM7 - DX7 FM Hardware emulation
ACE (UHE) - Modular synth.. Hardware emulation
Korg Legacy Edition (digital & analog) Hardware emulation.
IL Harmless FM Hardware emulation
Actually a very nice piece.
- Let It Whip -
My Site, Music and Free EFM Plugins
My Site, Music and Free EFM Plugins
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5156 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
-
- KVRian
- 583 posts since 4 Sep, 2007
they might be unique in their sound and the character. but not unique as a synth.justin3am wrote:Can a unique implementation of a tried and true synthesis method result in a unique synth? I think so but it seems that some disagree. Why is that?
Like Minimonsta and Symptohm... they use synthesis methods that aren't unique but I have always though of them as very innovative and unique because of their modulation sections, melohman morphing and (in the case of symptohm) the filter section.
two different things imo.
Stomper.
- KVRian
- 1448 posts since 17 Jul, 2007 from Riversland Valhalla
Indeed mate... I'd add Arturia Moog Modular but I don't own it. I once installed the demo, it was very ground breaking synth. But hard to program.tomg wrote:
Not top.. Unique.
Sylenth1 - Superwave, JP8000 Hardware emulation
Synth1 - Nord Lead Hardware emulation
ASynth - 2 oscillators with MS20/MiniMoog/and Curtis Filters Hardware emulation
FM7 - DX7 FM Hardware emulation
ACE (UHE) - Modular synth.. Hardware emulation
Korg Legacy Edition (digital & analog) Hardware emulation.
IL Harmless FM Hardware emulation
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
I don't quite get this topic... if by "unique" you mean "you can't get this sound from anywhere else", then really none of the ones mentioned qualify. In terms of workflow/UI/"character", there are a few that come to mind, like Synplant and Axon. But even then, I don't see the point.
Maybe if people would post their reasons, instead of just compiling those tried and true lists we all love so much... that would be interesting.
Okay: Synplant, because where else can you tug at cute little branches to create sounds?
Axon: programming it to some depth never yields the results you intended, which usually makes for pleasant surprises.
Maybe if people would post their reasons, instead of just compiling those tried and true lists we all love so much... that would be interesting.
Okay: Synplant, because where else can you tug at cute little branches to create sounds?
Axon: programming it to some depth never yields the results you intended, which usually makes for pleasant surprises.
-
- KVRAF
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
-
- KVRAF
- 2628 posts since 30 Mar, 2007 from In and Out Burger
+1tomg wrote:You are getting very defensive lately.Urs wrote:And to be honest, ACE doesn't belong on the list because it doesn't have Supersaw, right?Architeuthis wrote:I wouldn't mention Reaktor, ACE, KarmaFX, or any modular synth. They have a very traditional interface and traditional way of thinking. That's why they don't belong on this list.
Edit: Of course you can make a Reaktor ensemble that is unique... whatever!
[Insert Signature Here]
-
- KVRAF
- 16744 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
- Beware the Quoth
- 35449 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Which 'traditional' way of thinking? The one where you want the best harmonics in your sines, or the one where analog synths with integrated circuits are secretly digital?Architeuthis wrote:I wouldn't mention Reaktor, ACE, KarmaFX, or any modular synth. They have a very traditional interface and traditional way of thinking. That's why they don't belong on this list.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- u-he
- 30209 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
whyterabbyt wrote:Which 'traditional' way of thinking? The one where you want the best harmonics in your sines, or the one where analog synths with integrated circuits are secretly digital?
- Beware the Quoth
- 35449 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
No, the OP is just known for a set of asinine combination of demands and assumptions that bely any rationale.tomg wrote:You are getting very defensive lately.
Indeed, that's not why its unique. But I think it might be unique because its currently the only modular that allows audio signals to be properly patched as anywhere in its signal path. Isnt it?Ace is not unique because it's a modular synth.
Does it actually do that? I think not.IMO KarmaFX did it better
...And that definitely doesn't do it...not to mention Arturia's moog modular that's based on hardware from the 1960's.
Seems more like you're going solely by the existence of 'virtual' cables or something rather than any attempt to discern genuinely unique features. Pretty much all of the non-emulative modulars (eg Arturia, 2600, XILS3) seem to have unique features of one kind or another.
The OP (in his typical closedminded fashion) rules out 'any modular synth' and yet Tassman has been unique for years in doing modular physical modelling, for example. Reaktor is unique in that it allows structures right down to the DSP level and all the way up to composite ensembles of instruments and effects...
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 5666 posts since 23 Mar, 2006 from pendeLondonmonium
But it really isn't unique in that respect. Honestly. Its various modules are more limited than String Studio. Look at the Exciter module in Sakura and String Studio, as one example. A huge difference, with String Studio being more complex. And something like String Studio's Termination module does not exist in Sakura at all.TotcProductions wrote:I don't know, I think Sakura's unique in the amount of control it gives to the user.dhalfen wrote:Sakura sure looks prettier, but it's merely the emperor wearing a pink-chiffon gown.himalaya wrote:I was just about to mention Krishna, but Frank has beat me to it. However, Sakura is not unique at all ( String Studio VS1, hint, hint).
Note: Obviously the number of parameters should never be the judging factor in how the instruments sounds. But that's another story.
-
Jonathan Shepherd Jonathan Shepherd https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=5644
- KVRian
- 748 posts since 28 Jan, 2003
amen.re_mute wrote:Scanned Synth by Humanoid Sound Systems
