so an impulse response is appropriate for deriving the function of any linear system, yet people are taking IRs of all kinds of nonlinear, dynamics oriented hardware. is this ~"best we can do"/"because we can" ideology?
IDLE question: impulses and non-linearity
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
..the answer may not be for several more chapters
so an impulse response is appropriate for deriving the function of any linear system, yet people are taking IRs of all kinds of nonlinear, dynamics oriented hardware. is this ~"best we can do"/"because we can" ideology?
so an impulse response is appropriate for deriving the function of any linear system, yet people are taking IRs of all kinds of nonlinear, dynamics oriented hardware. is this ~"best we can do"/"because we can" ideology?
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
if you go on the (unproven) basis that 'they' (whoever they might be) are only ever taking one IR per device, i guess they'd be deriving 'a' function then, rather than 'the' function.xoxos wrote:..the answer may not be for several more chapters
so an impulse response is appropriate for deriving the function of any linear system, yet people are taking IRs of all kinds of nonlinear, dynamics oriented hardware. is this ~"best we can do"/"because we can" ideology?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
you wouldn't care to rephrase that without an apparent assumption that i hadn't considered any possibilities beforehand, o one for whom the lights shut off, which wouldn't be because someone with a telephone was watching you come down the road, or is diminuation an inherent part of your charm/the package?
:/
:/
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
what are you blathering on about?xoxos wrote:you wouldn't care to rephrase that without an apparent assumption that i hadn't considered any possibilities beforehand, o one for whom the lights shut off, which wouldn't be because someone with a telephone was watching you come down the road, or is diminuation an inherent part of your charm/the package?
:/
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
AdmiralQuality AdmiralQuality https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=83902
- Banned
- 6657 posts since 10 Oct, 2005 from Toronto, Canada
whyterabbyt's answer was entirely reasonable. If you were to take many IRs with different impulse levels, then you should be able to characterize non-linearities as well, right? Make a 3D dataset instead of the just a single 2D one.
-
- KVRist
- 205 posts since 12 Feb, 2009 from Perú
Isn't that what Focusrite's LiquidMix does? At least that's what I recall reading.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
it's the conversation over a duration of exchanges: maybe his tone plays for scholastic camaraderie to you, to me it's unnecessary and insulting to suggest that the unknowns and generalisations needed to be clarified as such, as if i would never have realised without him. shrug.AdmiralQuality wrote:whyterabbyt's answer was entirely reasonable.
i stopped reading his posts earlier this year because his tone towards me is sedulously denigrating, but he still replies in my threads frequently.
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
In other words 'he didnt actually say anything against me, but in order to get back at him for somethihng previous Im going to infer it into the post, then make some random weirdness about people with phones'xoxos wrote:it's the conversation over a duration of exchanges: maybe his tone plays for scholastic camaraderie to you, to me it's unnecessary and insulting to suggest that the unknowns and generalisations needed to be clarified as such, as if i would never have realised without him.
On the other hand, Rurik, here are the facts: you're not going to be the only person that ever turns up in this thread, and Im not about to fail to make it explicitly clear what Im saying. Especially when there are those who might assume that any unknowns and generalisations I leave in my reply are an opening for them to criticise it.
Its not all about you, xoxos. Try and get used to that.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."