Well, then it's settled! Amp sims simply need to add knobs for "air" and "punch" so we can dial in the REAL thingtrmupstage wrote:...still, it has no air or punch.
The real amp simply sits right in a mix without any fiddling with EQ. It has clarity, air, punch that no sim ever give me.
I think I finally hate amp sims!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1392 posts since 28 May, 2008 from Saint Paul, MN
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
are you saying it blows?hibidy wrote:GR4 has "air"
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRist
- 97 posts since 8 May, 2004
The difference between sim and 'real' amps might be noticable , but tbh i believe that the average music consumer will never be able to tell the difference.
Only pro's will maybe be able to.
It depends on what soundcard and monitors you use also. Also for recording 'real amps'into the hard drive.
The amp sims are convincing enough to record complete metal or jazz albums.
At least, that is what i believe.
Same thing here as for virtual synths and analog synths.
But the sheer luxury to be able to load up a stack of amps and fx with the press of a key , in stead of re-arranging all your cables /amsps/fx to get another sound ( let alone owning/buying all of the simulated amps/fx), am i the only one here to find this an amazing thing?
I did not even mention all the creative combinations of amps and fx you can try out with the click of a button, clearly something like that is an incredible thing to be able to do. Try the same thing with hardware, although a fun thing to do, you will need to own all those components and you will lose a lot of time reconfiguring everything....
Some ppl here do not even seem to find this in any way interesting, because they think the sims are not real sounding enough. I find this remarkable...I think it's understandable that ppl are unwilling to accept these sims as a substitution for a real amp, But that is no reason to not even mention all the advantages these amp sims bring you. So therefore i just did..
Just my 2 cents...
Only pro's will maybe be able to.
It depends on what soundcard and monitors you use also. Also for recording 'real amps'into the hard drive.
The amp sims are convincing enough to record complete metal or jazz albums.
At least, that is what i believe.
Same thing here as for virtual synths and analog synths.
But the sheer luxury to be able to load up a stack of amps and fx with the press of a key , in stead of re-arranging all your cables /amsps/fx to get another sound ( let alone owning/buying all of the simulated amps/fx), am i the only one here to find this an amazing thing?
I did not even mention all the creative combinations of amps and fx you can try out with the click of a button, clearly something like that is an incredible thing to be able to do. Try the same thing with hardware, although a fun thing to do, you will need to own all those components and you will lose a lot of time reconfiguring everything....
Some ppl here do not even seem to find this in any way interesting, because they think the sims are not real sounding enough. I find this remarkable...I think it's understandable that ppl are unwilling to accept these sims as a substitution for a real amp, But that is no reason to not even mention all the advantages these amp sims bring you. So therefore i just did..
Just my 2 cents...
-
- KVRist
- 387 posts since 30 Mar, 2006 from North Florida
Man-T said it all for me too - I'm 59 years old - played for 44 years - I own tube amps and SS amps but all this modeling is amazing to me - haven't turned on a real amp in a long time as I have so much fun on my computer now.
Now the proud owner of an avid 11 Rack, Running Pro Tools 10.3.3 - for me it's heaven!
- KVRAF
- 18446 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I'm not. I totally agree. I never liked it much either. I'd say I like it less than even most freeware amp sims.trmupstage wrote:Next, Vintage Amp Room beats out Revalver for standard Marshall, Vox and Twin sounds. I was kind of surprised by how little I liked Revalver.
That's exactly what Amplitube is trying to be. You could probably get around this by bypassing the cab/mic section and using an impulse instead, but since you already like VAR why bother? I've always thought that VAR and MAR were on par with Amplitube. Maybe a bit better in some respects, but at the price you'd think they'd include some stomps and post cab effects. Maybe I'm lazy, but most of the time I really don't want to bother with launching and tweaking more than one plug in to get a guitar sound. That's just me though. I could see using some dedicated stomp vsts and post cab effects with the Softube if I was really polishing a track for commercial release, but for me it's playing for my cat and posting an mp3 every now and then.trmupstage wrote: Amplitube just didn't do it for me. It doesn't sound like I'm in front of an amp in a room. Yes, I turned off all the effects, but still, it was not much different than playing my POD XT. I'm not saying it sounds like a POD. All I'm saying is that, like most sims, it sounds like a recording of an amp, not like your in front of one.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
Dean Aka Nekro Dean Aka Nekro https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=162100
- KVRAF
- 6178 posts since 4 Oct, 2007 from Escaped At Last
Well i still always go for the real deal as mentioned EQ wise if i have 3 or 4 mics on a speaker cab then by adjusting the level once i have each mic in the (totally subjective and whatnot bigtime) sweet spot then i have all the EQ i need usually via the relative levels of each fader. The 'Control room' thing in GR4 attempts to emulate this but does not nail it for me although it is a step in the right direction for sure
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
what confuses me is that you say you don't want to bother launching and tweaking more than one pluggin, but you swear by AT3 which is indeed a pluggin that has a whole lot of smaller pluggins inside of it. AT3 and GR4 are both very bloated (not a bad thing) and takes a lot of think unless you just use presets. That is precisely what this thread is about, it was a tongue and cheek point about being tired of having to go through so many steps and choices to get one's sounds and that describes AT3 to a 'T'..no?zerocrossing wrote: Maybe I'm lazy, but most of the time I really don't want to bother with launching and tweaking more than one plug in to get a guitar sound. That's just me though.
Now again there is nothing wrong with that because as strangedogs says sims allow you all the pleasure one could ask for with limitless possibilities. But you have to admit, in most sims it's very easy to get lost in that and emerge with nothing but a lot of knowledge gained and some presets made. (again, far from a bad thing)
I am exactly the same way as you, I get it 1000% because when I am in the creative frame of mind I do not want too much think or it's like a bucket of ice water dumped on me. But as I see it there is already a delicate balance between 'creative' and 'critical' thinking, but the goal is 'productive' thinking. When using something as technical as a computer to be creative one really blurs the line even more. The key is to maximize your efficiency between 'creative' and 'critical' thinking so that you can be lazy (as I am as well) or be productive. Productive of course being a very relative term in this case, if you sit down and jam for a couple of hours in pure bliss with no buckets of ice water dumped on you...that is imho very productive. However there are many who need to spit out as many songs as they can to feel productive and that is of course just as valid because that is relative to their goals.
In other words in order to get the most of my creative time I have to maximize my think time and possess the wisdom to know when is the best time to be critical or creative. Would you agree with that? (not that it matters if you don't)
I really will never understand why people are so polarized on this subject
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
Now I would be worried about how much noise 3 or 4 mics would introduce...but that's just me still getting use to not living 15 feet from the busiest street in the area. Still, two mics maybe but 3 or 4 is too much for me..OTOH I don't mind having a set up that records at the minimum 5 sources at once for one guitar part and ultimately could lead to countless tracks with re-ampingNEKRO.MACHINE wrote:Well i still always go for the real deal as mentioned EQ wise if i have 3 or 4 mics on a speaker cab then by adjusting the level once i have each mic in the (totally subjective and whatnot bigtime) sweet spot then i have all the EQ i need usually via the relative levels of each fader. The 'Control room' thing in GR4 attempts to emulate this but does not nail it for me although it is a step in the right direction for sure
BTW I really am not a fan of the control room in GR4, I know when it first came out people were head over heals about it, but too me it's overkill.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 4071 posts since 4 Mar, 2008 from Near Pittsburgh
I usually do two mics, maybe one in the back if it is a combo. I put tape on the grill and usually can place them pretty quickly based on that with good results. That's just a combination of getting older and not knowing the equipment because I don't change it that much, and an unfortunate amount of $$ and a fortunate amount of time spent at school obsessing over such things. However, I'm more interested in the direct out that I have going as I get a good clean signal for reamping like you mention, Hink. BIG fan of having that available.
...especially for amp sims, and since I'm a bit partial (naturally, based on my employer - but we're also a bunch of surprisingly gear-headed people too) to a certain one and how it can get me out of a jam or be blended in together, and many times I can just use it for the end product anyway.
...especially for amp sims, and since I'm a bit partial (naturally, based on my employer - but we're also a bunch of surprisingly gear-headed people too) to a certain one and how it can get me out of a jam or be blended in together, and many times I can just use it for the end product anyway.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
we have the same weber which is cool, I'm surprised how good the line out is. As far as mic'ing my biggest issue is still being anal about disturbing neighbors, though I would love to run the amp loud enough so I could put a condenser a few feet away I feel as if to overcome ambient noise I would have to crank it too much. Now my only neighbor that would hear it says no problem, he never hears anything but there's this voice in my head that tells me to be respectful anyhow...which means if I want to be comfortable playing I can't be worried about neighbors.buscemi wrote:I usually do two mics, maybe one in the back if it is a combo. I put tape on the grill and usually can place them pretty quickly based on that with good results. That's just a combination of getting older and not knowing the equipment because I don't change it that much, and an unfortunate amount of $$ and a fortunate amount of time spent at school obsessing over such things. However, I'm more interested in the direct out that I have going as I get a good clean signal for reamping like you mention, Hink. BIG fan of having that available.
...especially for amp sims, and since I'm a bit partial (naturally, based on my employer - but we're also a bunch of surprisingly gear-headed people too) to a certain one and how it can get me out of a jam or be blended in together, and many times I can just use it for the end product anyway.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
Dean Aka Nekro Dean Aka Nekro https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=162100
- KVRAF
- 6178 posts since 4 Oct, 2007 from Escaped At Last
Hink i am talking about a 4x12 with mis-matched speakers inside (deliberately), with an MD421, a Sontronics Sigma, a Sontronics Delta and C414 or similar LDC in cardiod mode and if in a decent room a U whatever is in the mic cupboard by Neumann further back so at my place/home studio it is not that many. Usually an MD421, e609 maybe one of the sontronics Ribbons or AudioTechnica AE2500 (dual-element capsule which is really dope on bass cabs also and really suited for kick drum mainly). I can usually crank up either my Marshall DSL50, Ampeg BR-1e, Blackstar HT-5 or Vox AD100VT Valvetronix heads through a choice of 3 cabs but usually the afforementioned 4x12" at my home space and deal with what little background noise issues there are (like Kids running in and ruining the perfect take...etc.
). Luckily my place is a detached house but the internal noise is more of an issue than pissing any neighbour off! I also do use some plug-in solutions and it depends on what i need but i can get my phsyical rig and mic's setup quicker than mousing around the way i have my gear layed out/the width of my space sort of dictates that already. If the actual speakers in the cabinet were not deliberately mis-matched then i would probably use just two (3 tops) on it 
I have made some Impulses of my setup but still, even then it feels like a second-best, not by as much as it used to though these days i must add
Hope that clears up what i mean and i am not the sort to add unecessary extras like more microphones as i keep things as simple as i can. Just that sometimes written down apprears to be/sounds more complex than it actually is if one were with me in the room it would explain alot better
Cheers
Dean
I have made some Impulses of my setup but still, even then it feels like a second-best, not by as much as it used to though these days i must add
Hope that clears up what i mean and i am not the sort to add unecessary extras like more microphones as i keep things as simple as i can. Just that sometimes written down apprears to be/sounds more complex than it actually is if one were with me in the room it would explain alot better
Cheers
Dean
-
tropicalontour tropicalontour https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=207157
- KVRist
- 494 posts since 11 May, 2009
Reality check - for most guitarists, recording consisted of taking whatever stage amp they had with whatever speaker cab they happened to tour with, placing it in an overpriced and usually inadequately designed studio acoustic space wherever the drum kit wasn't, taking whatever mic was left after the vocals and drums were properly mic'ed up, running it through an indifferent analogue board into a poorly aligned multitrack tape machine with lifed out heads to second hand tape stock. If your amp sim improves on that situation, believe me, you really are up.
My music is a fusion of jazz and funk. It's called "Junk"
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
NEKRO.MACHINE wrote:Hink i am talking about a 4x12 with mis-matched speakers inside (deliberately), with an MD421, a Sontronics Sigma, a Sontronics Delta and C414 or similar LDC in cardiod mode and if in a decent room a U whatever is in the mic cupboard by Neumann further back so at my place/home studio it is not that many. Usually an MD421, e609 maybe one of the sontronics Ribbons or AudioTechnica AE2500 (dual-element capsule which is really dope on bass cabs also and really suited for kick drum mainly). I can usually crank up either my Marshall DSL50, Ampeg BR-1e, Blackstar HT-5 or Vox AD100VT Valvetronix heads through a choice of 3 cabs but usually the afforementioned 4x12" at my home space and deal with what little background noise issues there are (like Kids running in and ruining the perfect take...etc.). Luckily my place is a detached house but the internal noise is more of an issue than pissing any neighbour off! I also do use some plug-in solutions and it depends on what i need but i can get my phsyical rig and mic's setup quicker than mousing around the way i have my gear layed out/the width of my space sort of dictates that already. If the actual speakers in the cabinet were not deliberately mis-matched then i would probably use just two (3 tops) on it
I have made some Impulses of my setup but still, even then it feels like a second-best, not by as much as it used to though these days i must add
Hope that clears up what i mean and i am not the sort to add unecessary extras like more microphones as i keep things as simple as i can. Just that sometimes written down apprears to be/sounds more complex than it actually is if one were with me in the room it would explain alot better
Cheers
Dean
I hear yah (sorry, couldn't resist again
Putting the other speakers (if I swap them out) all in the 4x12 works, I was going to store the empty 4x12 away but instead I take up part of the back wall of our walk-in closet(with plenty to absorb the sound but a hardwood floor), there's no harm in building up^^^^^^
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
