1. I do not care for buying names, I prefer to buy guitars. The mark up for the Gibson name is absurd.nix808 wrote: I know Hink has an aversion to Gibsons, what is it particularly that irks about them?
2. Les Pauls, I do not find them a comfortable guitar for me working always in a studio environment. They are just too heavy.
3. Stop Bar tail pieces, again they just are not comfortable for me to play. Of course that is just a matter of taste but for me it's a big one. An SG feels like my action is way too high (this is all in my head but tough to get around)
4. I'm not much of a fan of their necks the slim taper and some genuine old Les Paul Jr's. A one time very close friend plays nothing but Les Pauls with the exception of an SG doubleneck he had Gibson make for him in the early 80s to jimmy page's specs. He has one of the first generations of the Jimmy Page Les Paul and it has a slim taper neck that I kinda like but with that guitar you pay a fortune for two names. His son also had an Epiphone Les Paul and TBH it's the best Gibson product I ever played...but it needed better pups.
