I have had problems with all 3 bolt neck I have ever worked with.Hink wrote:googling it I dont see as many complaints as I have heard in person (but there are a few)...I hated it
Your next guitar?
- KVRist
- 358 posts since 12 Dec, 2006 from Cologne, Germany
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Oh noes!
http://www.ibanez.com/ElectricGuitars/model-JS1000
They have one that seems to be new at my local GC for about 1200 which seems to be a much better price than the norm.
I .......really...........don't...........need........another guitar
http://www.ibanez.com/ElectricGuitars/model-JS1000
They have one that seems to be new at my local GC for about 1200 which seems to be a much better price than the norm.
I .......really...........don't...........need........another guitar
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
I know what your talking about, but I never had those problems with mine.Hink wrote:googling it I dont see as many complaints as I have heard in person (but there are a few)...I hated it
I built my own guitar after that, with a tele teak wood body (heavy as hell)
Fender parts and a single pickup, with a kramer pacer neck.
It wasn't half as good as the older one, probably due to those DiMarzio's which where the perfect pickups imo.
I'm plan on adding 2 of those dual humbuckers, after some serious wood cutting, sometime in the future.
I also had an old Guild acoustic that was awesome.
It was my first guitar I got when I was 8, but sold that one long ago.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
Well I believe that some G&L are still the same (or were), I know I'm not the only one who had problems with it but I realize other people liked it enough for G&L to still use it.GermanFafian wrote:I have had problems with all 3 bolt neck I have ever worked with.Hink wrote:googling it I dont see as many complaints as I have heard in person (but there are a few)...I hated it
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 3864 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
'70s 7enders ...Hink wrote:Well I believe that some G&L are still the same (or were), I know I'm not the only one who had problems with it but I realize other people liked it enough for G&L to still use it.GermanFafian wrote:I have had problems with all 3 bolt neck I have ever worked with.Hink wrote:googling it I dont see as many complaints as I have heard in person (but there are a few)...I hated it
Great example of investors running a fine company into the ground.
The tilt neck problems were just as much caused by lack of precision with the woodworking.
When done properly the principle ain't too bad.
Ymmv,
susiwong
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
I agree, but from the machinist POV...working with wood rarely can be precise (when I talk about precision I'm talking at the very least +/- .005") because too many other factors influence wood as you know. So not only was it possibly the lack of precision but also the downside of wood and of course once the problem started it only got worse.susiwong wrote:'70s 7enders ...Hink wrote:Well I believe that some G&L are still the same (or were), I know I'm not the only one who had problems with it but I realize other people liked it enough for G&L to still use it.GermanFafian wrote:I have had problems with all 3 bolt neck I have ever worked with.Hink wrote:googling it I dont see as many complaints as I have heard in person (but there are a few)...I hated it![]()
Great example of investors running a fine company into the ground.![]()
The tilt neck problems were just as much caused by lack of precision with the woodworking.
When done properly the principle ain't too bad.
Ymmv,
susiwong
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 3864 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
Dunno, on most of my bolt-ons the neck pocket is extremely tight so even without screws the neck can't move (without strings).Hink wrote:I agree, but from the machinist POV...working with wood rarely can be precise (when I talk about precision I'm talking at the very least +/- .005") because too many other factors influence wood as you know. So not only was it possibly the lack of precision but also the downside of wood and of course once the problem started it only got worse.
Not the rule with '70s 7enders, I'm afraid.
Give or take 2 mm, who cares ?
In fact the lacklustre quality of these guitars and their Gibson contemporaries was what started the whole "vintage" thing - people were willing to pay big money for instruments that were better made than current production models of the day.
Paradoxically some clever businessmen extended the definition of "vintage" beyond sanity.
Some folks just want to be cheated ...
My personal view: the "vintage" era definitely ended somewhere in the 60s, depending on model - everything newer is just an old s/h guitar without any price bonus. Take it at face value.
Ymmv,
susiwong
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
of course you are right but I have to laugh at myself for your comment 'give or take 2 mm, who cares'susiwong wrote:Dunno, on most of my bolt-ons the neck pocket is extremely tight so even without screws the neck can't move (without strings).Hink wrote:I agree, but from the machinist POV...working with wood rarely can be precise (when I talk about precision I'm talking at the very least +/- .005") because too many other factors influence wood as you know. So not only was it possibly the lack of precision but also the downside of wood and of course once the problem started it only got worse.
Not the rule with '70s 7enders, I'm afraid.![]()
Give or take 2 mm, who cares ?
In fact the lacklustre quality of these guitars and their Gibson contemporaries was what started the whole "vintage" thing - people were willing to pay big money for instruments that were better made than current production models of the day.
Paradoxically some clever businessmen extended the definition of "vintage" beyond sanity.![]()
Some folks just want to be cheated ...![]()
My personal view: the "vintage" era definitely ended somewhere in the 60s, depending on model - everything newer is just an old s/h guitar without any price bonus. Take it at face value.
Ymmv,
susiwong
When I built that dulcimer I cared, but the reason is 4 years of schooling in machine shop it was so drilled into my head I can't help it. There I was with my machinist scale* (a machinist ruler), magnifying goggles and taking pictures with the scale in them using my macro lens to make sure I had everything exactly right, drilling in other pieces of wood for tests first and such...especially the compound angles the pins had to go in at...my wife asked the same thing "does it mstter thst much?"
Of course the answer was "it does to me"
*note I should get a pair of vernier calipers but I refuse to buy cheap ones and the good ones are just too much money for the little use I would give them.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 3864 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
You can take this literally, I've seen lots of 7enders from the Dark Ages with these tolerances.Hink wrote:I have to laugh at myself for your comment 'give or take 2 mm, who cares'
Sometimes we had to glue sanding paper (correct term ?) on the contact area to get the neck marginally stable.
Of course that's not how a good instrument is built.
Like you described, precision and attention to detail are absolute requirements.
Cheers,
susiwong
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
oh I have no doubt that Fender used similar tolerances, I remeber those Fender Leads noting the sloppiness of many of them. That's probably part of what fueled my dislike for buying names, it said Fender so it had to be good I think was the concept and I never found one I liked.susiwong wrote:You can take this literally, I've seen lots of 7enders from the Dark Ages with these tolerances.Hink wrote:I have to laugh at myself for your comment 'give or take 2 mm, who cares'![]()
Sometimes we had to glue sanding paper (correct term ?) on the contact area to get the neck marginally stable.![]()
Of course that's not how a good instrument is built.
Like you described, precision and attention to detail are absolute requirements.
Cheers,
susiwong
I once used an expired driver's license I had for a shim...I used the part with my name on it so if it ever got stolen I would have proof it was mine. Talk about a Perry mason moment huh? "Your honor, if you remove the neck you will see the guitar belonged to me"
As for attention to detail, well imho part of the problem is machines are taking over and they only do what they are told. I am/was cnc certified and I think part of the reason I didn't stick with being a machinist was I didn't want to be a machine operator. I was a foolish kid and wasn't willing to put in my time, I wanted to go right to a model/prototype shop
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- KVRAF
- 20820 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
I think he's being facetious.Hink wrote:I have to laugh at myself for your comment 'give or take 2 mm, who cares'
FWIW, the Tele Deluxe I built using a 70's Japanese knock-off body (4-bolt), "Power Sound" humbuckers (as found in early Ibanez's), and Chandler neck is the best Tele Deluxe I've ever played. In fact, when I swapped out the Chandler for a Fender reissue 72 Deluxe neck, I liked it considerably less.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
That's what you get for messing with perfectionUncle E wrote:I think he's being facetious.Hink wrote:I have to laugh at myself for your comment 'give or take 2 mm, who cares'
FWIW, the Tele Deluxe I built using a 70's Japanese knock-off body (4-bolt), "Power Sound" humbuckers (as found in early Ibanez's), and Chandler neck is the best Tele Deluxe I've ever played. In fact, when I swapped out the Chandler for a Fender reissue 72 Deluxe neck, I liked it considerably less.
What's your take on the three bolt fender necks?
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 3864 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
Hink wrote:oh I have no doubt that Fender used similar tolerances, I remeber those Fender Leads noting the sloppiness of many of them. That's probably part of what fueled my dislike for buying names, it said Fender so it had to be good I think was the concept and I never found one I liked.
I once used an expired driver's license I had for a shim...I used the part with my name on it so if it ever got stolen I would have proof it was mine. Talk about a Perry mason moment huh? "Your honor, if you remove the neck you will see the guitar belonged to me"
As for attention to detail, well imho part of the problem is machines are taking over and they only do what they are told. I am/was cnc certified and I think part of the reason I didn't stick with being a machinist was I didn't want to be a machine operator. I was a foolish kid and wasn't willing to put in my time, I wanted to go right to a model/prototype shop
While I don't think good production line guitars (e.g. MIJ Ibanez, ESP) can hold a candle to a good hand-built instrument, I have to admit precision and consistency are a lot better than in the G or F custom shops.
Which matters with mail orders I guess.
Still, I prefer to play an instrument before purchase and rather take some months to find a keeper ...
Ymmv,
susiwong
-
- KVRist
- 417 posts since 13 Nov, 2002 from On the ledge over the edge
Next 6 stringy thing for me will likely be some sort of Tele.
I don't have a Tele guitar yet, but think one would be good to have.
Any opinions on the current Fender models ?
I don't have a Tele guitar yet, but think one would be good to have.
Any opinions on the current Fender models ?
I don't have anything against gravity but it really does weigh me down