Equality VS Pro-Q (final answer, Equality).
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
-
- KVRian
- 1087 posts since 12 Jul, 2009 from Brighton
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 1087 posts since 12 Jul, 2009 from Brighton
Btw, how are you getting on with the questions in my email?
I can't help but feel that that might be an even better solution to your dilemma.
Dave.
I can't help but feel that that might be an even better solution to your dilemma.
Dave.
[ DMGAudio ] | [ DMGAudio Blog ] | dave AT dmgaudio DOT com
-
- KVRian
- 871 posts since 20 Jun, 2010
I voted for Pro-Q because IMO it has the more ergonomic GUI.
I've tested EQuality for two(or three?) demo periods, but although it has some nice features it doesn't fit my workflow.
Got confused constantly when the coloured dots in the analyser didn't have the same order like the bands below.
I finally gave up when I tried to "emulate" a pultec in Equality and realised you can't have two low shelfs(though this might have changed meanwhile)
I found that EQuality can't replace all my "character" EQs so I would use it mainly as a "surgery" EQ but for this task the UI from Pro-Q is much more intuitive.
So IMO Pro-Q is straight forward digital EQing without magic, while EQuality has potential to provide some magic... but you have to get along with it's workflow (and you should probably have good eyes
)
Cheers,
Doc
I've tested EQuality for two(or three?) demo periods, but although it has some nice features it doesn't fit my workflow.
Got confused constantly when the coloured dots in the analyser didn't have the same order like the bands below.
I finally gave up when I tried to "emulate" a pultec in Equality and realised you can't have two low shelfs(though this might have changed meanwhile)
I found that EQuality can't replace all my "character" EQs so I would use it mainly as a "surgery" EQ but for this task the UI from Pro-Q is much more intuitive.
So IMO Pro-Q is straight forward digital EQing without magic, while EQuality has potential to provide some magic... but you have to get along with it's workflow (and you should probably have good eyes
Cheers,
Doc
-
- Banned
- 395 posts since 21 Dec, 2010 from Vermont, USA

having said that...EQuality
EDIT: man, don't those look soooo good right now?
-
- KVRian
- 1087 posts since 12 Jul, 2009 from Brighton
What he said ^^ .bezusheist wrote:
having said that...EQuality
EDIT: man, don't those look soooo good right now?
Dave.
[ DMGAudio ] | [ DMGAudio Blog ] | dave AT dmgaudio DOT com
-
- KVRAF
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
No apples and oranges please... I'll vote for EQuality because IMO it's obviously better in sound quality!
-
- KVRian
- 1290 posts since 13 Mar, 2007
Another factor is that if you have EQuality , you get a discount on COMPASSION.
If you have Pro-Q , you will get discounts twoards other marvelous FF products ........
THis is pretty much a choice between diamonds encrusteed with gold or gold encrusted with diamonds ..... hard to go wrong.
If you have Pro-Q , you will get discounts twoards other marvelous FF products ........
THis is pretty much a choice between diamonds encrusteed with gold or gold encrusted with diamonds ..... hard to go wrong.
Financial solvency and KVR Mix as well as oil and water.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
