ImpOSCar2 Is Actually Here (Mac And PC), No Really, It Is
-
- KVRian
- 1174 posts since 29 Apr, 2008
Downloaded the demo with the plan of sampling presets that were particularly appealing. With some other synths I sometimes come away with only 2-3 sampled presets. I've only gone through basses with Imposcar and I've sampled several. Probably a good sign that I should just buy it.
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
Is that not frowned upon to download demos of synthesizers and sample them?
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
- KVRAF
- 14435 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
I can't imagine it not being.... since you after all have not purchased a license to use it in any form other than to demo it.
rsp
rsp
Last edited by zvenx on Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
I just asked this myself and it must be a short sample to eliminate the noise burst. Personally i never thought about doing samples from a demo version. If i would do i would not talk about it here at KVR i guess...@midnight wrote:Is that not frowned upon to download demos of synthesizers and sample them?
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
I have just checked my account at GForce. Everything looks OK now. The products i sold (Minimonsta + Oddity) are removed now.Ingonator wrote:In my case there was the opposite problem. Both Imposcar 1 + 2 appeared in my account at the new website (like they should) but also Oddity and Minimonsta again which i sold some time ago. I have contacted Chris about this.stimresp wrote:I bought Imposcar1 in the marketplace a few months back, but when I go into my account on the new website there is no sign of it. Anyone else having this issue?
Ingo
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
-
- KVRian
- 770 posts since 2 Apr, 2003
I'm a serious developer, and I do, in this context where he's avoiding paying for it.Shy wrote:No serious developer is gonna care if someone samples their synth.
I and others have put a great deal of work into producing those sounds, not only me developing the synth itself, and people helping test it, but also the people who worked on making and perfecting those patches.
Is it too much to ask that people who want to use those sounds give something back in return, i.e. pay for what I think is a very reasonably priced synth?
Seems to me to just be bad manners realy, both to those behind the sounds, and people who've joined the club by purchasing, like somebody gatecrashing a party and drinking the booze that everyone else brought.
Last edited by JonHodgson on Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
I was thinking of sampling the noiseburst. Sounds like old vinyl. 
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRian
- 1039 posts since 13 Sep, 2006
I can relate to this. I wonder what the original post was up to. Bragging about sampling demo-versions to me looks like pure intent to upset devs ?JonHodgson wrote:I'm a serious developer, and I do, in this context where he's avoiding paying for it.Shy wrote:No serious developer is gonna care if someone samples their synth.
I and others have put a great deal of work into producing those sounds, not only me developing the synth itself, and people helping test it, but also the people who worked on making and perfecting those patches.
Is it too much to ask that people who want to use those sounds give something back in return, i.e. pay for what I think is a very reasonably priced synth?
Seems to me to just be bad manners realy, both to those behind the sounds, and people who've joined the club by purchasing, like somebody gatecrashing a party and drinking the booze that everyone else brought.
-
- KVRAF
- 5139 posts since 27 Jun, 2004
I'm all for buying a product if I like the sounds I can get from it, but if I made a synth (-synth-, not sampler/rompler, and either software or hardware) and someone's demands from it were so low that sampling it to play back some notes later was enough for them, it wouldn't bother me. The vast majority of the sounds a synth that isn't very simple could make can't be adequately "sampled" as far as I'm concerned and if someone didn't care about that and settled for samples, then it would tell me he doesn't need the actual synth in the first place. Frustrating for a serious synth maker or synth patch/preset maker, maybe, not because someone sampled their work, but because someone doesn't appreciate their work enough to buy it and enough to understand it and not settle for sampling of it. That really is frustrating, but what can ya do.JonHodgson wrote:I'm a serious developer, and I do, in this context where he's avoiding paying for it.Shy wrote:No serious developer is gonna care if someone samples their synth.
I and others have put a great deal of work into producing those sounds, not only me developing the synth itself, and people helping test it, but also the people who worked on making and perfecting those patches.
Is it too much to ask that people who want to use those sounds give something back in return, i.e. pay for what I think is a very reasonably priced synth?
Seems to me to just be bad manners realy, both to those behind the sounds, and people who've joined the club by purchasing, like somebody gatecrashing a party and drinking the booze that everyone else brought.
"Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi
- KVRAF
- 5817 posts since 8 May, 2008 from ssssskipping ......... I left you there
Shy wrote:I'm all for buying a product if I like the sounds I can get from it, but if I made a synth (-synth-, not sampler/rompler, and either software or hardware) and someone's demands from it were so low that sampling it to play back some notes later was enough for them, it wouldn't bother me. The vast majority of the sounds a synth that isn't very simple could make can't be adequately "sampled" as far as I'm concerned and if someone didn't care about that and settled for samples, then it would tell me he doesn't need the actual synth in the first place. Frustrating for a serious synth maker or synth patch/preset maker, maybe, not because someone sampled their work, but because someone doesn't appreciate their work enough to buy it and enough to understand it and not settle for sampling of it. That really is frustrating, but what can ya do.JonHodgson wrote:I'm a serious developer, and I do, in this context where he's avoiding paying for it.Shy wrote:No serious developer is gonna care if someone samples their synth.
I and others have put a great deal of work into producing those sounds, not only me developing the synth itself, and people helping test it, but also the people who worked on making and perfecting those patches.
Is it too much to ask that people who want to use those sounds give something back in return, i.e. pay for what I think is a very reasonably priced synth?
Seems to me to just be bad manners realy, both to those behind the sounds, and people who've joined the club by purchasing, like somebody gatecrashing a party and drinking the booze that everyone else brought.
BS
- KVRAF
- 5817 posts since 8 May, 2008 from ssssskipping ......... I left you there
On a par with yours.
