Is FL10 the most popular DAW used by Trance Producers ?
- KVRAF
- 1928 posts since 23 Sep, 2005
Hello...
Is FL10 the most popular DAW with Trance Producers these days ?
Is Propellerhead 'Reason & Record / Reason 6' a very popular DAW as well for Trance production ?
As far my observations go, I notice that most Trance Producers are using FL10, although some use other DAWs, ie. Live, Reason, Cubase, Logic Pro, ...etc. but it seems like FL10 wins the popularity prize so far.
Is this a pretty realistic picture as far as popularity of FL10 among Trance Producers ?
A bit of feedback would be fun, and useful.
Thanks,
Muziksculp
Is FL10 the most popular DAW with Trance Producers these days ?
Is Propellerhead 'Reason & Record / Reason 6' a very popular DAW as well for Trance production ?
As far my observations go, I notice that most Trance Producers are using FL10, although some use other DAWs, ie. Live, Reason, Cubase, Logic Pro, ...etc. but it seems like FL10 wins the popularity prize so far.
Is this a pretty realistic picture as far as popularity of FL10 among Trance Producers ?
A bit of feedback would be fun, and useful.
Thanks,
Muziksculp
- KVRAF
- 12223 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
I don't think anybody is going to be able to definitively answer that question for many reasons, the most obvious being, that defining "trance producer" is not a simple thing to quantify. Moreover, why the hell does it matter? FLS is very popular among trance producers and producers of many other genres.
The one thing that we can say about FLS users is that they are the most insecure DAW users on the planet, always looking for ways to legitimize their choice. If it works, just use it and stop worrying about who is and isn't using it, or what other DAW users think of it.
The one thing that we can say about FLS users is that they are the most insecure DAW users on the planet, always looking for ways to legitimize their choice. If it works, just use it and stop worrying about who is and isn't using it, or what other DAW users think of it.
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Deepmind 12D | Slim Phatty | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
That's because it doesn't sound as good as Cubase or Live.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
- KVRAF
- 8237 posts since 22 Sep, 2008 from Windsor. UK
No it is not the most popular DAW among trance producers.
It's probably the most popular among the warez kiddies that post really bad trance tutorials all over Youtube though, almost always in combination with a skinned version of Sylenth.
It's probably the most popular among the warez kiddies that post really bad trance tutorials all over Youtube though, almost always in combination with a skinned version of Sylenth.
Soundcloud | Facebook |
-
AstralExistence AstralExistence https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=265049
- KVRAF
- 2276 posts since 19 Sep, 2011
yes because all daws, like fx have there own soundMushy Mushy wrote:That's because it doesn't sound as good as Cubase or Live.
Last edited by AstralExistence on Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 8563 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
Are you talking mainstream working people, or just KVR members?
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
AstralExistence wrote:yes because all daws, like fx have there own soundMushy Mushy wrote:That's because it doesn't sound as good as Cubase or Live.logic sounds the best on mac, and cubase sounds the best on pc
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1928 posts since 23 Sep, 2005
Mainstream, professionals, a matures, ...etcRunBeerRun wrote:Are you talking mainstream working people, or just KVR members?
Not specific to KVR forum.
-
AstralExistence AstralExistence https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=265049
- KVRAF
- 2276 posts since 19 Sep, 2011
if you asked somethign like, 'does fl studio have such and such features, then you would proably get a better answer. but your basicly asking, which daw can i buy which will make me a pro or feel like one. invest in tools and dont invest in daw confidenceMuziksculp wrote:Mainstream, professionals, a matures, ...etcRunBeerRun wrote:Are you talking mainstream working people, or just KVR members?
Not specific to KVR forum.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1928 posts since 23 Sep, 2005
My question is very clear, I'm not asking about features, but rather, popularity.
I see nothing odd about asking this on KVR.
If you don't have any thing helpful, then that's a different story !
I see nothing odd about asking this on KVR.
If you don't have any thing helpful, then that's a different story !
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
Then cryophonik's reply has your answer. Add to that the fact that few music software makers are going to provide sales figures. Given these factors, how could anyone judge "popularity" in a meaningful way?Muziksculp wrote:My question is very clear, I'm not asking about features, but rather, popularity.
In other words: You won't find the answer here, and probably can't find it anywhere else either. Fortunately, the question isn't important. Use what works for you.
-
- KVRAF
- 16977 posts since 23 Jun, 2010 from north of London ON
Most music devs are still privately owned hence trying to get sales figures is next to impossible...Meffy wrote:Then cryophonik's reply has your answer. Add to that the fact that few music software makers are going to provide sales figures. Given these factors, how could anyone judge "popularity" in a meaningful way?Muziksculp wrote:My question is very clear, I'm not asking about features, but rather, popularity.
In other words: You won't find the answer here, and probably can't find it anywhere else either. Fortunately, the question isn't important. Use what works for you.
I also suggest the same thing..use what works for you...
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
-
AstralExistence AstralExistence https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=265049
- KVRAF
- 2276 posts since 19 Sep, 2011
sorry dude, what i meant was, what evrybodys saying to you. use what works. doesnt matter if its 'popular' if you like it. then you like writing in it. when i was looking into what id like to do as a job, i remember i kept looking for the highest paying job. but the counselour said, 'whatever you choose, you will make money from. because you enjoy it. replace job with dawMuziksculp wrote:My question is very clear, I'm not asking about features, but rather, popularity.
I see nothing odd about asking this on KVR.
If you don't have any thing helpful, then that's a different story !
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10249 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
I've seen mostly commercial (that is, people making money off their music) producers in Trance using Logic and some using Cubase
I'm not familiar with too many using Fruity Loops not to say there aren't any...
I see a lot of newcomers who use Fruity.. and I'm sure it is as powerful as it needs to be to write commercial Trance.. I simply don't see the slant towards it that you do.
Either way.. its already been said.. host is largely a host.. find the one that best fits YOU and use it..
The host software doesn't write the music.. it only plays back what you (the producer) input. Don't mistake knowing audio software for knowing music theory or genre specific technique with this theory.
I'm not familiar with too many using Fruity Loops not to say there aren't any...
I see a lot of newcomers who use Fruity.. and I'm sure it is as powerful as it needs to be to write commercial Trance.. I simply don't see the slant towards it that you do.
Either way.. its already been said.. host is largely a host.. find the one that best fits YOU and use it..
The host software doesn't write the music.. it only plays back what you (the producer) input. Don't mistake knowing audio software for knowing music theory or genre specific technique with this theory.
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
Most hosts do basically the same. They just have a different GUI/workflow. It doesn't matter what others use, just use what works best for YOU 
Cheers
Dennis
Cheers
Dennis