u-He Zebra II Vs Arturia Complete (Analog)

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Echoes in the Attic wrote:
Urs wrote: Or you simply wait for Zebra2.6 which will inherit a meticulously modelled transistor ladder filter from Diva ;)

Urs
Cool. Will it be a mode in XMF rather than a whole new module?? I hope so. Since I find the XMFs can do pretty much anything I need in Zebra, I use those for control templates and such, so it's nice when new filter types are added there, rather than the old filter modules or new modules.

cheers
Yep, I had XMF in mind, at least for the "naive" model. As the XMF calculates 4 filters in parallel, it would be overkill to use our delayless feedback modeling technique for that. Unless maybe we make it an option.

I have also planned a new type of filter module much like the state variables in Filterscape, which lets you crossfade between different filter responses. In addition it would have different models (think Ladder, SVF, Sallen-Key). This one would "only" be stereo, so it might get that extra juice.

Post

SVF would rock in Zebra! You think you could add it in 2.6, with all those options? That would likely make me pull the trigger and finally buy Zebra, to get rid of C-E-B-R-A! :D

Post

Ingonator wrote:After being so stupid to sell a Minimoog Model D (mint condition) back in 2005 and after trying many Moog emulations and other softsynths to get the typical Moog sound i finally ended up purchasing a Moog Slim Phaty rack which is not too expensive (799 Euros).
Hope you didn't pay that, because they're a good 130 euros less over at Digital Village, complete with 4 year warranty (gotta love how they're always trying to "one up" Thomann ;) )

Look forward to trying Diva and really hoping it satisfies on those fronts too, otherwise I'll probably spend the winter holidays with a Slim Phatty seeing if it can do any better. I think it's off to a good start with the GUI, as the layout and colours are easy on the eyes (mine at least). Curious to see what's hiding under the modifications and trimmers tabs on Diva too :)

Post

PAK wrote:
Ingonator wrote:After being so stupid to sell a Minimoog Model D (mint condition) back in 2005 and after trying many Moog emulations and other softsynths to get the typical Moog sound i finally ended up purchasing a Moog Slim Phaty rack which is not too expensive (799 Euros).
Hope you didn't pay that, because they're a good 130 euros less over at Digital Village, complete with 4 year warranty (gotta love how they're always trying to "one up" Thomann ;) )
Yes, i have paid 799 Euros at my local shop (PPC Music in Hannover, Germany) a few months ago. The price at Digital Village is really great. It's around 116 Euros less at the German Digital village website. If you take the VAT and delivery cost into account the difference is maybe not as huge anymore.


Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1

Post

Ingonator wrote:If you take the VAT and delivery cost into account the difference is maybe not as huge anymore.
The VAT's already included in that price, and delivery is 10 € to Germany ;)

Post

PAK wrote:
Ingonator wrote:If you take the VAT and delivery cost into account the difference is maybe not as huge anymore.
The VAT's already included in that price, and delivery is 10 € to Germany ;)
:cry: :cry: :cry:


So there is almost no excuse now to not get a real Moog then...

Or to buy 5 of them and do a poly-chain:
http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phatt ... #demos-tab
:o :o :o


Ingo
Last edited by Ingonator on Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1

Post

Except the new Moogs are a far cry from a real vintage Model D...

Post

EvilDragon wrote:Except the new Moogs are a far cry from a real vintage Model D...
About the Phattys:_ Count in a low price, memory storage, adjustable filter (1-4 poles), continuous waveforms (+ wave morph), arpeggiator, OSc Sync, full ADSR envelopes and additional mod routing (Crossmodulation, S&H) and there you go. Not to forget USB implementation, a auto-tune feature and a editor software.

Last but not least with the adjustable filter overload you could get REALLY fat sounds!!


Ingo
Last edited by Ingonator on Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1

Post

I was talking about the sound, not the features. Sorry for being vague there. The sound is still to my ears inferior to a real Model D... It simply lacks something, some presence, and the charm of the original. It's a lot colder sounding to me.

Post

EvilDragon wrote:The sound is still to my ears inferior to a real Model D... It simply lacks something, some presence, and the charm of the original. It's a lot colder sounding to me.
Don't forget the filter overload (=filter drive). This adds lots of "Balls" to the sound of the Phatty.

BTW i have made a bank of 100 presets for the Slim Phatty/Little Phatty. I'll try to do audio demos soon and publish the bank when this is finished.
Currently a few applications for a new "real world" job are running so maybe i'll have less time soon.


Ingo
Last edited by Ingonator on Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1

Post

It's all cool. Different tastes for different people I guess. I say nothing touches THAT character of the original, over 30 years old vintage D, from my experience.

Post

Zebra with Arturia compare? What are you doing? Comparing apples and pears? :dog:

Post

PietW. wrote:Comparing apples and pears? :dog:
Zebras and donkeys?

Post

PietW. wrote:Zebra with Arturia compare? What are you doing? Comparing apples and pears? :dog:
indeed :)
http://www.lelotusbleu.fr Synth Presets

77 Exclusive Soundbanks for 23 synths, 8 Sound Designers, Hours of audio Demos. The Sound you miss might be there

Post

OK, so I downloaded Zebra II last night. My first thoughts are that it's like someone took all the best bits from the NI Komplete package and crammed them in to one very good, easy to use package. I've always said that 1 good semi-modular synth would be better than 100 bits and pieces of synths.
it's quite difficult to program and the interface is confusing IMO.
That couldn't be further form the truth. It might be hard if you are used to hard coded interfaces where you have a limited number of oscillators/filters etc. However, it has a very intuitive approach to modularisation of synth components.

However, I'm a little unimpressed with the lack of analog presets. They may be there, but I found it hard to find them. I had to flick through dozens to find some presets that were analog sounding. But, even then, I couldn't figure out what it was about the particular sound that made it sound analog. I think it was mostly detuning which is great but most digital synths have a detuning option anyway. So, the question is, which presets are analog, and how do you build an analog sound from scratch? I couldn't find anything on this in the manual.
Zebra with Arturia compare? What are you doing? Comparing apples and pears?
Please read the OP carefully. I'm looking for a synth or a set of synths that will cover the majoriy of my analog emulation needs. I was immediately attracted to the Arturia Complete package because it has loads of great analog sounds. However, many people have ushered me toward Zebra II instead because they claim that Zebra II does better analog emulation. So, the comparison is not about the overall features of Arturia Vs. Zebra. It's about how well the two packages fair at emulating analog sounds, and their depth of coverage in the area of analog sounds.

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”