KVR Audio

jupiter8 · Post by **jupiter8** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:05 pm

SJ_Digriz wrote: Yes, except get rid of the empty block and brown space above the TCP so the TCP can be there.

But then you would only be able to see the track,not the items on that track but i guess it would be useful.

As a user i say: Why not ? But the programmer in me says: Hell no! That's ugly and just plain wrong. So i can understand why they won't do that.

SJ_Digriz wrote:EDIT: at least you listen to good tunes on that track

Actually i don't listen to Elton John,i think he's dreadful. I was experimenting with something and needed a long track name and that was the first thing that popped in my mind. It works in mysterious ways.

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:13 pm

Yes!!!

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:19 pm

but i may not have bought it/discovered its the best host for me if it was not for the demo system!

deleted · Post by **deleted** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:55 pm

DELETED

SJ_Digriz · Post by **SJ_Digriz** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:16 pm

jupiter8 wrote:
SJ_Digriz wrote: Yes, except get rid of the empty block and brown space above the TCP so the TCP can be there.
But then you would only be able to see the track,not the items on that track but i guess it would be useful.

Actually, you are correct. Having the TCP there makes little sense. When I was fiddling with the new interface I was trying to get the transport there and have a horizontal keyboard across the top. I wanted to do things with strictly the capabilities in the default GUI. Anyhow, For some reason, I can't remember the discussion now, I thought there was a reason the default tool set was etched in stone at that location. But, my brain is ignoring my request for info.

SJ_Digriz wrote:EDIT: at least you listen to good tunes on that track

Actually i don't listen to Elton John,i think he's dreadful. I was experimenting with something and needed a long track name and that was the first thing that popped in my mind. It works in mysterious ways.[/quote]
LOL, I agree for post Yellow Brick road albums. But, I do like a lot of his earlier stuff.

SJ_Digriz · Post by **SJ_Digriz** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:18 pm

hibidy wrote:Almost there guys..........

far too optimistic, this forum has at least 198023480980981293837283785409838473892384783947e7849873478
posts to go.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:52 pm

I only lost 10 bucks. Not a high stakes gambler.........

OT, I think I'll go to IGC today and get my overdose of ciggy smoke, scary people really loud clangy noises.

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:03 pm

I think I know why Reaper is full of options and customizations, they want the user to do the dirty work to make something more useful out of a Chinese menu.
Why spend time in creating a user friendly interface simply efficient and effective workflow (because probably they lost the way to it by focusing to add to the kitchen basket. Here! This is the knife,pots and vegetables. Chop it and cook it yourself. BUT I thought a was in a 5 Star restaurant! Nope! $60 it is just a buffet. Just Kidding or... maybe not

Dean Aka Nekro · Post by **Dean Aka Nekro** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:19 pm

djsubject wrote:but i may not have bought it/discovered its the best host for me if it was not for the demo system!

Same really, Along with a barage of well meening users mentioning it so often. I did/do have the super cheapo bastard v0.9.99 beta/last 'free' version somewhere which was alright but not until late v3 did i eventually think it would be a good buy, I still have not scratched the surface with it or used it to work on anything due to old habits and would love some time to get more into it. That time will come eventually. Curiosity killed this cat

Regarding the question would i pay more for it than i did do if it were priced higher? I do not know as of the above mentioned reason

Do i think it is excellent value for money? Hell yes

If i were not so stuck in my ways and just starting out then i would probably be using REAPER instead of what i am so used to, I would not ever want to do without Ableton Live though so it would be a combo of both

Can i borrow anyone's free time to try out aload of things that i would like to? Please

All the best to all

Dean

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:21 pm

liquidsound wrote:I think I know why Reaper is full of options and customizations, they want the user to do the dirty work to make something more useful out of a Chinese menu.
Why spend time in creating a user friendly interface simply efficient and effective workflow (because probably they lost the way to it by focusing to add to the kitchen basket. Here! This is the knife,pots and vegetables. Chop it and cook it yourself. BUT I thought a was in a 5 Star restaurant! Nope! $60 it is just a buffet. Just Kidding or... maybe not

It's gotta be that

Arglebargle · Post by **Arglebargle** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:28 pm

liquidsound wrote:I think I know why Reaper is full of options and customizations, they want the user to do the dirty work to make something more useful out of a Chinese menu.
Why spend time in creating a user friendly interface simply efficient and effective workflow (because probably they lost the way to it by focusing to add to the kitchen basket. Here! This is the knife,pots and vegetables. Chop it and cook it yourself. BUT I thought a was in a 5 Star restaurant! Nope! $60 it is just a buffet. Just Kidding or... maybe not

That's a plus for me. Given a choice between a DAW fighting me and being restrictive, or being able to get tweaky, I'll choose the latter.

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:25 pm

Arglebargle wrote:
liquidsound wrote:I think I know why Reaper is full of options and customizations, they want the user to do the dirty work to make something more useful out of a Chinese menu.
Why spend time in creating a user friendly interface simply efficient and effective workflow (because probably they lost the way to it by focusing to add to the kitchen basket. Here! This is the knife,pots and vegetables. Chop it and cook it yourself. BUT I thought a was in a 5 Star restaurant! Nope! $60 it is just a buffet. Just Kidding or... maybe not
That's a plus for me. Given a choice between a DAW fighting me and being restrictive, or being able to get tweaky, I'll choose the latter.

Then I suggest Max for Live rather then Reaper for Life

standalone · Post by **standalone** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:16 pm

So now we know why Reaper and Ikea are both so cheap.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:19 pm

f**k, I take a nap and this thing is just at a near standstill

You ba...'s lost me 10 bucks and now you are going to stop?????????????????????????

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:40 pm

This topic became a TechSupp between Reaper and Cubase: the most frustrated users in the DAWs world. So if you pay $60 or $500 you get the same problems.
The thing is that most of them use both

= Double problems for $560.
Go figure!

Would you still buy Reaper if it will cost you as much as the other DAWs ?