Cheers
Dennis
I have Ultra Analog and I really like it. To the guy who says he's never used it on a 70s progrockesque track, I say he didn't spend enough time tweaking because it can get there for sure. It's low on CPU and sounds great. However... AAS is like a sea turtle in terms of development. It laid the egg (release) and then spent time covering it with sand (bug fixes) and when that was done, it dragged it's ponderous bulk back into the sea...braj wrote:
You can kinda get an idea of the textures and 'mood' I'm after, to my ears Ultra Analog sounds really deep and warm, but I admittedly don't have much experience.
No, but the statistical analysis of the prediction error was switched from a running average filter to an envelope follower with asymmetric attack/decay. Looks very promisingpaterpeter wrote:Don't compile in debug mode? Switching from QBasic to C++?Urs wrote:On a positive note: Clemens found a nifty improvement that makes Diva up to 20% less hungry...Anyway, looking forward to it.
Lol? How couldn't you have done something that obvious right from the start? Damn n00bsUrs wrote:No, but the statistical analysis of the prediction error was switched from a running average filter to an envelope follower with asymmetric attack/decay. Looks very promisingpaterpeter wrote:Don't compile in debug mode? Switching from QBasic to C++?Urs wrote:On a positive note: Clemens found a nifty improvement that makes Diva up to 20% less hungry...Anyway, looking forward to it.
That's easy... just switch to the eco or dco oscillator and you readily have lots of simple sweet sounds. Those osc's use less cpu also.sabiwa wrote:I prefer Ultra Analog over Diva simply because I don't have time to sculpt Diva's hugeness to make it fit in the mix.
One really cool thing I noticed about Diva is that when you switch components, you get a good approximation of the other component settings with the new one, so similar resonance settings for instance are maintained, it isn't like a drastic change when sculpting sounds. And the Diva UI isn't overly complex with too many (to me) mysterious functions. Maybe I'm just getting old and inflexible thoughpdxindy wrote:That's easy... just switch to the eco or dco oscillator and you readily have lots of simple sweet sounds. Those osc's use less cpu also.sabiwa wrote:I prefer Ultra Analog over Diva simply because I don't have time to sculpt Diva's hugeness to make it fit in the mix.
Yeah I still have it on my radar, my limited experience with it was that I could get nice sounds fast from it, I really like the GUI even if the knobs are small. And especially as a good first-synth to use on my laptop, it is still very attractive.Aiyn wrote:You can pick Ultra Analog really cheap here and sell it for about the same price if you don't like it. The process for selling with AAS is really simple, no fees and no NFR restriction. It really is a no-brainer.
I bought it ages ago second hand and took me a while to even properly explore it. Having made a sound-bank for it I can say this: Its got a lot of neat features. It is really inviting to program. I intended to make 128 presets and ended up with 180. The way its laid out its so easy to program classic sounds. I like being able to see everything.
I think it excels at leads and pads. Its got a lot of great colours and the formant filter is useful for much more than vocal sounds. Its a really good synth at the prices I've seen it go for.
Of course DIVA has a lot of advantages but I've not as much experience with it yet.
Congratulations on getting Diva.braj wrote:Alrighty then, the right amount of funds miraculously became available today so I bought DivaYay!
Congratulationsbraj wrote:Alrighty then, the right amount of funds miraculously became available today so I bought DivaYay!
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026