AmpliTube Version 3.7.1 Now Available! Optimized: 30% to 40% less CPU & RAM
-
- KVRian
- 804 posts since 20 Aug, 2005 from Ann Arbor, MI
I can verify that I was able to get to my user area and download both the Windows and Mac versions. No 403 here.
Tom Smith
http://tomsmith.bandcamp.com - http://www.filkertom.com - http://www.thefump.com
Win10/64 - I5 3570K - 16 GB RAM - BIAB 2016 - Reaper 5 - Sound Forge Pro 9
http://tomsmith.bandcamp.com - http://www.filkertom.com - http://www.thefump.com
Win10/64 - I5 3570K - 16 GB RAM - BIAB 2016 - Reaper 5 - Sound Forge Pro 9
-
- KVRAF
- 1981 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
VstHost clearly reports: Initial Delay: 7 samples.Peter - IK Multimedia wrote:I was told no latency should have been introduced (obviously not on purpose) but of course we have developers looking into it.
-
- KVRian
- 1394 posts since 28 Mar, 2002 from Austria
Wow, 7 samples latency. This is 0.0x ms ?!asseca wrote:VstHost clearly reports: Initial Delay: 7 samples.Peter - IK Multimedia wrote:I was told no latency should have been introduced (obviously not on purpose) but of course we have developers looking into it.
It's less latency than all soundcards on this planet can handle.
Does anyone notice latency under 1ms when played live (at least not me) ?
And for 'not live' usage we have PDC in our host.
Although 256 samples latency for live usage is another story.
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
Reaper 4 shows the same thing, actually. It shows two numbers for each plug-in, one I believe is the reported plug-in latency, and the second is what the final total is for all active plug-ins. For some reason, it shows 7 samples when you activate AT 3.5, but the total jumps up by 256 samples. I have no idea what this means.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 1981 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
7 samples is 0.16ms latency at a sample-rate of 44100.PeterL wrote:Wow, 7 samples latency. This is 0.0x ms ?!asseca wrote:VstHost clearly reports: Initial Delay: 7 samples.Peter - IK Multimedia wrote:I was told no latency should have been introduced (obviously not on purpose) but of course we have developers looking into it.
It's less latency than all soundcards on this planet can handle.
Does anyone notice latency under 1ms when played live (at least not me) ?
And for 'not live' usage we have PDC in our host.
Although 256 samples latency for live usage is another story.
The problem is that Reaper's DPC works in multiples of block-size. While previous versions of Amplitube has 0 Initial Delay, Amplitube now introduces this small amount of 7 samples, which now triggers the PDC to kick in with a delay of one block-size which could be (depending on ASIO settings) anything from 32 to 512 ms, so for some users suddenly this is a major issue !!
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
Yea, like a 256 sample sized issue.
If this is really what's happening, I'm not sure what to say. Reaper shouldn't be translating 7 samples into 256 by default, that makes no programming sense whatsoever.
If this is really what's happening, I'm not sure what to say. Reaper shouldn't be translating 7 samples into 256 by default, that makes no programming sense whatsoever.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
Confirmed---all other non-convolution and non-linear phase plug-ins (except UAD) report 0 latency and Reaper doesn't add any. AT 3.5 now reports 7 (why?) and Reaper adds one total block size based on your card latency settings. In my case it's 256.
I'm hoping this is a fluke and there is no processing necessity that introduces the 7 samples, otherwise we have traded one pretty serious problem for another, at least in my host. I'd still take this over serious over-usage of RAM, though.
I'm hoping this is a fluke and there is no processing necessity that introduces the 7 samples, otherwise we have traded one pretty serious problem for another, at least in my host. I'd still take this over serious over-usage of RAM, though.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 5524 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Mars Colony
Then I guess it's good that most plug-ins report 0 latency. Efficient or not for the DAW, 7 transforming into 256 is extremely inefficient for the end user.
"You don’t expect much beyond a gaping, misspelled void when you stare into the cold dark place that is Internet comments."
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
---Salon on internet trolls attacking Cleveland kidnapping victim Amanda Berry
-
- KVRAF
- 2118 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Athens, Greece
So the new version's RAM requirement is about 150MB less than the previous one, but still it's unusable for me. Right now it needs 240 MB when Amplitube2 needs half of it and a typical rack in GuitarRig eats about 100MB or so.
It's a pity because in general I like Amplitube's amps more than GuitarRig but I'm on WinXP 32-bit and can't afford to spend my precious RAM on Amplitube in my mixes.
It's a pity because in general I like Amplitube's amps more than GuitarRig but I'm on WinXP 32-bit and can't afford to spend my precious RAM on Amplitube in my mixes.
-
- KVRist
- 393 posts since 12 Sep, 2005 from NYC
updated last night:
1 thing surprised me with this, downloaded & installed last night& DP7.24 didn't do a AU inspection.Just looks like it overwrote and optimized Amplitude without AU needing to be re-examined.Anyone else get this? strange, never saw this before.
I checked to make sure it was updated and info window says 3.7.1
Thanks
1 thing surprised me with this, downloaded & installed last night& DP7.24 didn't do a AU inspection.Just looks like it overwrote and optimized Amplitude without AU needing to be re-examined.Anyone else get this? strange, never saw this before.
I checked to make sure it was updated and info window says 3.7.1
Thanks
Last edited by kgdrum on Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2012 Mac Pro,3.46 Ghz,12 core 96g ,Mojave,RME, DP11.01, Logic 10.51,RME UCX, Great River ME-1NV, a few microphones,Spectrasonics, U-he Komplete12U & way too many VI's,Synths & FX galore!, UAD,Mimic Pro/SD3,Focal Twin 6 monitors, Shunyata ....
-
- KVRAF
- 10366 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
And if you add another instance of AT3 to the track you'll get 512. Reaper does indeed work in whole blocks sufficient to handle the pug-in delay announced by each plug-in.A.M. Gold wrote:Confirmed---all other non-convolution and non-linear phase plug-ins (except UAD) report 0 latency and Reaper doesn't add any. AT 3.5 now reports 7 (why?) and Reaper adds one total block size based on your card latency settings. In my case it's 256.
256 samples is about 5.8 milliseconds.
-------------
Edit: I've just added another FX as an Input FX in Reaper and the delay is shown as the actual delay announced by the plug-in, not a multiple of block sizes. Try that for AT3. I've no idea what that does to PDC.
-
- KVRist
- 431 posts since 3 Oct, 2009
Yes you do. Try freeze instead. It is a stacked freeze.Dr.Gunjah wrote:When using input fx you loose flexibility as you record the processed sound and not the DI sound, don't you?
OR record to two tracks at the same time.
-
- KVRian
- 871 posts since 20 Jun, 2010
hm I think then it's easier to just install the old AT3 build that didn't have latencybishop666 wrote:Yes you do. Try freeze instead. It is a stacked freeze.Dr.Gunjah wrote:When using input fx you loose flexibility as you record the processed sound and not the DI sound, don't you?
OR record to two tracks at the same time.
