KVR Audio

Resonator63 · Post by **Resonator63** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:11 pm

My arse sounds best especially after eating beans and drinking real ale

Now let that be an end to it

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:13 pm

maxxxter wrote:'better' is oversampled.

fixed

musikmachine · Post by **musikmachine** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:15 pm

I wonder if Presonus will offer cash rewards for disproving this.

braj · Post by **braj** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:16 pm

I personally like this bit:

"I am happy to stake my reputation on that, and I know a lot of other people are happy to as well."

Yes, they are called 'employees'

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:18 pm

musikmachine wrote:I wonder if Presonus will offer cash rewards for disproving this.

no, but there is a guy who will charge you 99 bucks to take a test to tell you that that are they same. And if you find a difference, well.......you can't hear it anyways. I spent my 99 bucks on a plug in that sounded fine on any host I use it in.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:19 pm

braj wrote:I personally like this bit:

"I am happy to stake my reputation on that, and I know a lot of other people are happy to as well."

Yes, they are called 'employees'

koolkeys · Post by **koolkeys** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:45 pm

I'm a Studio One user, and I think this blog post is misguided. It's obvious that this guy(I don't know what his position is exactly) is very excited and hasn't done any scientific tests, and he is probably judging by placebo effect, or under the influence of pan law.

Regardless, I don't like these arguments, especially when the person posting it SHOULD know better. Now, Studio One DOES sound BEST. But it does not sound BETTER. Big difference.

It's unfortunate because Studio One has a LOT going for it, and it's a fantastic host that people are jumping to all the time. It's user base is growing and respect within the audio software world is growing. So there is no need to make these types of baseless arguments to try and sell it.

Brent

braj · Post by **braj** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:02 pm

But as other's are saying, maybe it doesn't sound best at all, maybe it is worst because it alters the original sound without consent, I don't know if this is the case but that would be pretty ironic.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:56 pm

But brent, this is kvr.

Coincidentally, some bozo spammed the reaper forum (including the all win troll poll!) and the Ibanez forums are just chock full o mucho spam.

Coincidence?

SJ_Digriz · Post by **SJ_Digriz** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:05 pm

koolkeys wrote:this guy(I don't know what his position is exactly) is very excited and hasn't done any scientific tests, and he is most likely under the influence.

fixed it.

fedexnman · Post by **fedexnman** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:10 pm

Too much bourbon and jambalya , I guess.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:35 pm

todd sweetland wrote:Too much bourbon and jambalya , I guess.

Best idea yet!

havran · Post by **havran** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:52 am

Perhaps the vowels had affected my hearing. Stevenson had mentioned this. The consonants would take care of themselves. The owl would come tonight -- of that I was certain -- but I was too excited, too apprehensive. If I did not sleep, the owl would not perch upon my sill.

blueman · Post by **blueman** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:52 am

Who cares about "sounds better"?

Reaper looks worse...I'm jus sayin

braj · Post by **braj** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:12 am

blueman wrote:Who cares about "sounds better"? Reaper looks worse...I'm jus sayin

Yes, that is what is truly important in music, how it looks!

Studio One sounds better, thanks to... It just does.