Musikmesse 2012: Propellerhead to share "exciting news"
-
- KVRAF
- 14116 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
Sometimes it's just as easy as changing the extension and making sure the computer knows what goes where.
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Can you comment on the issue of latency compensation and if/ how that is handled?
-
- KVRAF
- 13124 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
I would be really excited to see SilentWay as a Rack Extension.
Particularly if Os introduces an easier way to get CV from analog synths back into the DAW. It'd be really neat to be able to control analog synths from Reason* and to control Reason from my modular.
____
*I know that there is a way to do this currently, but it's not ideal and there is no way to calibrate voltages.
Particularly if Os introduces an easier way to get CV from analog synths back into the DAW. It'd be really neat to be able to control analog synths from Reason* and to control Reason from my modular.
____
*I know that there is a way to do this currently, but it's not ideal and there is no way to calibrate voltages.
-
- KVRist
- 229 posts since 22 Jul, 2011 from Stockholm, Sweden
Not just yet I'm afraid, this was an early tech demo after all, but it's not something we've overlooked.headquest wrote:Can you comment on the issue of latency compensation and if/ how that is handled?
-
- KVRian
- 1133 posts since 31 May, 2007
Great news...im not really sure what happens though when a new format comes out?...will developers make all their new plug ins RE or will they make all of their plug in range RE..i would love to see arturias jupiter 8 in reason
live 11 / Arturia collection / many Softube plug ins / thats it
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
This is not that different than what Ableton has done with AAS but on a vast scale. Live's Rack vs Reason's Rack more or less.
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
-
- KVRAF
- 2973 posts since 10 Sep, 2003 from Karlskoga, Stockholm, Sweden
It would have to be an MKS-80damoog wrote:Great news...im not really sure what happens though when a new format comes out?...will developers make all their new plug ins RE or will they make all of their plug in range RE..i would love to see arturias jupiter 8 in reason
--
I so very much hope for Dmitry (Diversion), Valhalla and SKNote to add their range to the rack.........................................
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10237 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
You still haven't answered my question..Anosou wrote:Not just yet I'm afraid, this was an early tech demo after all, but it's not something we've overlooked.headquest wrote:Can you comment on the issue of latency compensation and if/ how that is handled?
Also.. another thing I've thought is this could be super useful if the API had great documentation. VST has pretty crappy docs imo. Little to no aid in figuring how it all is supposed to work internally when designing plugins. If your API is clean and has tons of resources it could become something big. At the very least, a good way to get into Pro Audio development.
-
- KVRist
- 433 posts since 26 Sep, 2004
I second someones opinion about the sequencer. If Props wants this stuff to take off they need to update the sequencer. Maybe make some type of hybrid like Ableton. In the past I've had a lot of fun with Ableton+Reason, but its just easier to use other plugins.
If Props were to revamp the sequencers (+midi out), and keep the price reasonable, I would try it. But it really depends on the sequencer.
One effect that I completely fell in love with was the Scream4, if some how I could send audio into it from a Virus, that would be distortion heaven. I hope Virus makes a TI version for reason, that would be insane.
I am excited about the IPAD app, will definitely buy that.
If Props were to revamp the sequencers (+midi out), and keep the price reasonable, I would try it. But it really depends on the sequencer.
One effect that I completely fell in love with was the Scream4, if some how I could send audio into it from a Virus, that would be distortion heaven. I hope Virus makes a TI version for reason, that would be insane.
I am excited about the IPAD app, will definitely buy that.
-
- KVRist
- 229 posts since 22 Jul, 2011 from Stockholm, Sweden
Like I said, can't give details about latency compensation. It's still quite early, sorry!VitaminD wrote:You still haven't answered my question..Anosou wrote:Not just yet I'm afraid, this was an early tech demo after all, but it's not something we've overlooked.headquest wrote:Can you comment on the issue of latency compensation and if/ how that is handled?
Also.. another thing I've thought is this could be super useful if the API had great documentation. VST has pretty crappy docs imo. Little to no aid in figuring how it all is supposed to work internally when designing plugins. If your API is clean and has tons of resources it could become something big. At the very least, a good way to get into Pro Audio development.
Re: documentation I know that we have (or are working on) extensive documentation for developers working with Rack Extensions and I can only imagine this getting expanded.
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10237 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
My question wasn't on latency compensation but 'compensation' of another sort.Anosou wrote:Like I said, can't give details about latency compensation. It's still quite early, sorry!VitaminD wrote:You still haven't answered my question..Anosou wrote:Not just yet I'm afraid, this was an early tech demo after all, but it's not something we've overlooked.headquest wrote:Can you comment on the issue of latency compensation and if/ how that is handled?
Also.. another thing I've thought is this could be super useful if the API had great documentation. VST has pretty crappy docs imo. Little to no aid in figuring how it all is supposed to work internally when designing plugins. If your API is clean and has tons of resources it could become something big. At the very least, a good way to get into Pro Audio development.
Re: documentation I know that we have (or are working on) extensive documentation for developers working with Rack Extensions and I can only imagine this getting expanded.
The documentation aspect is appealing to me. Esp if you have some basic tutorials on setting up basic sound generators/effects.
-
- KVRist
- 229 posts since 22 Jul, 2011 from Stockholm, Sweden
Compensation as in crossgrades? Too early to comment I'm afraid but what I can say is that developer's set the price. We hear the feedback though, appreciate that.VitaminD wrote:My question wasn't on latency compensation but 'compensation' of another sort.Anosou wrote:Like I said, can't give details about latency compensation. It's still quite early, sorry!VitaminD wrote:You still haven't answered my question..Anosou wrote:Not just yet I'm afraid, this was an early tech demo after all, but it's not something we've overlooked.headquest wrote:Can you comment on the issue of latency compensation and if/ how that is handled?
Also.. another thing I've thought is this could be super useful if the API had great documentation. VST has pretty crappy docs imo. Little to no aid in figuring how it all is supposed to work internally when designing plugins. If your API is clean and has tons of resources it could become something big. At the very least, a good way to get into Pro Audio development.
Re: documentation I know that we have (or are working on) extensive documentation for developers working with Rack Extensions and I can only imagine this getting expanded.
The documentation aspect is appealing to me. Esp if you have some basic tutorials on setting up basic sound generators/effects.
-
- KVRAF
- 1980 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Back in the UK
