see Markus this is where I disagree with youMarkus from Tone2.com wrote:.......
With the above in mind I would also note in this specific case that it was not us who started the comparison with U-he products, it was someone who felt the need to quote Urs putting down the 0-delay filter technology, taken from another thread.
In my honest opinion it doesn't help if a developer posts inside a competitors thread to slowly fan the flames and post negative claims while steering the discussion towards his own products.
Call it courtesy among professionals but I feel that a product should stand on its own merits and users should be able to decide for themselves without a competitor telling them how they should feel.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 89#4839589
specifically :
I ask you, which other one 'has been discussed on kvr a while ago'?Q: Will Tone2 Saurus have those fancy 0-delay filters?
A: Yes. We completely redisigned the filters section and were able to create 6 filter types which support true analog modeling with a 0-delay algorithm, nonlinearity, feedback, self-osc, high-precision pitch tracking, low CPU, oversampling, very fast envelopes and aliasfree distortion.
It's a completely new approach to filter modeling which is not used by any other company or product so far. It's a different '0-delay modeling approach' than that one which has been discussed here on kvr a while ago. The main advantage is a much higher performance and a filter which is very precise with pitch tracking.
I don't buy that it wasn't Diva you were speaking of...
rsp

