Who is trolling here?Markus from Tone2.com wrote:It's always the same here on krv. Trolls, haters, lies & heavy emotions. That's why Tone2, refx and many other companies have moved away from here.
)True. The problem is that noone has the time and the mental capatcity to follow a huge theard like this one completely. Then things are taken out-of-context, quoted, the quote is quotes again. This results in a crippeled original content which leads to missunderstaning and a big arguement.mellotronaut wrote:Sampleconstruct wrote:Selective perception on all ends....
Even as a fanboy/troll I have to be honest and said I don't think this post was necessary here.chacka wrote:Who is trolling here?Markus from Tone2.com wrote:It's always the same here on krv. Trolls, haters, lies & heavy emotions. That's why Tone2, refx and many other companies have moved away from here.
Who is hating here?
Who is lying here?
Heavy emotions, yes.
Korg Polysix sounds great. Still great. I don't think Saurus is a serious challenger to;FrantzM wrote:I don't think Saurus is a serious challenger to DIVA in the "analog" race and I can't run DIVA on my slow PC. So I am stuck with Creamware hardware synths and the Korg Polysix VST for my "analog" sounds.
This is why everybody praises you for your objective and sober advertisement.Markus from Tone2.com wrote:Call it courtesy among professionals but I feel that a product should stand on its own merits and users should be able to decide for themselves without a competitor telling them how they should feel.
Markus from Tone2.com wrote: we never compared Saurus against DIVA.
Yes. The Korg Monotron is indeed a very nice toy. I bought one to get a feeling for the MS20 Filter and as inspiration for the 12dB lowpass in Saurus.zerocrossing wrote:Anyway, take any one of them, throw Warmverb on it and I feel you'll have a better more "analog" sounding synth than Saurus... but, in the end the Korg Monotron beats them all and is $50 cheaper than Saurus.
There, no need to thank me, I fixed it for you.pdxindy wrote:Markus from Tone2.com wrote: we never compared Saurus against DIVA.
Your original FAQ absolutely compared Saurus to Diva, in my opinion. Personally I didn't see it as a problem.
I would suggest that the Mac bug that prevents the user from changing osc waveforms (etc) by clicking on the led should be considered serious enough to fix pronto...Markus from Tone2.com wrote:
Saurus has been reported as stable in all known hosts. So far no serious bugs or problems have been reported. That's why i expect that an update to v1.1 will not be necessary very soon.
Initially i planed to extend the demo to 30 minutes with the v1.1 release. But now i think that it might be available earlier. Maybe after the release of AkustiX v.1.1 wich will include a 64 bit mac version.
Sorry the shit came all from your side. And I hope it will come back from where came from in big abundance.chacka wrote:This happens when shit hits the fan. It comes ..... back.MaxSynths wrote:Once you said that you don't like Saurus for the X or Y reason you have expressed your opinion. But when the thing turns into a persecusion with people (which casually belongs to the same "clan") pointing the finger to almost everything to highlight negative aspects of a new product which is potentially dangerous for the company they are linked to... well in this case the whole thing is really suspect, isn't it??
You know, I din't even start to talk about what I think of Saurus. And yet you throw everybody into the big fanboi, clan, persecution, etc. corner and think you are doing right?
I only do beta test and sound design for Tone2 but I don't get a salary from them (but I get paid for sound design, but then again I don't make a living out of it, so I don't have any real economic interest out of this discussion. What about you?chacka wrote:Are you the competitor you're talking about? Are you affiliated? I work for U-He and my signature says that clearly. What about you?MaxSynths wrote:What I'm saying is that everyone can express is opinion, but the dirty game that has been done here is squalid. It's not about express an opinion; here the aim is to talk bad about a competitor.
). In any case, also if I weren't in some way linked with Tone2, my criticism about your method would be the same.Well, what a wonderful attitude. I'm sure that's going to win and retain many customers for you. As a side note, I only posted in this thread in the last few pages due to what I saw to be unfair comments telling someone to stop posting in a public forum and defend their products, and a few posts later, you're insulting an entire customer base.MaxSynths wrote:I'm not hijacking the thread to advertise my products though!KBSoundSmith wrote:Why not do the same. After all, this thread isn't about your products either.MaxSynths wrote:Yes very easy: keep away! And think to your business!Urs wrote:Can you now please keep me out if this?
I'm here (or I would like to be here...) to discuss about Saurus.
Yes, feel free to consider it an insult. I have no fear to say what I think and the behaviour of some people in this thread, and their words confirm what they really are.when you've been the one calling paying customers henchman. I'm sure I'm not the only one to find that insulting.
I couldn't agree moreLeVzi wrote:There, no need to thank me, I'm an ass and I misquoted it for you.pdxindy wrote:Markus from Tone2.com wrote: we never compared Saurus against DIVA.
Your original FAQ absolutely compared Saurus to Diva, in my opinion. Personally I didn't see it as a problem.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
