no its not "pro's" around the world use whatever they think is best shit i have seen reaper in a few really nice studiosluckystrike wrote:How about getting Mac and Locig? It is da most 'professionaaal' daw in the world.
Should I change DAW?
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
honestly i don't like FL but my friend uses it and makes dope stuff out of it its all on what you use and how you use it. If its quick easy for you and sounds good why change a good thing. 
-
- KVRAF
- 5576 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
hibidy wrote:BUY ALL THE CATS!
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I both love all the hosts and hate all the hosts (seriously) Despite all the joking, they DO get in the way allot because there is always some stupid little thing that get's in the way.
-
- KVRAF
- 16977 posts since 23 Jun, 2010 from north of London ON
And the cats.....liquidsound wrote:What about the cats!hibidy wrote:
you are supposed to go through ALL THE HOSTS and then blame your tools for you not being able to make music!!!!!! Buy them now!
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
-
- KVRAF
- 5576 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
Damn! I'm sneezing!ABEFLGMOPPRRST
-
Guido Negraszus Guido Negraszus https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=234755
- KVRist
- 132 posts since 29 Jun, 2010 from Busselton, West Australia
There is no such thing as "professional" DAW anymore. Most of current DAW's are great tools for pretty much anything you want to do. Hans Zimmer (film composer) uses Cubase, Enigma (Michael Cretu) uses Logic, Mike Oldfield uses FL studio among others and the list goes on. They all made millions of $. You use what best suits you. I used to work completely on a Akai MPC60 / MPC3000 (1990's), then Logic, Cubase and now I am very happy with Studio One. They all worked for me, they all did the job. Good luck with everything!
DAW: Studio One 4.5.3 Professional, Win7 x64, i7 5930K @ 3.5Ghz, VE PRO
Audio: RME ADI-2 PRO, Presonus Studio 1824
Midi: Studiologic Numa Compact, Faderport, S1 RC,
Sounds: Omnisphere, Zebra, Komplete12U, Lexicon, Fabfilter, Soundtoys, Breeze, Waves
Audio: RME ADI-2 PRO, Presonus Studio 1824
Midi: Studiologic Numa Compact, Faderport, S1 RC,
Sounds: Omnisphere, Zebra, Komplete12U, Lexicon, Fabfilter, Soundtoys, Breeze, Waves
-
- KVRist
- 87 posts since 7 Jan, 2005
Do not change your DAW! Otherwise you'll begin to think about DAWs and not about making music. Many successful musicians don't even upgrade their DAW if it works for them.
The fact that people at the studio didn't recognize a FL Studio character is the main proof that you can get professional results from it. I would be troubled if, immediately after hearing the beat, They would have told you: "well, it's done in FL"!
The fact that people at the studio didn't recognize a FL Studio character is the main proof that you can get professional results from it. I would be troubled if, immediately after hearing the beat, They would have told you: "well, it's done in FL"!
-
- KVRist
- 154 posts since 10 Apr, 2011
I don't think there's a difference in sound between the DAWs. It's important that you feel comfortable with it and it supports your workflow, and offers the features you need. The most important is still what you do with a tool. A good producer could record a world hit with any DAW I'm sure