Hey Urs,Urs wrote:The IC is one thing... levels and circuitry around it is another. Juno 6/60 can self oscillate, JP-8 not. They do sound distinctively different.filter303 wrote:From what I've heard it uses the same IR3109 filter IC as JP8..olikana wrote: btw why no juno6/60 filter?? is it not the best filter ever made? ;P i think yes!
Just saying..
Also, JP-8 had two major revisions. I've been told the earlier one uses different opAmps, maybe even a different structure.
Yes there are some differences between the two circuits, mainly the input gains, and the resonance compensation, but since I have adjustable input drive, and I normalise the signal so there is no droop in the passband (edit: when resonance is increased) the circuits are pretty much the same from my point of view.
I have also matched the resonance ranges of all the filters so the end user can switch between the circuits and listen to the tonal differences as I feel this is more practical than slavishly modelling the exact characteristics of the original. I also have also modified the resonance feedback saturation and droop compensation in the JP8/Juno6 model since again I am interested in a useful range of resonance for mixing applications. For all these reasons simply calling the filters by their general name is an attractive option, so for the JP8/Juno6 filter is really should be: Cascade core=OTA BA662 res=OTA BA662, but I think just Cascade will have to do.
