This explains why I no longer own my DX7 or TX7 but still own FM7/FM8/FM Heaven..........K-Bee wrote:You can't match the DX7. You need the crappy digital converters and some digital grit. You can't emulate a flaw!Teksonik wrote:I've owned a DX7 and I think FM Heaven comes closest to any vsti I've tried but it's still not a 100% match.![]()
Best FM vsti can load Yamha dx7 sysex
- KVRAF
- 19801 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRAF
- 14126 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
I think it's an unfair comparison because I don't think sysex data includes effects, which I'm sure the DX7 used extensively. Load a preset into FM8 & play around with the effects and I'm sure you'll get some ear-catching sounds.
-
- KVRist
- 466 posts since 31 Jan, 2010
I have/had all of this (all soft, DX7mkI, DX7mkII, DX200, plus SY77)
The best way of converting is: FM7 first, then FM7 to FM8.
What's the trick? Simple: FM8 has some bugs in sysex convertion, but it reads FM7 without any problem (100% accurate).
Anyway, you must be aware that most of the DX7 patches sound old, and you will probably need to tweak them further. DX7II/TX802 or DX200 can have much more "modern" patches.
After conversion, you should slightly lower the LFOs speed in FM8 (it must be done manually).
The final result: virtualy no difference, with FM8 sounding a little better than hardware. Amazing VSTi. Nothing can compare with it.
Hexter is another story: it had potential and character, but it still misses all DX7 parameters, so the convertion is far away from the original. Still, it makes "his own" sounds, full of undescribable, FMish character. Too bad its development stopped.
The best way of converting is: FM7 first, then FM7 to FM8.
What's the trick? Simple: FM8 has some bugs in sysex convertion, but it reads FM7 without any problem (100% accurate).
Anyway, you must be aware that most of the DX7 patches sound old, and you will probably need to tweak them further. DX7II/TX802 or DX200 can have much more "modern" patches.
After conversion, you should slightly lower the LFOs speed in FM8 (it must be done manually).
The final result: virtualy no difference, with FM8 sounding a little better than hardware. Amazing VSTi. Nothing can compare with it.
Hexter is another story: it had potential and character, but it still misses all DX7 parameters, so the convertion is far away from the original. Still, it makes "his own" sounds, full of undescribable, FMish character. Too bad its development stopped.
- something special
- 8627 posts since 16 Mar, 2002 from Birmingham, Alabama
Did later versions of DX7 have built-in fx? I know my mk1 doesn't; and I was really sort of disappointed when I got it home from and it didn't sound like in the store (they'd added fx, obviously).osiris wrote:I think it's an unfair comparison because I don't think sysex data includes effects, which I'm sure the DX7 used extensively. Load a preset into FM8 & play around with the effects and I'm sure you'll get some ear-catching sounds.
-
- KVRAF
- 5139 posts since 27 Jun, 2004
Funny. I know all of them, so I know that 1. there is a huge difference (between all those hardware units as well), and 2. FM7/FM8 sounds like crap compared to all of them.zorniko wrote:I have/had all of this (all soft, DX7mkI, DX7mkII, DX200, plus SY77)
The final result: virtualy no difference, with FM8 sounding a little better than hardware. Amazing VSTi. Nothing can compare with it.
"Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi
-
- KVRAF
- 1703 posts since 19 Apr, 2003 from Copenhagen, Denmark
DX7 had no FX sectionosiris wrote:I think it's an unfair comparison because I don't think sysex data includes effects, which I'm sure the DX7 used extensively. Load a preset into FM8 & play around with the effects and I'm sure you'll get some ear-catching sounds.
___The Jepptunes___
"Accept All the Good"
Sound design for SQ8L and Alchemy
"Accept All the Good"
Sound design for SQ8L and Alchemy
- KVRAF
- 14126 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
You're correct. For dome strange reason I thought Roland made them, and assumed it had fx. 
- KVRAF
- 2083 posts since 28 Feb, 2011
This is a very informative post. I've heard from other people who own all of them that FM7 sounded more like the hardware than FM8, but until now I didn't know why. Of course, even the MKII has a lot lower S/N ratio (noisier) than the software synths, and the DX7 is much worse still, something that's easy to take for granted today. But I have to say, I'm lovin' my new TX-802. It sounds amazing with flange and reverb, especially if like me you're interested in the "Miami" sound.zorniko wrote:I have/had all of this (all soft, DX7mkI, DX7mkII, DX200, plus SY77)
The best way of converting is: FM7 first, then FM7 to FM8.
What's the trick? Simple: FM8 has some bugs in sysex convertion, but it reads FM7 without any problem (100% accurate).
Anyway, you must be aware that most of the DX7 patches sound old, and you will probably need to tweak them further. DX7II/TX802 or DX200 can have much more "modern" patches.
After conversion, you should slightly lower the LFOs speed in FM8 (it must be done manually).
The final result: virtualy no difference, with FM8 sounding a little better than hardware. Amazing VSTi. Nothing can compare with it.
Hexter is another story: it had potential and character, but it still misses all DX7 parameters, so the convertion is far away from the original. Still, it makes "his own" sounds, full of undescribable, FMish character. Too bad its development stopped.
-
- KVRAF
- 10260 posts since 19 Feb, 2004 from Paris
Agree with most of that. I still have many HW Yam FM synths.zorniko wrote:I have/had all of this (all soft, DX7mkI, DX7mkII, DX200, plus SY77)
The best way of converting is: FM7 first, then FM7 to FM8.
What's the trick? Simple: FM8 has some bugs in sysex convertion, but it reads FM7 without any problem (100% accurate).
Anyway, you must be aware that most of the DX7 patches sound old, and you will probably need to tweak them further. DX7II/TX802 or DX200 can have much more "modern" patches.
After conversion, you should slightly lower the LFOs speed in FM8 (it must be done manually).
The final result: virtualy no difference, with FM8 sounding a little better than hardware. Amazing VSTi. Nothing can compare with it.
Hexter is another story: it had potential and character, but it still misses all DX7 parameters, so the convertion is far away from the original. Still, it makes "his own" sounds, full of undescribable, FMish character. Too bad its development stopped.
Fm7 has the best conversion. By far. And sounds the closest to the original Yam synths.
Some other FM synths are also great. I like a lot Sytrus for example though with its tiny GUI its an absolute pain in the a.. to program. Rhino has its own strenghts too, with Hyvrid synthesis and sample import etc. Or Phantom, Hexter, Toxic etc.
But if you go for the Legacy sounds, and sysex import FM7/8 are the closest.
The only thing I will slightly disagree with is that they would sound better than the HW versions. A bit different imho. And the average DAC are probaly no strangers to that. As well as additonal factors.
LtZ
http://www.lelotusbleu.fr Synth Presets
77 Exclusive Soundbanks for 23 synths, 8 Sound Designers, Hours of audio Demos. The Sound you miss might be there
77 Exclusive Soundbanks for 23 synths, 8 Sound Designers, Hours of audio Demos. The Sound you miss might be there
- KVRAF
- 2248 posts since 10 Apr, 2002 from Saint Germain en Laye, France
-
- KVRAF
- 5632 posts since 18 Jul, 2002
Not exactly DX7 but Phantom can load Yamaha DX100, DX27 and DX21 SysEx.
http://www.discodsp.com/phantom/
http://www.discodsp.com/phantom/
- KVRAF
- 6504 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
carrieres wrote:exactly the informations i was looking for ! kvr can be great sometime
+1
-
- KVRAF
- 1676 posts since 17 Dec, 2002 from Yorkshire

