Is FL10 the most popular DAW used by Trance Producers ?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

liquidsound wrote:Reaper is getting closer to be like a castle of cards.... Keep adding cards to customize the hell out of it.
One day will collapse under its own weight. :shock: :scared:
Strange, it still feels light and lightning fast, even on my soon to be outdated MBP.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth

Post

spaceman wrote:
liquidsound wrote:Reaper is getting closer to be like a castle of cards.... Keep adding cards to customize the hell out of it.
One day will collapse under its own weight. :shock: :scared:
Strange, it still feels light and lightning fast, even on my soon to be outdated MBP.
Yea!
A Castle of card is light as well.
Seriously, I'm not a reaper power user but too much flexibility gets you joint overextend and loose power even though you can perform many postures. I experienced not only efficiency but also effectiveness when I moved to DAW such as MuLab and Studio One. No much customization, but an amazing inviting unobstructive workflow.
In fact with these two DAW I was not able to bring "my perfect Workflow", "perfect DAW" "Disease" to take over the object of making music.
But again... This is MHO... :)
ABEFLGMOPPRRST :phones:

Post

I hate reaper.

Post

hibidy wrote:I hate reaper.
:o :-o :?
ABEFLGMOPPRRST :phones:

Post

A Warez kiddie who uses cracked buggy Cubase and ask.com search engine.
Image


Trancesssssssssss makesss me want to dancesssss.

Image

Post

i would say yes

Post

Do you know what you have to do in FL Studio to automate CC1? (mod wheel) It´s insane ... while most of the daws you can write CC1 automatically. FL Studio did not evolve completelly in a profesional manner in so many aspects that make it more a daw-toy or beginner tool than Cubase, Reaper or Logic.

Post

hahahaha :roll:

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”