KVR Audio

Ah_Dziz · Post by **Ah_Dziz** » Tue May 22, 2012 2:26 am

If I owned a Mac I would buy a copy of Logic just because of it's insanely low price despite being a loyal cubase user since VST 32. The bundled plugins with logic have always been way ahead of the curve and you can do some really nifty stuff with their "environment" setup. I still probably wouldn't switch but it would be fun to have around. I bought Reaper for the same reason. Sometimes it's fun to switch it up for a couple of sessions. Also my reaper license has been extremely handy on a couple of location gigs when I left my handy syncrosoft key at home.

careyletendre · Post by **careyletendre** » Tue May 22, 2012 2:47 am

phazedown wrote:The i7 Windows notebook I configured for 899€ turned out to be 2300€ as Mac version with exactly the same specs. The price factor is 2,57x

They are not even close to being made the same. Quality of construction favours apple.

phazedown wrote:Don't want to start a Mac vs. Win discussion.
But even if Logic is "the best DAW", I find the Mac price tag ridiculous.

In what way are you not starting a MAc vs PC discussion.

Carey

careyletendre · Post by **careyletendre** » Tue May 22, 2012 2:48 am

careyletendre wrote:
phazedown wrote:The i7 Windows notebook I configured for 899€ turned out to be 2300€ as Mac version with exactly the same specs. The price factor is 2,57x
They are not even close to being made the same. Quality of construction favours apple. Price point favours PC.

phazedown wrote:Don't want to start a Mac vs. Win discussion.
But even if Logic is "the best DAW", I find the Mac price tag ridiculous.

In what way are you not starting a MAc vs PC discussion?

Carey

mcnoone · Post by **mcnoone** » Tue May 22, 2012 3:07 am

I don't like logic.
It interferes too much with imagination.
Logic is also based on assumptions anyway, so what's the difference.
There are no rascally rabbits in wonderland, in logic either.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Tue May 22, 2012 3:51 am

I see we have yet another episod of "FAIL".

LawrenceF · Post by **LawrenceF** » Tue May 22, 2012 3:57 am

hibidy wrote:I see we have yet another episod of "FAIL".

Vote "fish".

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Tue May 22, 2012 3:59 am

LawrenceF · Post by **LawrenceF** » Tue May 22, 2012 4:03 am

"We are adding some new features and improvements to the software that we didn't originally plan for the 1.0 release and the public beta has been delayed longer than we originally planned because of this. Thanks for being patient! We're working as hard as we can to get the beta out as soon as we can!"

Keep hope alive!

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Tue May 22, 2012 4:05 am

Yeah, but you got your copy

luckystrike · Post by **luckystrike** » Tue May 22, 2012 4:31 am

CT wrote:Yea, Im sure that all iMacs don't have problems. But my research on the internet, and various discussions with Apple or retailer employees have clearly shown that a large number of aluminium iMacs do/did have problems with their screens. I dont know if the percentage is higher than it should be, but it certainly seems like it is .. a lot higher.

Yes, I tried to mention this but this is musician's forum so I thought it wouldn't matter for them. iMac's displays have unacceptable yellow tint for its price tag, many people have claimed and get replaced but didn't work. That's why it isn't welcomed by photographers. By the way, these people are using Eizo's displays. I hope this post doesn't have any obvious provocations.

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Tue May 22, 2012 12:21 pm

luckystrike wrote:
CT wrote:Yea, Im sure that all iMacs don't have problems. But my research on the internet, and various discussions with Apple or retailer employees have clearly shown that a large number of aluminium iMacs do/did have problems with their screens. I dont know if the percentage is higher than it should be, but it certainly seems like it is .. a lot higher.
Yes, I tried to mention this but this is musician's forum so I thought it wouldn't matter for them. iMac's displays have unacceptable yellow tint for its price tag, many people have claimed and get replaced but didn't work. That's why it isn't welcomed by photographers. By the way, these people are using Eizo's displays. I hope this post doesn't have any obvious provocations.

It's unrelated to the thread topic, and in a disruptive way. Stay on topic, and maybe read the rules you're required to follow and the What is KVR? page. In particular, note this part:

Ben, the guy who runs this place wrote:What isn't KVR?

There are many things that KVR isn't but in particular the following aren't welcome:

KVR isn't a place for obtaining or discussing warez, cracks, porn, politics, etc.
Flames/Stupid arguments.
Elite-ness/Egos/One-upmanship/Penis comparison/Parent fights/etc.
Format wars (Please…)/Host wars (Come on, try now…)/Platform wars (Leave it Darren, it's not worth it…).
KVR isn't a free for all democracy where you can say what you like about who you like, respect one another and they will respect you.

trimph1 · Post by **trimph1** » Tue May 22, 2012 12:35 pm

Oh goody....

Can we actually think difference without hierarchy here?

Try to imagine that possibility to think OTHER than hierarchy..it can be done you know.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Tue May 22, 2012 12:48 pm

trimph1 wrote:Oh goody....

Can we actually think difference without hierarchy here?

Try to imagine that possibility to think OTHER than hierarchy..it can be done you know.

my differences are better than yours.

Arglebargle · Post by **Arglebargle** » Tue May 22, 2012 12:49 pm

I'd like to try Logic, but there's no demo, right?

george · Post by **george** » Tue May 22, 2012 12:59 pm

No demo, but YouTube should be enough.

All "pros" moving over to Logic, why?