Definitelykbaccki wrote:Agreed. I was only responding to some of the earlier (somewhat generic) posts comparing performance of Reaper vs. Cubase, etc. In terms of straight performance (i.e., not apples-to-apples "audio engine" tests) Reaper does have the clever lookahead processing, which should ease up on the CPU compared to a DAW that doesn't precompute. Basic audio engine handling of VST/VSTi/threading/etc. will also affect performance, of course. I think what we've discovered here is that Reaper + OP-X Pro II = WINNING COMBINATION!Peter999 wrote:I completely agree. This btw was not thought as a DAW shootout, just as a general performance test that can be repeated in the own system.
