Best short mixing tips
-
- KVRist
- 77 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Europe
Totally agree.GFunk wrote:Compression 1st, then eq.
Compressors have a bad habit of shaving some frequencies off.
By the way, does anyone know how an EQ works?
How does it for example take 3dB off at 3000 Hz?
You might be surprised to know.
- KVRAF
- 3846 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from Underworld
Actually, EQ *before* compressing have its advantages, too. I wouldn't call it the "law" to put an EQ after the compressor at all. I actually do more of EQ before the compressor. It depends on what you're trying to achieve. EQ before compressor works almost like an exciter since the frequencies you boost get evened a bit by the compressor. It's a rather interesting effect. 
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Jiddu Krishnamurti
-
- KVRian
- 921 posts since 14 May, 2010 from Atlanta, GA
Monitor low!
And DuX makes a good point, if you have instruments or vocalists that get a little harsh or edgy as they get louder, a tube-type compressor will take the edge off very nicely!
So 2nd tip: Never say never!
KVR/eSoundz: Xenobt
And DuX makes a good point, if you have instruments or vocalists that get a little harsh or edgy as they get louder, a tube-type compressor will take the edge off very nicely!
So 2nd tip: Never say never!
KVR/eSoundz: Xenobt
-
- KVRAF
- 7579 posts since 17 Feb, 2005
Yeah but it also lowers everything else in relation. It works well on some material, to excite.DuX wrote:Actually, EQ *before* compressing have its advantages, too. I wouldn't call it the "law" to put an EQ after the compressor at all. I actually do more of EQ before the compressor. It depends on what you're trying to achieve. EQ before compressor works almost like an exciter since the frequencies you boost get evened a bit by the compressor. It's a rather interesting effect.
I use EQ pre-compressor on the master to give a little selectivity to the range of interest, and then post-compressor to bring out the final balance. It's redundant but I think it makes highs breathe better.
-
- KVRist
- 210 posts since 29 Jun, 2012 from Leeds, UK
Alright I didn't say you should never do it but the topic is "short mix tips" so I kept the statement short. I personally find it more beneficial on the whole to eq after compression otherwise the resulting sound can end up boxy with not enough lows or highs.DuX wrote:Actually, EQ *before* compressing have its advantages, too. I wouldn't call it the "law" to put an EQ after the compressor at all. I actually do more of EQ before the compressor. It depends on what you're trying to achieve. EQ before compressor works almost like an exciter since the frequencies you boost get evened a bit by the compressor. It's a rather interesting effect.
Your comment is a worth while point but I would still follow this process with an eq after.
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 616 posts since 18 Dec, 2010
In regards to EQ Before/ after compression, i find it is best to sometimes do both, mostly when i am EQ'ing it is cutting, so i find it more beneficial to cut with an EQ before the compressor, that way you have removed the frequencies you don't want and you can even out the frequencies you do want
But if you are EQ'ing say with a nice analogue modelled compressor for some 'air' or even a boost on your vocals, i would almost always do that after the compressor, because then it is like you have evened the sound to as you want it, then the final EQ can not be harmed by the compressor and you will probably not need to EQ as much
+1 mixing at low volume, most of my mixing is around 65db no higher - sometimes i crank it up at the end to hear how it is sounding, things really do sound better when they are louder, i could sit there for 2 minutes throw a kick, clap and any synth together and at 100db it would probably sound great, bring it down to 70db and it would sound bad, if you can get something sounding 'big' or good or whatever at 60/70db then you know that it is going to sound extremely good at 100db
But if you are EQ'ing say with a nice analogue modelled compressor for some 'air' or even a boost on your vocals, i would almost always do that after the compressor, because then it is like you have evened the sound to as you want it, then the final EQ can not be harmed by the compressor and you will probably not need to EQ as much
+1 mixing at low volume, most of my mixing is around 65db no higher - sometimes i crank it up at the end to hear how it is sounding, things really do sound better when they are louder, i could sit there for 2 minutes throw a kick, clap and any synth together and at 100db it would probably sound great, bring it down to 70db and it would sound bad, if you can get something sounding 'big' or good or whatever at 60/70db then you know that it is going to sound extremely good at 100db
Anybody can do anything if they set their mind to it
-
- KVRAF
- 1666 posts since 28 Jun, 2007 from Amazon rain forest
-
- KVRist
- 77 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Europe
I hope you have or that you will have, many children.Doug1978(tempID) wrote:Always make love when doing the final mix.
You will have to be a very talented person to be able to split your concentration on both "jobs" at the same time.
Bill Clinton had a "hard" time doing it
-
- KVRist
- 76 posts since 6 Jan, 2008 from the Netherlands
A simple thing which hasn't been mentioned...Your ears are always a 'morning person', they are most sensitive earlier on. The later it becomes in the day the more you'll be tempted to turn in more high throwing your mix off balance.
