New limiter plugin - VladG Limiter6
- KVRAF
- 2258 posts since 25 Jun, 2008 from Montreal, Canada
Thanks!
- KVRist
- 183 posts since 15 Jul, 2009 from Russia
Limiter No6 64-bit Mac VST version preview
I successfully built 32/64-bit (universal binary) VST version of Limiter No6 for Mac OS X. I didn't test it a lot and also I have suspicion it has problems with RTAS wrapper (didn't check it yet) but if you want it you can check this version for your own risk.
After the moment I can call this version "stable" I'll update links on "downloads" page.
I successfully built 32/64-bit (universal binary) VST version of Limiter No6 for Mac OS X. I didn't test it a lot and also I have suspicion it has problems with RTAS wrapper (didn't check it yet) but if you want it you can check this version for your own risk.
After the moment I can call this version "stable" I'll update links on "downloads" page.
Vlad from Tokyo Dawn Labs
- KVRAF
- 2930 posts since 29 May, 2009 from New Zealand
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
I notice that the two different skins sound slightly different but so far from what I have used its the best limiter I have found as far as nice smooth dynamic limiting with ISP detection I plan on donating when I get my next paycheck 
- KVRAF
- 2324 posts since 22 Aug, 2006
it still exhibits the CPU problem with Sonar X1. It consumes CPU even when I bypass it.vladg wrote:Thanks! I'll check it soon.satYatunes wrote:I know it's in alpha stage now. Just posting it as FYI. I just tried it with Sonar X1D and it seems to be taking too much CPU. Interestingly, in bypass mode also it uses a bit of CPU. (...)
satYatunes.com
Discover free skins, themes, plugins, deals and soundsets. Sell and promote your product.
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram for latest updates.
Discover free skins, themes, plugins, deals and soundsets. Sell and promote your product.
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram for latest updates.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
what do you use to check I use toneboosters meter thingy and It works for me make sure you use the last limiter in the highest quality mode I set my output to -.4 and hit at max about-.3ttoz wrote:it's an amazing freebie, best in breed for sure, but the isp feature does not work according to my metering software
Last edited by jam92189 on Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRist
- 183 posts since 15 Jul, 2009 from Russia
What metering software do you use? I checked it with K-Meter plugin once and I found that K-meter sometimes is wrong.ttoz wrote:it's an amazing freebie, best in breed for sure, but the isp feature does not work according to my metering software
I'm preparing 1.0.1 version, which can solve this problem.satYatunes wrote:it still exhibits the CPU problem with Sonar X1. It consumes CPU even when I bypass it.vladg wrote:Thanks! I'll check it soon.satYatunes wrote:I know it's in alpha stage now. Just posting it as FYI. I just tried it with Sonar X1D and it seems to be taking too much CPU. Interestingly, in bypass mode also it uses a bit of CPU. (...)
Yes, you're right. My ISP limiting algorithm has about 2% error (so peaks can overshoot theoretically no more than by 0.175 dB if threshold set to zero).jam92189 wrote:what do you use to check I use toneboosters and It works for me make sure you use the last limiter in the highest quality mode I set my output to -.4 and hit at max about-.3ttoz wrote:it's an amazing freebie, best in breed for sure, but the isp feature does not work according to my metering software
Vlad from Tokyo Dawn Labs
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
I watched it for quite some time when I first got it because I wanted to make sure it was working right. as far as I have seen its great at catching ISP but like vladg said a super super small peak might slip so if you really are going for 0 go for-.1 or -.2 I like it at -.4 its safe loud and a nice even number 
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
do you have it set to ISP precise?
- KVRist
- 183 posts since 15 Jul, 2009 from Russia
Damn! This is not good. Can you make sound sample (1 sec of length is enough) for me to reproduce it?ttoz wrote:with a ceiling of -0.3 with isp protection on the toneboosters, k meter, tc loudness meter and waves all picked tru peaks above 0![]()
On my turn, I've found in my archives small example to check true peak meter (~700k):
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18475891/k_meter_bug.wav
Can you check it with your metering software? I believe that this small sample doesn't have peaks upper than -0.3 dBFS.
Vlad from Tokyo Dawn Labs
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 676 posts since 24 May, 2011 from los angeles
I have a question about the different models I dont know if you answered this or not. did you make both of em sound different on purpose?
I just noticed from the start of using em that they had there own sound and each I find great for stuff.
I just noticed from the start of using em that they had there own sound and each I find great for stuff.
