Awesome.mrdr wrote:
Are you pissed off at Reason?
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
I felt so embarrassed for him that I had to close the window before the video finished.chk071 wrote:Awesome.mrdr wrote:Guess they had to react on Steve Jobs somehow.
-
- KVRAF
- 35713 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
"Mental illness vs American rugged individualism. There's a very thin line separating the two.
Steve Ballmer has crossed the line.
papalolita 3 weeks ago"
That completely made my day now...
Steve Ballmer has crossed the line.
papalolita 3 weeks ago"
That completely made my day now...
-
- KVRist
- 203 posts since 13 Aug, 2003
Saw that one, too. Brilliantchk071 wrote:"Mental illness vs American rugged individualism. There's a very thin line separating the two.
Steve Ballmer has crossed the line.
papalolita 3 weeks ago"
That completely made my day now...
- KVRist
- 470 posts since 11 Mar, 2007 from Portugal
I need 3 more posts to become er... uh... something I'm not currently at KVR Forum (the auto-admin link disabling thing)
So, this thread is a good bait as any other to allow me some useless posting
(hey, if others can do it, why can't I)
aaaanyway, here it goes:
Q2) Do you even know how much of what you said is true or false?
Q3) You do agree that developers can think for themselves, do their own math and estimates and decide if it's in their own interest to support Rack Extensions just like they have today to decide if they should support DX, MAS, RTAS, AAX, VST2.4, VST3, AU, 32bit/64bit, etc... right?
Q4) What if... Rack Extensions is a better format? Better documented, easier to develop to, more robust, less likely to allow critical bugs'n'issues and more future-proof than what's currently available ? (just saying)
Q5) What if... It's more developer-friendly? Have you tried asking every Rack Extension developer why did they jumped into the bandwagon? Maybe it even allows newer developers (those that don't have custom-made frameworks already developed) to draft new DSP ideas that can quickly be deployed to Reason users.
...and that's about it
3 down, 2 to go!
So, this thread is a good bait as any other to allow me some useless posting
aaaanyway, here it goes:
Q1) Are you a developer?zerocrossing wrote:it's obviously draining developer time that could be spent on fixing existing bugs and adding functionality to existing VSTs or creating totally new ones.
Q2) Do you even know how much of what you said is true or false?
Q3) You do agree that developers can think for themselves, do their own math and estimates and decide if it's in their own interest to support Rack Extensions just like they have today to decide if they should support DX, MAS, RTAS, AAX, VST2.4, VST3, AU, 32bit/64bit, etc... right?
Q4) What if... Rack Extensions is a better format? Better documented, easier to develop to, more robust, less likely to allow critical bugs'n'issues and more future-proof than what's currently available ? (just saying)
Q5) What if... It's more developer-friendly? Have you tried asking every Rack Extension developer why did they jumped into the bandwagon? Maybe it even allows newer developers (those that don't have custom-made frameworks already developed) to draft new DSP ideas that can quickly be deployed to Reason users.
...and that's about it
3 down, 2 to go!
-
- KVRist
- 203 posts since 13 Aug, 2003
Have some bad news for you. There is no use for logic in this thread. But you probably already noticed it. 
It's all about passion
It's all about passion
Last edited by mrdr on Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRist
- 470 posts since 11 Mar, 2007 from Portugal
I did, but thank you so much for the warning. Always welcomemrdr wrote:Have some bad news for you. There is no use for logic in this thread. But you probably already noticed it.
-
- KVRian
- 547 posts since 7 Mar, 2011
Thanks for the links.samplemania wrote:Propellerheads CEO at an entrepreneur meeting tat has been recorded (marketshare).
Sonic Charge on twitter (Re sales).
So Propellerhead is #2 in the U.S. I wonder how the European/Worldwide sales figures are? - If they were #2 worldwide, he probably would have said so, no?
It seems that Audiodamage is also doing ok according to the sonic charge twitter link. Chris mentioned earlier on the Prop forum that there was a 45 day turnaround to get paid for RE sales, and we're not at the 45 day mark yet, so Propellerhead is giving them all the sales data already. I wonder how much of rough rider sales came after the 35% drop in price?
-
- Banned
- 432 posts since 12 Apr, 2012
of course, being the thread "are you pissed off at reason" the obvious answers will be only "yes" and "no". NO is for fanboys or newbie enthusiasts, YES is for the ones who have played this software with passion in the past. There are no alternatives, i doubt one who does not care at all about reason will waste his time reading the posts or answering... 
-
- Banned
- 432 posts since 12 Apr, 2012
wait, you really believe that, in the U.S. software like, for instance, apple logic and garageband are less famous and used than reason...festeringheap wrote:Thanks for the links.samplemania wrote:Propellerheads CEO at an entrepreneur meeting tat has been recorded (marketshare).
Sonic Charge on twitter (Re sales).![]()
So Propellerhead is #2 in the U.S. I wonder how the European/Worldwide sales figures are? - If they were #2 worldwide, he probably would have said so, no?
It seems that Audiodamage is also doing ok according to the sonic charge twitter link. Chris mentioned earlier on the Prop forum that there was a 45 day turnaround to get paid for RE sales, and we're not at the 45 day mark yet, so Propellerhead is giving them all the sales data already. I wonder how much of rough rider sales came after the 35% drop in price?
Sorry if I laugh at it haha
- KVRist
- 470 posts since 11 Mar, 2007 from Portugal
One advantage of the Rack Extension format: Effortless instant Mac/PC 32bit/64bit support out of the same DSP code (and GUI).taoyoyo wrote:Can I be pissed off with Reason because an RE for MTron has just been released and we're still waiting for 64bit versions of the ferker?
Last edited by Koshdukai on Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRist
- 470 posts since 11 Mar, 2007 from Portugal
oops, you're right, I totally forgot about answering the OP, so here's my answer: YES, I AM!!!myrna wrote:of course, being the thread "are you pissed off at reason" the obvious answers will be only "yes" and "no". NO is for fanboys or newbie enthusiasts, YES is for the ones who have played this software with passion in the past. There are no alternatives, i doubt one who does not care at all about reason will waste his time reading the posts or answering...
...they should've done this years ago!
(do I still fit the "fan boy" category with this answer!?
...right, I think I've got my 5 posts. My work is done
