Well, I love that you have multiple successes which I think can arguably be your "real" legacyUrs wrote:Nah, that's way exaggerated. Z3 won't remotely have the significance of Diva.KBSoundSmith wrote:the U-he team are working on Zebra 3, which I can't wait to see (something in my gut is telling me that Zebra 3 might possibly prove to be the most significant soft synth to ever be developed. I just have a feeling we'll be talking about soft synths pre-Zebra 3 and post-Zebra 3 after a couple of years).
Otoh no-one has copied Zebra's concept yet in, hmm 8 years, so its significance may be solely on the user side, but has no broader influence on synthesis per se. I guess marketing divisions put Zebra down as not sexy enough, cluttered with tabbed panels. Which just means they haven't understood it yet. But if Zebra3 looks sexy enough then, yeah, maybe some competition will pop up, about 10 years late. (That said, as w'rabbyt pointeth out, a synth with a similar concept existed beforehand, but wasn't a success)
I do agree that Diva is a major milestone in soft synths (probably THE milestone so far), it oozes with quality. I just don't think we should forget how wonderful Zebra is, as well as how wonderful it will be. And I understand that a modular/semi-modular is always going to have a tough time being considered #1 due to (relative) complexity of use, as well as the fact that it isn't specialized in some way. But I think that when it comes to a modular that provides ease of use, a very wide sound palette, and simply the versatility to make sounds that other environments simply can't make, I think Zebra is untouchable.
What I think: Diva is #1 in sound. Zebra is #1 in concept.
I can't imagine what Berlin Modular will be like when it's done, though. I'll have to come up with a different category to give it number one status
