Jonathan Shepherd wrote:Version 2?!? I can wait, I think.

Jonathan Shepherd wrote:Version 2?!? I can wait, I think.

It looks real to me. Maybe it isn't. If this is pure CG I applaud the artist as it would be the first time I can't distinquish between real and CG anymore.Jonathan Shepherd wrote:This is computer graphics right?
The current version (1.1) sounds much better than the mp3 demo (though only when the filter boost setting is off). Very analog, a bit like old Roland synths but more modern. I'll make a better demo when I release the 2.0 version.V0RT3X wrote:Just listened to this
http://rinki.net/pekka/mausynth/maudemo.mp3
Sounds pretty legit so far. Definitely not analog sounding, although it definitely sounds like it has potential to sit in a mix well.
pity there is no OSX version, otherwise id give this a whirl
32bit one. The 64bit version can be used if it's bridged (I'm not sure if Cubase offers this feature, basically the 64bit plugins would run under separate process).Axis1~SL61 wrote:Hi -- I'm using cubase 32bit 0n Win7 64bit -- which version of MauSynth should I use, the 32 or 64 bit one?
This is pure CGTimfonie wrote:It looks real to me. Maybe it isn't. If this is pure CG I applaud the artist as it would be the first time I can't distinquish between real and CG anymore.Jonathan Shepherd wrote:This is computer graphics right?

Thanks!mr.bungle wrote:32bit one. The 64bit version can be used if it's bridged (I'm not sure if Cubase offers this feature, basically the 64bit plugins would run under separate process).Axis1~SL61 wrote:Hi -- I'm using cubase 32bit 0n Win7 64bit -- which version of MauSynth should I use, the 32 or 64 bit one?
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026