It wouldn't surprise me to find that our objection is supposed to be to the number two, in fact I have found evidence here that some people think like that.jopy wrote:Do you reckon that it used to be easier for people to dance to back in the 1800's when they all had that extra leg?ghettosynth wrote:I imagine that it has a lot to do with the asymmetry of the beat and human physicality.jopy wrote:Why would a dance tune in 3/4 be so odd? .
3/4 isn't popular
It's a pretty obvious thing to think about, and reasonably conclude that it isn't likely to be a very good idea.
Seriously though, that African music I posted is obviously dance music, but doesn't seem to require a rigid metric structure. I played African music for a while with a master drummer and he always insisted that people dance when we played, but he would also (gently) step on your foot if you tried to tap out the "beat" in a Western sense because that would interfere with understanding how the music actually fit together. What I am objecting to is not the idea that some music has a rigid symmetrical duple structure, but rather, the idea that to be danceable music MUST have a rigid structure.
there is all sorts of music, african, afro-cuban, latin music that relies on the presence of three and two at the same time which makes it more fun for the body. It's body music. People have trouble moving with a son clave? Evidently not.
if someone has a problem dancing to everything that isn't a two-division & resolved inside of ONE BAR OF (I am honestly amazed to see this) 4/4, they can't be much of a dancer. I see all this lingo to make a severe limitation necessary sound like it's so subtle and tricky and esoteric.
Aha, now the argument is that this is so because the beat [four on the floor] is constant and the DJ has to mix it to the next tune. So, is it all at the same tempo all night? I had a girlfriend who was a house DJ. There was actually modulation of the time in that.
So you, ghettosynth were initially trying out an argument for it per se: It seemed necessary that Sendy was wrong, operating out of bad assumptions, and this elaborate argument ensued from you.
But now this is just what some crowds have to have.
Would you say that the some crowds are more restricted in their ability to respond to rhythm?
I said it before, all this lingo to support not being able to find the time without that four on the floor. A great mass of people with no rhythm gathered to dance. It takes a lot of drugs to be there I guess.