KVR Audio

Uncle E · Post by **Uncle E** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:38 pm

electro wrote:TAL-Uno-LX is the most successful Native emulation of a hardware Analog synth.
http://kunz.corrupt.ch/products/tal-u-no-lx

A perfect emulation of a substandard analog.

ariston · Post by **ariston** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:39 pm

zerocrossing wrote: Underestimating the stupidity of things you read on the internet is also a silly thing to do. Next time use the appropriate Emoticon, such as

Will do, sir!

Now, if the beta is in keeping with the total amount of development time, we might even get our hands on LuSH by summer 2013!

zerocrossing · Post by **zerocrossing** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:20 pm

DrWashington wrote: Nothing wrong with hardware if you have it... I'm just saying, you can either be an incorrigible gearslut, or you can be a prolific musician. Choose wisely.

Funny, the list of prolific musicians who are also incorrigible gear sluts is longer than I can fit in my head at the moment. Especially keyboard/synthesis types.

What are you talking about?

Of course, many are not, and that's fine too, but to say musical prolificity and gear over-promiscuity are mutually exclusive is dumb. And that low-featured gear you speak of is usually the best sounding and quickest to work with anyway.

So, if you feel software is as good as you need, hurrah for you.

Some of it is really great and fun to use. I think I own all of it... almost. Doesn't mean I use all of it at the same time... I'll forget instruments for months only to rediscover them and have fun being inspired by what ever it was that made me buy it in the first place.

But I'll whip out any of my analogs for a solid sounding bass line any day of the week. I just think they sound better.

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:26 pm

electro wrote:TAL-Uno-LX is the most successful Native emulation of a hardware Analog synth.
http://kunz.corrupt.ch/products/tal-u-no-lx

Really? Where did you get that statistic from?

fmr · Post by **fmr** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:32 pm

Uncle E wrote:
electro wrote:TAL-Uno-LX is the most successful Native emulation of a hardware Analog synth.
http://kunz.corrupt.ch/products/tal-u-no-lx
A perfect emulation of a substandard analog.

So, the Juno-60 is a substandard analogue? And the SH-101? Is it a superstandard analogue?

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:40 pm

Ingonator wrote: One thing i already complained several times is why could people not judge a synth based on it's own sound and features. Why do people always have to compare any synth to Diva, especially if that synth maybe is not even close in terms of features?

Because it is considered as the holy grail of plugin programming i guess. Even though, afaic, there is not such thing as a "holy grail" when it comes to programming...

ksandvik · Post by **ksandvik** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:43 pm

Early day Synths, like Jupiter-4, tried to have patches sounding like real keyboards and people complained that it was not the real thing. Funny to see how the new VA Synths now have the same fate.

2NDMOUSE · Post by **2NDMOUSE** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:19 pm

ksandvik wrote:Early day Synths, like Jupiter-4, tried to have patches sounding like real keyboards and people complained that it was not the real thing. Funny to see how the new VA Synths now have the same fate.

Certain synths just have a character that dates them though. Yamaha dx7 for instance. It doesnt sound realistic either , yet it was Used on everything in the 80s , now never used , but i suspect someone will resurrect it again at some stage , because its particular brand of fm will be conducive to whatever the equivalent of the wobble will be in 20 years time.

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:21 pm

[DELETED]

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:29 pm

[DELETED]

C-note · Post by **C-note** » Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:00 am

ttoz wrote:PS is it just me or do the audio demos of lush sound nice, but not u-he/xils lab standard?

yep for me - just average. I heard nothing great enough to even want to demo this synth

Teksonik · Post by **Teksonik** » Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:06 am

C-note wrote:
ttoz wrote:PS is it just me or do the audio demos of lush sound nice, but not u-he/xils lab standard?
yep for me - just average. I heard nothing great enough to even want to demo this synth

So you wouldn't demo the synth based solely on audio demos? To be honest I'm not even bothering to listen to the audio demos anymore....I want to find out what it sounds like under my control. Nothing else matters....

If it sounds like crap and I'm willing to be it won't then it's delete and forget......if it sounds good then it's on to the Buy Now button.....

OutCider · Post by **OutCider** » Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:26 am

Ingonator wrote: i already complained several times is why could people not judge a synth based on it's own sound and features. Why do people always have to compare any synth to Diva, especially if that synth maybe is not even close in terms of features?

Another passive aggressive attack on Diva from kvr's most consistent passive aggressive.
I dismiss most, if not all of what you post, for many reasons.
But enough of telling you what a plank you are, when are the soundbanks for sale spams going to start?

Uncle E · Post by **Uncle E** » Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:28 am

fmr wrote:And the SH-101? Is it a superstandard analogue?

Honestly, it's not one of my favorites.

Biopharmer · Post by **Biopharmer** » Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:31 am

Uncle E wrote:
electro wrote:TAL-Uno-LX is the most successful Native emulation of a hardware Analog synth.
http://kunz.corrupt.ch/products/tal-u-no-lx
A perfect emulation of a substandard analog.

Can anyone vouch for it being a good Juno emulation anyway?

LuSH-101